These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Emmetropes and myopes differ little in their accommodation dynamics but strongly in their ciliary muscle morphology. Wagner S; Zrenner E; Strasser T Vision Res; 2019 Oct; 163():42-51. PubMed ID: 31401218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of age in the ciliary muscle during accommodation: Sectorial analysis. Domínguez-Vicent A; Monsálvez-Romín D; Esteve-Taboada JJ; Montés-Micó R; Ferrer-Blasco T J Optom; 2019; 12(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 29627301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implantation of scleral expansion band segments for the treatment of presbyopia. Qazi MA; Pepose JS; Shuster JJ Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Dec; 134(6):808-15. PubMed ID: 12470747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ciliary Muscle Electrostimulation to Restore Accommodation in Patients With Early Presbyopia: Preliminary Results. Gualdi L; Gualdi F; Rusciano D; Ambrósio R; Salomão MQ; Lopes B; Cappello V; Fintina T; Gualdi M J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):578-583. PubMed ID: 28880331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of monovision on dynamic accommodation of early presbyopes. Almutairi MS; Altoaimi BH; Bradley A Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 Jan; 40(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 31879995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accommodative Behavior of Young Eyes Wearing Multifocal Contact Lenses. Altoaimi BH; Almutairi MS; Kollbaum PS; Bradley A Optom Vis Sci; 2018 May; 95(5):416-427. PubMed ID: 29683985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring changes in ciliary muscle thickness with accommodation in young adults. Lossing LA; Sinnott LT; Kao CY; Richdale K; Bailey MD Optom Vis Sci; 2012 May; 89(5):719-26. PubMed ID: 22504328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Objective Verification of Physiologic Changes during Accommodation under Binocular, Monocular, and Pinhole Conditions. Park H; Park IK; Shin JH; Chun YS J Korean Med Sci; 2019 Jan; 34(4):e32. PubMed ID: 30686953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new look at an old problem: 3D modeling of accommodation reveals how age-related biomechanical changes contribute to dysfunction in presbyopia. Knaus KR; Hipsley A; Blemker SS Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2024 Feb; 23(1):193-205. PubMed ID: 37733144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Longitudinal changes in objective accommodative response, pupil size and spherical aberration: A case study. Plainis S; Panagopoulou S; Charman WN Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Jan; 44(1):168-176. PubMed ID: 37966110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metabolic monitoring of transcorneal electrical stimulation in retinitis pigmentosa. Della Volpe-Waizel M; Zuche HC; Müller U; Rickmann A; Scholl HPN; Todorova MG Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 258(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 31713752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The effect of extended depth of focus contact lenses on the accommodation of presbyopic eyes]. Liu LN; Zhong XW; Wu TF Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 57(4):292-296. PubMed ID: 33832054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Extralenticular and lenticular aspects of accommodation and presbyopia in human versus monkey eyes. Croft MA; McDonald JP; Katz A; Lin TL; Lütjen-Drecoll E; Kaufman PL Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 54(7):5035-48. PubMed ID: 23745002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accommodative Behavior of Eyes Wearing Aspheric Single Vision Contact Lenses. Altoaimi BH; Almutairi MS; Kollbaum P; Bradley A Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Oct; 94(10):971-980. PubMed ID: 28858004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]