These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37064407)

  • 21. Tumor volume-adapted SUV
    Mosleh-Shirazi MA; Nasiri-Feshani Z; Ghafarian P; Alavi M; Haddadi G; Ketabi A
    Jpn J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):811-823. PubMed ID: 33880686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Harmonizing FDG PET quantification while maintaining optimal lesion detection: prospective multicentre validation in 517 oncology patients.
    Quak E; Le Roux PY; Hofman MS; Robin P; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns D; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(13):2072-82. PubMed ID: 26219870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improved PET quantification and harmonization by adaptive denoising.
    Namías M; Jeraj R
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Jan; 6(1):015023. PubMed ID: 33438611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Generating harmonized SUV within the EANM EARL accreditation program: software approach versus EARL-compliant reconstruction.
    Lasnon C; Salomon T; Desmonts C; Dô P; Oulkhouir Y; Madelaine J; Aide N
    Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Feb; 31(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 27812791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Total-body
    Hu P; Zhang Y; Yu H; Chen S; Tan H; Qi C; Dong Y; Wang Y; Deng Z; Shi H
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jul; 48(8):2384-2394. PubMed ID: 33866409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of scanner harmonization on PET-based treatment response assessment in metastatic melanoma.
    Weisman AJ; Bradshaw TJ; Namias M; Jeraj R
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(22):225003. PubMed ID: 32906111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of Image Reconstruction Settings on Texture Features in 18F-FDG PET.
    Yan J; Chu-Shern JL; Loi HY; Khor LK; Sinha AK; Quek ST; Tham IW; Townsend D
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1667-73. PubMed ID: 26229145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Test-Retest Reproducibility of
    Kurland BF; Peterson LM; Shields AT; Lee JH; Byrd DW; Novakova-Jiresova A; Muzi M; Specht JM; Mankoff DA; Linden HM; Kinahan PE
    J Nucl Med; 2019 May; 60(5):608-614. PubMed ID: 30361381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Harmonization of Standardized Uptake Value among Different Generation PET/ CT Cameras Based on a Phantom Experiment -Utility of SUV(peak)].
    Akamatsu G; Nishida H; Fujino A; Ohnishi A; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Maebatake A; Sasaki M; Senda M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Sep; 71(9):735-45. PubMed ID: 26400557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Harmonization of standardized uptake values between two scanners, considering repeatability and magnitude of the values in clinical fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET settings: a phantom study.
    Iizuka H; Daisaki H; Ogawa M; Yoshida K; Kaneta T
    Nucl Med Commun; 2019 Aug; 40(8):857-864. PubMed ID: 31145204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How Often Do We Fail to Classify the Treatment Response with [
    Mattoli MV; Calcagni ML; Taralli S; Indovina L; Spottiswoode BS; Giordano A
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Dec; 21(6):1210-1219. PubMed ID: 30850971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of count-based image reconstruction to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured standardised uptake values.
    Kaneta T; Daisaki H; Ogawa M; Liu ET; Iizuka H; Arisawa T; Hino-Shishikura A; Yoshida K; Inoue T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192549. PubMed ID: 29432459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of different signal-to-background ratios on spatial resolution and F18-FDG-PET quantification using point spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction.
    Rogasch JM; Hofheinz F; Lougovski A; Furth C; Ruf J; Großer OS; Mohnike K; Hass P; Walke M; Amthauer H; Steffen IG
    EJNMMI Phys; 2014 Dec; 1(1):12. PubMed ID: 26501454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. EARL compliance measurements on the biograph vision Quadra PET/CT system with a long axial field of view.
    Prenosil GA; Hentschel M; Weitzel T; Sari H; Shi K; Afshar-Oromieh A; Rominger A
    EJNMMI Phys; 2022 Apr; 9(1):26. PubMed ID: 35394263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Variability of lesion detectability and standardized uptake value according to the acquisition procedure and reconstruction among five PET scanners.
    Takahashi Y; Oriuchi N; Otake H; Endo K; Murase K
    Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Jul; 22(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 18670864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Point-spread function reconstructed PET images of sub-centimeter lesions are not quantitative.
    Munk OL; Tolbod LP; Hansen SB; Bogsrud TV
    EJNMMI Phys; 2017 Dec; 4(1):5. PubMed ID: 28091957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Variability and uncertainty of 18F-FDG PET imaging protocols for assessing inflammation in atherosclerosis: suggestions for improvement.
    Huet P; Burg S; Le Guludec D; Hyafil F; Buvat I
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 56(4):552-9. PubMed ID: 25722452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of time of flight and point spread function on quantitative parameters of lung lesions in
    Huang K; Feng Y; Liang W; Li L
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Nov; 21(1):169. PubMed ID: 34773998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multi-site quality and variability analysis of 3D FDG PET segmentations based on phantom and clinical image data.
    Beichel RR; Smith BJ; Bauer C; Ulrich EJ; Ahmadvand P; Budzevich MM; Gillies RJ; Goldgof D; Grkovski M; Hamarneh G; Huang Q; Kinahan PE; Laymon CM; Mountz JM; Muzi JP; Muzi M; Nehmeh S; Oborski MJ; Tan Y; Zhao B; Sunderland JJ; Buatti JM
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):479-496. PubMed ID: 28205306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Variability and Repeatability of Quantitative Uptake Metrics in
    Zhuang M; García DV; Kramer GM; Frings V; Smit EF; Dierckx R; Hoekstra OS; Boellaard R
    J Nucl Med; 2019 May; 60(5):600-607. PubMed ID: 30389824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.