These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37059081)

  • 1. Effects of Gradual and Sudden Introduction of Perturbations on Adaptive Responses to Formant-Shift and Formant-Clamp Perturbations.
    Chao SC; Daliri A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 May; 66(5):1588-1599. PubMed ID: 37059081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Compensatory Responses to Formant Perturbations Proportionally Decrease as Perturbations Increase.
    Daliri A; Chao SC; Fitzgerald LC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Oct; 63(10):3392-3407. PubMed ID: 32976078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response patterns to vowel formant perturbations in children.
    Cheung ST; Thompson K; Chen JL; Yunusova Y; Beal DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):2647. PubMed ID: 34717445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Language dependent vowel representation in speech production.
    Mitsuya T; Samson F; Ménard L; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2993-3003. PubMed ID: 23654403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech compensation responses and sensorimotor adaptation to formant feedback perturbations.
    Raharjo I; Kothare H; Nagarajan SS; Houde JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1147. PubMed ID: 33639824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Computational Model for Estimating the Speech Motor System's Sensitivity to Auditory Prediction Errors.
    Daliri A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Jun; 64(6):1841-1854. PubMed ID: 34043445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensorimotor control of vocal pitch and formant frequencies in Parkinson's disease.
    Mollaei F; Shiller DM; Baum SR; Gracco VL
    Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 1646():269-277. PubMed ID: 27288701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of vowel perceptual cues in compensatory responses to perturbations of speech auditory feedback.
    Reilly KJ; Dougherty KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1314-23. PubMed ID: 23927128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels.
    Purcell DW; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2288-97. PubMed ID: 16642842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Responses to Auditory Feedback Manipulations in Speech May Be Affected by Previous Exposure to Auditory Errors.
    Niziolek CA; Parrell B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Jun; 64(6S):2169-2181. PubMed ID: 33705674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Compensations in response to real-time formant perturbations of different magnitudes.
    MacDonald EN; Goldberg R; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):1059-68. PubMed ID: 20136227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic analysis of vowel formant frequencies in genetically-related and non-genetically related speakers with implications for forensic speaker comparison.
    Cavalcanti JC; Eriksson A; Barbosa PA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246645. PubMed ID: 33600430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intact Correction for Self-Produced Vowel Formant Variability in Individuals With Cerebellar Ataxia Regardless of Auditory Feedback Availability.
    Parrell B; Ivry RB; Nagarajan SS; Houde JF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Jun; 64(6S):2234-2247. PubMed ID: 33900786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cross-language study of compensation in response to real-time formant perturbation.
    Mitsuya T; Macdonald EN; Purcell DW; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2978-86. PubMed ID: 22087926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vowel formant discrimination for high-fidelity speech.
    Liu C; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1224-33. PubMed ID: 15376687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. F0-induced formant measurement errors result in biased variabilities.
    Chen WR; Whalen DH; Shadle CH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 May; 145(5):EL360. PubMed ID: 31153348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased speech contrast induced by sensorimotor adaptation to a nonuniform auditory perturbation.
    Parrell B; Niziolek CA
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Feb; 125(2):638-647. PubMed ID: 33356887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Static measurements of vowel formant frequencies and bandwidths: A review.
    Kent RD; Vorperian HK
    J Commun Disord; 2018; 74():74-97. PubMed ID: 29891085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of total laryngectomy on vowel production: An acoustic study of vowels produced by alaryngeal speakers of Cantonese.
    Ng ML; Woo HK
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Dec; 23(6):652-661. PubMed ID: 33615923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.