141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37059232)
21. Comparison of systematic randomized 12-core transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasonography fusion-targeted prostate biopsy.
Song B; Hwang SI; Lee HJ; Jeong SJ; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Oct; 101(40):e30821. PubMed ID: 36221327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Targeted Biopsy With Use of Electromagnetically-tracked MR/US Fusion Guidance Platform for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Winoker JS; Wajswol E; Falagario U; Maritini A; Moshier E; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
Urology; 2020 Dec; 146():278-286. PubMed ID: 32956688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Initial Experience with Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Guided Micro-Ultrasound Biopsies versus Established Transperineal Robotic Ultrasound Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsies for Prostate Cancer.
Claros OR; Tourinho-Barbosa RR; Fregeville A; Gallardo AC; Muttin F; Carneiro A; Stabile A; Moschini M; Macek P; Cathala N; Mombet A; Sanchez-Salas R; Cathelineau X
J Urol; 2020 May; 203(5):918-925. PubMed ID: 31821099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Transperineal prostate biopsy with cognitive magnetic resonance imaging/biplanar ultrasound fusion: description of technique and early results.
Gorin MA; Meyer AR; Zimmerman M; Harb R; Joice GA; Schwen ZR; Allaf ME
World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):1943-1949. PubMed ID: 31679065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy on the Risk of Upgrading in Final Pathology in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy? An European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Study.
Zattoni F; Marra G; Martini A; Kasivisvanathan V; Grummet J; Harkin T; Ploussard G; Olivier J; Chiu PK; Valerio M; Marquis A; Gontero P; Guo H; Zhuang J; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Morlacco A; Kretschmer A; Barletta F; Heidegger I; Tilki D; van den Bergh R; Dal Moro F; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Novara G; Gandaglia G;
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):621-628. PubMed ID: 36746729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical implementation of pre-biopsy magnetic resonance imaging pathways for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Israël B; Immerzeel J; van der Leest M; Hannink G; Zámecnik P; Bomers J; Schoots IG; van Basten JP; Debruyne F; van Oort I; Sedelaar M; Barentsz J
BJU Int; 2022 Apr; 129(4):480-490. PubMed ID: 34358388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided In-bore and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsies: An Adjusted Comparison of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate.
Costa DN; Goldberg K; Leon AD; Lotan Y; Xi Y; Aziz M; Freifeld Y; Margulis V; Raj G; Roehrborn CG; Hornberger B; Desai N; Bagrodia A; Francis F; Pedrosa I; Cadeddu JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Jul; 2(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 31277776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches.
Tewes S; Peters I; Tiemeyer A; Peperhove M; Hartung D; Pertschy S; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Hueper K
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():2176471. PubMed ID: 29094042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the complications of traditional 12 cores transrectal prostate biopsy with image fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy.
Huang H; Wang W; Lin T; Zhang Q; Zhao X; Lian H; Guo H
BMC Urol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):68. PubMed ID: 27855661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies?
Leow JJ; Koh SH; Chow MW; Loke W; Salada R; Hong SK; Yeow Y; Lee CH; Tan CH; Tan TW
Asian J Androl; 2023; 25(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 35488666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Elastic Versus Rigid Image Registration in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Venderink W; de Rooij M; Sedelaar JPM; Huisman HJ; Fütterer JJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Mar; 4(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 28753777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?
Wegelin O; van Melick HHE; Hooft L; Bosch JLHR; Reitsma HB; Barentsz JO; Somford DM
Eur Urol; 2017 Apr; 71(4):517-531. PubMed ID: 27568655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Choi YH; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Chang Jeong B; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e19-e25. PubMed ID: 30415878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The eternal enigma in prostatic biopsy access route.
Fabiani A; Principi E; Filosa A; Servi L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Oct; 89(3):245-246. PubMed ID: 28969413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Prospective Comparison of Transrectal Standard, Cognitive, Transperineal Fusion, and Mapping Prostate Biopsy for Cancer Detection.
Petov V; Bazarkin A; Morozov A; Taratkin M; Ganzha T; Danilov S; Chernov Y; Chinenov D; Rzayev R; Suvorov A; Amosov A; Fajkovic H; Enikeev D; Krupinov G
J Endourol; 2023 Aug; 37(8):940-947. PubMed ID: 37294206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Transition from Transrectal to Transperineal MRI-Fusion Prostate Biopsy Does Not Comprise Detection Rates of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer at a Tertiary Care Center.
Hoeh B; Wenzel M; Humke C; Cano Garcia C; Siech C; Schneider M; Lange C; Traumann M; Köllermann J; Preisser F; Chun FKH; Mandel P
Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Jun; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 38893710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Koch R; Wirth M; Zastrow S
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):873-9. PubMed ID: 25523210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Standardized Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reporting Using the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation Criteria and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion with Transperineal Saturation Biopsy to Select Men on Active Surveillance.
Dieffenbacher S; Nyarangi-Dix J; Giganti F; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Müller-Wolf MB; Schütz V; Gasch C; Hatiboglu G; Hauffe M; Stenzinger A; Duensing S; Schlemmer HP; Moore CM; Hohenfellner M; Radtke JP
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jan; 7(1):102-110. PubMed ID: 30878348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A systematic review and meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound guided fusion biopsy of prostate for cancer detection-Comparing transrectal with transperineal approaches.
Loy LM; Lim GH; Leow JJ; Lee CH; Tan TW; Tan CH
Urol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):650-660. PubMed ID: 32505458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
