These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37058423)

  • 1. Designing a decision aid for cancer prevention: a qualitative study.
    Milton S; Macrae F; McIntosh JG; Saya S; Alphonse P; Yogaparan T; Karnchanachari N; Novy K; Nguyen P; Lau P; Emery J
    Fam Pract; 2024 Jun; 41(3):349-359. PubMed ID: 37058423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should I Take Aspirin? (SITA): randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for cancer chemoprevention.
    Onwuka SR; McIntosh J; Macrae F; Chondros P; Boyd L; Wijesuriya R; Saya S; Karnchanachari N; Novy K; Jenkins MA; Walter FM; Trevena L; Gutierrez JM; Broun K; Fishman G; Marker J; Emery J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2024 Aug; 74(745):e498-e507. PubMed ID: 38527793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should I take aspirin? A qualitative study on the implementation of a decision aid on taking aspirin for bowel cancer prevention.
    Onwuka S; McIntosh J; Boyd L; Karnchanachari N; Macrae F; Fishman G; Emery J
    Fam Med Community Health; 2023 Nov; 11(Suppl 1):. PubMed ID: 38035774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An RCT of a decision aid to support informed choices about taking aspirin to prevent colorectal cancer and other chronic diseases: a study protocol for the SITA (Should I Take Aspirin?) trial.
    Milton S; McIntosh J; Macrae F; Chondros P; Trevena L; Jenkins M; Walter FM; Taylor N; Boyd L; Saya S; Karnchanachari N; Novy K; Forbes C; Gutierrez JM; Broun K; Whitburn S; McGill S; Fishman G; Marker J; Shub M; Emery J
    Trials; 2021 Jul; 22(1):452. PubMed ID: 34266464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefits and harms of aspirin to reduce colorectal cancer risk: a cross-sectional study of methods to communicate risk in primary care.
    Nguyen P; McIntosh J; Bickerstaffe A; Maddumarachchi S; Cummings KL; Emery JD
    Br J Gen Pract; 2019 Dec; 69(689):e843-e849. PubMed ID: 31740461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and user-testing of a brief decision aid for aspirin as a preventive approach alongside colorectal cancer screening.
    Semedo L; Lifford KJ; Edwards A; Seddon K; Brain K; Smits S; Dolwani S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):165. PubMed ID: 34016116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinicians' opinions on recommending aspirin to prevent colorectal cancer to Australians aged 50-70 years: a qualitative study.
    Milton S; McIntosh J; Yogaparan T; Alphonse P; Saya S; Karnchanachari N; Nguyen P; Lau P; Macrae F; Emery J
    BMJ Open; 2021 Feb; 11(2):e042261. PubMed ID: 33550247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceived barriers and facilitators of using a Web-based interactive decision aid for colorectal cancer screening in community practice settings: findings from focus groups with primary care clinicians and medical office staff.
    Jimbo M; Shultz CG; Nease DE; Fetters MD; Power D; Ruffin MT
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Dec; 15(12):e286. PubMed ID: 24351420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Information needs and preferences of low and high literacy consumers for decisions about colorectal cancer screening: utilizing a linguistic model.
    Smith SK; Trevena L; Nutbeam D; Barratt A; McCaffery KJ
    Health Expect; 2008 Jun; 11(2):123-36. PubMed ID: 18494957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 'They leave at least believing they had a part in the discussion': understanding decision aid use and patient-clinician decision-making through qualitative research.
    Tiedje K; Shippee ND; Johnson AM; Flynn PM; Finnie DM; Liesinger JT; May CR; Olson ME; Ridgeway JL; Shah ND; Yawn BP; Montori VM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Oct; 93(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 23598292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementing cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines to translate evidence-based medicine and shared decision making into general practice: theory-based intervention development, qualitative piloting and quantitative feasibility.
    Bonner C; Fajardo MA; Doust J; McCaffery K; Trevena L
    Implement Sci; 2019 Aug; 14(1):86. PubMed ID: 31466526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A patient decision aid regarding antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial.
    Man-Son-Hing M; Laupacis A; O'Connor AM; Biggs J; Drake E; Yetisir E; Hart RG
    JAMA; 1999 Aug; 282(8):737-43. PubMed ID: 10463708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond pros and cons - developing a patient decision aid to cultivate dialog to build relationships: insights from a qualitative study and decision aid development.
    Yu CH; Ke C; Jovicic A; Hall S; Straus SE;
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Sep; 19(1):186. PubMed ID: 31533828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Decision Aid for Patients Considering Surgery for Sciatica: Codesign and User-Testing With Patients and Clinicians.
    Ayre J; Kumarage R; Jenkins H; McCaffery KJ; Maher CG; Hancock MJ
    Health Expect; 2024 Jun; 27(3):e14111. PubMed ID: 38896009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Qualitative analysis of clinicians' perspectives on the use of a computerized decision aid in the treatment of psychotic disorders.
    Roebroek LO; Bruins J; Delespaul P; Boonstra A; Castelein S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Sep; 20(1):234. PubMed ID: 32943027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring Provider Reactions to Decision Aid Distribution and Shared Decision Making: Lessons from Two Specialties.
    Hsu C; Liss DT; Frosch DL; Westbrook EO; Arterburn D
    Med Decis Making; 2017 Jan; 37(1):113-126. PubMed ID: 27899745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PCI Choice: Cardiovascular clinicians' perceptions of shared decision making in stable coronary artery disease.
    Coylewright M; O'Neill ES; Dick S; Grande SW
    Patient Educ Couns; 2017 Jun; 100(6):1136-1143. PubMed ID: 28110953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision boxes for clinicians to support evidence-based practice and shared decision making: the user experience.
    Giguere A; Légaré F; Grad R; Pluye P; Haynes RB; Cauchon M; Rousseau F; Alvarez Argote J; Labrecque M
    Implement Sci; 2012 Aug; 7():72. PubMed ID: 22862935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and Feasibility of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Qualitative Pilot Study.
    Kim AH; Girgis A; De Cruz P; Siegel CA; Karimi N; Ruban SO; Sechi AJ; Ng WSW; Andrews JM; Connor SJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Feb; 23(2):e15946. PubMed ID: 33629956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring Consumer Experiences of Barriers and Enablers to Accessing Rehabilitation That Meets Their Needs: The Rehabilitation Choices Study, Part 2-Consumer Perspectives.
    Mason G; Ribbons K; Bailey L; O'Malley A; Ward T; Ward S; Pollack M; Walker FR; Nilsson M; Hodyl N
    Health Expect; 2024 Oct; 27(5):e70035. PubMed ID: 39315579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.