These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Hydraulic Conductivity from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Logs in Sediments with Elevated Magnetic Susceptibilities. Crow H; Paradis D; Grunewald E; Liang XX; Russell HAJ Ground Water; 2022 May; 60(3):377-392. PubMed ID: 34905215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A small-diameter NMR logging tool for groundwater investigations. Walsh D; Turner P; Grunewald E; Zhang H; Butler JJ; Reboulet E; Knobbe S; Christy T; Lane JW; Johnson CD; Munday T; Fitzpatrick A Ground Water; 2013; 51(6):914-26. PubMed ID: 23425428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Groundwater flow velocities in karst aquifers; importance of spatial observation scale and hydraulic testing for contaminant transport prediction. Medici G; West LJ Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Aug; 28(32):43050-43063. PubMed ID: 34125385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Hydraulic Conductivity Estimates from Various Approaches with Groundwater Flow Models. Sun D; Luo N; Vandenhoff A; McCall W; Zhao Z; Wang C; Rudolph DL; Illman WA Ground Water; 2024; 62(3):384-404. PubMed ID: 37605321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transient Recharge Estimability Through Field-Scale Groundwater Model Calibration. Knowling MJ; Werner AD Ground Water; 2017 Nov; 55(6):827-840. PubMed ID: 28498485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of vertical variations in hydraulic conductivity in unconsolidated sediments. Dietze M; Dietrich P Ground Water; 2012; 50(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 21883188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of aquifer hydraulic conductivity and transmissivity of Ezza/Ikwo area, Southeastern Nigeria, using pumping test and surficial resistivity techniques. Oli IC; Opara AI; Okeke OC; Akaolisa CZ; Akakuru OC; Osi-Okeke I; Udeh HM Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Sep; 194(10):719. PubMed ID: 36053394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combining 3D Hydraulic Tomography with Tracer Tests for Improved Transport Characterization. Sanchez-León E; Leven C; Haslauer CP; Cirpka OA Ground Water; 2016 Jul; 54(4):498-507. PubMed ID: 26441342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of hydraulic tomography with traditional methods at a highly heterogeneous site. Berg SJ; Illman WA Ground Water; 2015; 53(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 24428358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Groundwater flow velocities in a fractured carbonate aquifer-type: Implications for contaminant transport. Medici G; West LJ; Banwart SA J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Apr; 222():1-16. PubMed ID: 30795856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterizing hydraulic conductivity with the direct-push permeameter. Butler JJ; Dietrich P; Wittig V; Christy T Ground Water; 2007; 45(4):409-19. PubMed ID: 17600571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The vertical hydraulic conductivity of an aquitard at two spatial scales. Hart DJ; Bradbury KR; Feinstein DT Ground Water; 2006; 44(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 16556202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New insights into permeability determination by coupling Stoneley wave propagation and conventional petrophysical logs in carbonate oil reservoirs. Rostami A; Kordavani A; Parchekhari S; Hemmati-Sarapardeh A; Helalizadeh A Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11618. PubMed ID: 35804036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of steady-state hydraulic tomography to inform the selection of a chaotic advection system. Cho MS; Zhao Z; Thomson NR; Illman WA J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Feb; 229():103559. PubMed ID: 31784037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Permeability profiles in granular aquifers using flowmeters in direct-push wells. Paradis D; Lefebvre R; Morin RH; Gloaguen E Ground Water; 2011; 49(4):534-47. PubMed ID: 20880040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]