135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37060633)
1. Impact of patient's habitus on image quality and quantitative metrics in 18F-FDG PET/CT images.
Zorz A; D'Alessio A; Guida F; Ramadan RM; Richetta E; Cuppari L; Pellerito R; Sacchetti GM; Brambilla M; Paiusco M; Stasi M; Matheoud R
Phys Med; 2023 May; 109():102584. PubMed ID: 37060633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.
Williams JM; Rani SD; Li X; Arlinghaus LR; Lee TC; MacDonald LR; Partridge SC; Kang H; Whisenant JG; Abramson RG; Linden HM; Kinahan PE; Yankeelov TE
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3801-13. PubMed ID: 26133582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Standardized Uptake Values of
Tlostanova MS; Chipiga LA
Sovrem Tekhnologii Med; 2021; 13(3):15-23. PubMed ID: 34603751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total-body
Hu P; Zhang Y; Yu H; Chen S; Tan H; Qi C; Dong Y; Wang Y; Deng Z; Shi H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jul; 48(8):2384-2394. PubMed ID: 33866409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of activity, scan duration and patient's body mass index in the optimization of FDG imaging protocols on a TOF-PET/CT scanner.
Matheoud R; Al-Maymani N; Oldani A; Sacchetti GM; Brambilla M; Carriero A
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Apr; 8(1):35. PubMed ID: 33825058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of image quality between step-and-shoot and continuous bed motion techniques in whole-body
Yamashita S; Yamamoto H; Nakaichi T; Yoneyama T; Yokoyama K
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 31(9):686-695. PubMed ID: 28815414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simulated Reduced-Count Whole-Body FDG PET: Evaluation in Children and Young Adults Imaged on a Digital PET Scanner.
Alves VPV; Brady S; Ata NA; Li Y; MacLean J; Zhang B; Sharp SE; Trout AT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Dec; 219(6):952-961. PubMed ID: 35731102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiotracer dose reduction in integrated PET/MR: implications from national electrical manufacturers association phantom studies.
Oehmigen M; Ziegler S; Jakoby BW; Georgi JC; Paulus DH; Quick HH
J Nucl Med; 2014 Aug; 55(8):1361-7. PubMed ID: 25006216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of PET/CT system, reconstruction protocol, data analysis method, and repositioning on PET/CT precision: An experimental evaluation using an oncology and brain phantom.
Mansor S; Pfaehler E; Heijtel D; Lodge MA; Boellaard R; Yaqub M
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6413-6424. PubMed ID: 28994465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial intelligence-based PET denoising could allow a two-fold reduction in [
Weyts K; Lasnon C; Ciappuccini R; Lequesne J; Corroyer-Dulmont A; Quak E; Clarisse B; Roussel L; Bardet S; Jaudet C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Sep; 49(11):3750-3760. PubMed ID: 35593925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Energy-based scatter estimation in clinical PET.
Hamill JJ; Cabello J; Surti S; Karp JS
Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 51(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 37956261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical respiratory motion correction software (reconstruct, register and averaged-RRA), for
Bouyeure-Petit AC; Chastan M; Edet-Sanson A; Becker S; Thureau S; Houivet E; Vera P; Hapdey S
Br J Radiol; 2017 Feb; 90(1070):20160549. PubMed ID: 27936893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of a shorter variable-acquisition time for legs to achieve true whole-body PET/CT images.
Umeda T; Miwa K; Murata T; Miyaji N; Wagatsuma K; Motegi K; Terauchi T; Koizumi M
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2017 Dec; 40(4):861-868. PubMed ID: 29098601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Time-of-flight PET/CT using low-activity protocols: potential implications for cancer therapy monitoring.
Murray I; Kalemis A; Glennon J; Hasan S; Quraishi S; Beyer T; Avril N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Aug; 37(9):1643-53. PubMed ID: 20428866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of strategies towards harmonization of FDG PET/CT studies in multicentre trials: comparison of scanner validation phantoms and data analysis procedures.
Makris NE; Huisman MC; Kinahan PE; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Oct; 40(10):1507-15. PubMed ID: 23754762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image Quality and Activity Optimization in Oncologic
van Sluis J; Boellaard R; Dierckx RAJO; Stormezand GN; Glaudemans AWJM; Noordzij W
J Nucl Med; 2020 May; 61(5):764-771. PubMed ID: 31628214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New standards for phantom image quality and SUV harmonization range for multicenter oncology PET studies.
Akamatsu G; Shimada N; Matsumoto K; Daisaki H; Suzuki K; Watabe H; Oda K; Senda M; Terauchi T; Tateishi U
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Feb; 36(2):144-161. PubMed ID: 35029817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phantom-based acquisition time and image reconstruction parameter optimisation for oncologic FDG PET/CT examinations using a digital system.
Fragoso Costa P; Jentzen W; Brahmer A; Mavroeidi IA; Zarrad F; Umutlu L; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Conti M; Seifert R; Sraieb M; Weber M; Kersting D
BMC Cancer; 2022 Aug; 22(1):899. PubMed ID: 35978274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
