226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37063934)
1. Differences in the Academic Attributes of Matched and Unmatched Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applicants are Narrowing.
Sudah SY; Imam N; Sirch F; Nicholson AD; Namdari S; Menendez ME
JB JS Open Access; 2023; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 37063934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comparison of Matched and Unmatched Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applicants from 2006 to 2014: Data from the National Resident Matching Program.
Schrock JB; Kraeutler MJ; Dayton MR; McCarty EC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Jan; 99(1):e1. PubMed ID: 28060237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends in successfully matched neurosurgery residency applicants.
Yu N; Hoch JS; Martin AR; Shahlaie K
J Neurosurg; 2023 Nov; 139(5):1456-1462. PubMed ID: 37086164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Academic Characteristics of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applicants from 2007 to 2014.
DePasse JM; Palumbo MA; Eberson CP; Daniels AH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 May; 98(9):788-95. PubMed ID: 27147692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of the 1990-2007 neurosurgery residency match: does applicant gender affect neurosurgery match outcome?
Durham SR; Donaldson K; Grady MS; Benzil DL
J Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 129(2):282-289. PubMed ID: 29882698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends in the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Match: Analysis of NRMP Data from 2007 to 2018.
Claus D; Anderson D; Staley V; Forster J; Meron A
PM R; 2021 Sep; 13(9):986-993. PubMed ID: 33237637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in the Main Residency Match From 2007 to 2020.
Van BW; White M; Patel O; Pina D; Wick JB; Le HV
Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e53968. PubMed ID: 38468993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Race, But Not Gender, Is Associated With Admissions Into Orthopaedic Residency Programs.
Poon SC; Nellans K; Gorroochurn P; Chahine NO
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Aug; 480(8):1441-1449. PubMed ID: 33229901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Which Application Factors Are Associated With Outstanding Performance in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency?
Su CA; Furdock RJ; Rascoe AS; Vallier HA; Liu RW; Voos JE; Gillespie RJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 481(2):387-396. PubMed ID: 36083836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Where Do Orthopaedic Surgery Applicants Match on Their Rank Lists? A Survey of Incoming Residents.
Imbergamo C; Sequeira S; Pizzo D; Wright M; Boucher H
JB JS Open Access; 2023; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 36605355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Fate of Unmatched Orthopaedic Applicants: Risk Factors and Outcomes.
Kheir MM; Tan TL; Rondon AJ; Chen AF
JB JS Open Access; 2020; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 32832827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How Did Coronavirus-19 Impact the Expenses for Medical Students Applying to an Orthopaedic Surgery Residency in 2020 to 2021?
Gordon AM; Conway CA; Sheth BK; Magruder ML; Vakharia RM; Levine WN; Razi AE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Mar; 480(3):443-451. PubMed ID: 34913886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of matching in an ophthalmology residency program.
Loh AR; Joseph D; Keenan JD; Lietman TM; Naseri A
Ophthalmology; 2013 Apr; 120(4):865-70. PubMed ID: 23260256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does Residency Selection Criteria Predict Performance in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency?
Raman T; Alrabaa RG; Sood A; Maloof P; Benevenia J; Berberian W
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Apr; 474(4):908-14. PubMed ID: 25940336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Academic Metrics Do Not Explain the Underrepresentation of Women in Orthopaedic Training Programs.
Poon S; Nellans K; Crabb RAL; Rothman A; Wendolowski SF; Kiridly D; Gecelter R; Akerman M; Chahine NO
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Apr; 101(8):e32. PubMed ID: 30994596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Generation Y and the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Match: A Cross-sectional Study of the 2011 Match Outcomes.
Sue GR; Narayan D
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2013 Aug; 1(5):e33. PubMed ID: 25289227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Otolaryngology Applicant Characteristics and Trends: Comparing OTO-HNS with Peer Specialties.
Salehi PP; Heiser A; Salehi P; Torabi SJ; Fine RL; Judson B; Azizzadeh B; Lee YH
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2021 Aug; 130(8):929-940. PubMed ID: 33435722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Successfully matching into surgical specialties: an analysis of national resident matching program data.
Rinard JR; Mahabir RC
J Grad Med Educ; 2010 Sep; 2(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 21976075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Predictors for Successful Residency Match in General Surgery.
Iwai Y; Lenze NR; Becnel CM; Mihalic AP; Stitzenberg KB
J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(3):579-586. PubMed ID: 34852956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motivations and demographics of I-6 and traditional 5+2 cardiothoracic surgery resident applicants: insights from an academic training program.
Varghese TK; Mokadam NA; Verrier ED; Wallyce D; Wood DE
Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Sep; 98(3):877-83. PubMed ID: 25085556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
