288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37059977)
1. Mid-term comparative study between the glenoid and humerus lateralization designs for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: which lateralization design is better?
Lee HH; Park SE; Ji JH; Jun HS
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Apr; 24(1):290. PubMed ID: 37059977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bony increased-offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty: 5 to 10 years' follow-up.
Boileau P; Morin-Salvo N; Bessière C; Chelli M; Gauci MO; Lemmex DB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2111-2122. PubMed ID: 32505414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Humeral offset as a predictor of outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Carrazana-Suarez LF; Panico LC; Smolinski MP; Blake RJ; McCroskey MA; Sykes JB; Lin A
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Jun; 31(6S):S158-S165. PubMed ID: 35378314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BS; Chaoui J; Walch G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Oct; 26(10):1726-1731. PubMed ID: 28528016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a descriptive analysis of different implants in current practice.
Werthel JD; Walch G; Vegehan E; Deransart P; Sanchez-Sotelo J; Valenti P
Int Orthop; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2349-2360. PubMed ID: 31254018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical results of bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an onlay 145° curved stem in patients with cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative study.
Franceschetti E; Ranieri R; Giovanetti de Sanctis E; Palumbo A; Franceschi F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jan; 29(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 31401130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robert H. Cofield, MD, Award for Best Oral Presentation 2023: Up to 8 mm of glenoid-sided lateralization does not increase the risk of acromial or scapular spine stress fracture following reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° inlay humeral component.
Pak T; Ardebol J; Menendez ME; Gobezie R; Sears BW; Lederman E; ; Werner BC; Denard PJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jun; 33(6S):S1-S8. PubMed ID: 38237722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Lateralization Design on Scapular Notching: A Single-Surgeon Experience.
Schoch BS; Taba H; Aibinder W; King JJ; Wright TW
Orthopedics; 2020 Nov; 43(6):e585-e591. PubMed ID: 32818286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study.
Beltrame A; Di Benedetto P; Cicuto C; Cainero V; Chisoni R; Causero A
Acta Biomed; 2019 Dec; 90(12-S):54-63. PubMed ID: 31821285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The lateralization and distalization shoulder angles are important determinants of clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Boutsiadis A; Lenoir H; Denard PJ; Panisset JC; Brossard P; Delsol P; Guichard F; Barth J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jul; 27(7):1226-1234. PubMed ID: 29602633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.
Levy JC; Berglund D; Vakharia R; DeVito P; Tahal DS; Mijc D; Ameri B
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Sep; 477(9):2097-2108. PubMed ID: 31107323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does isolated glenosphere lateralization affect outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
King JJ; Hones KM; Wright TW; Roche C; Zuckerman JD; Flurin PH; Schoch BS
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2023 Jun; 109(4):103401. PubMed ID: 36108822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?
Holschen M; Kiriazis A; Bockmann B; Schulte TL; Witt KA; Steinbeck J
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):307-315. PubMed ID: 33880654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of humeral and glenoid component variations on range of motion in reverse geometry total shoulder arthroplasty: a standardized computer model study.
Arenas-Miquelez A; Murphy RJ; Rosa A; Caironi D; Zumstein MA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):763-771. PubMed ID: 32763384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High tuberosity healing rate associated with better functional outcome following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures with a 135° prosthesis.
Schmalzl J; Jessen M; Sadler N; Lehmann LJ; Gerhardt C
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jan; 21(1):35. PubMed ID: 31948484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty vs. metal augments in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up.
Van de Kleut ML; Yuan X; Teeter MG; Athwal GS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Mar; 31(3):591-600. PubMed ID: 34968693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Grammont humeral design versus onlay curved-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up.
Merolla G; Walch G; Ascione F; Paladini P; Fabbri E; Padolino A; Porcellini G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Apr; 27(4):701-710. PubMed ID: 29290604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and mini-humeral tray reverse total shoulder arthroplasty implant comparisons: two-year clinical outcomes.
Krupp R; O'Grady C; Werner B; Wiater JM; Nyland J; Duquin T
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):1045-1056. PubMed ID: 37898968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: Is the glenoid implant problematic?
Lignel A; Berhouet J; Loirat MA; Collin P; Thomazeau H; Gallinet D; Boileau P; Favard L
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Oct; 104(6):773-777. PubMed ID: 30059761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lateralized vs. classic Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff deficiency Hamada stage 1-3: does the design make a difference?
Freislederer F; Toft F; Audigé L; Marzel A; Endell D; Scheibel M
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Feb; 31(2):341-351. PubMed ID: 34450279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
