These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37065422)

  • 1. Multimodal Optical Coherence Tomography for Intraoperative Evaluation of Tumor Margins and Surgical Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Vorontsov DA; Gubarkova EV; Sirotkina MA; Sovetsky AA; Plekhanov AA; Kuznetsov SS; Davydova DA; Bogomolova AY; Zaitsev VY; Gamayunov SV; Vorontsov AY; Sobolevskiy VA; Gladkova ND
    Sovrem Tekhnologii Med; 2022; 14(2):26-38. PubMed ID: 37065422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Micro-Elastography for Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Kennedy KM; Zilkens R; Allen WM; Foo KY; Fang Q; Chin L; Sanderson RW; Anstie J; Wijesinghe P; Curatolo A; Tan HEI; Morin N; Kunjuraman B; Yeomans C; Chin SL; DeJong H; Giles K; Dessauvagie BF; Latham B; Saunders CM; Kennedy BF
    Cancer Res; 2020 Apr; 80(8):1773-1783. PubMed ID: 32295783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretation of Optical Coherence Tomography Images for Breast Tissue Assessment.
    Yemul KS; Zysk AM; Richardson AL; Tangella KV; Jacobs LK
    Surg Innov; 2019 Feb; 26(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 30295149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraoperative evaluation of breast tumor margins with optical coherence tomography.
    Nguyen FT; Zysk AM; Chaney EJ; Kotynek JG; Oliphant UJ; Bellafiore FJ; Rowland KM; Johnson PA; Boppart SA
    Cancer Res; 2009 Nov; 69(22):8790-6. PubMed ID: 19910294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of surgically excised breast tissue microstructure using wide-field optical coherence tomography.
    Schmidt H; Connolly C; Jaffer S; Oza T; Weltz CR; Port ER; Corben A
    Breast J; 2020 May; 26(5):917-923. PubMed ID: 31612563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simplifying the assessment of human breast cancer by mapping a micro-scale heterogeneity index in optical coherence elastography.
    Chin L; Latham B; Saunders CM; Sampson DD; Kennedy BF
    J Biophotonics; 2017 May; 10(5):690-700. PubMed ID: 27618159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fully Automated Postlumpectomy Breast Margin Assessment Utilizing Convolutional Neural Network Based Optical Coherence Tomography Image Classification Method.
    Mojahed D; Ha RS; Chang P; Gan Y; Yao X; Angelini B; Hibshoosh H; Taback B; Hendon CP
    Acad Radiol; 2020 May; 27(5):e81-e86. PubMed ID: 31324579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraoperative Assessment of Tumor Resection Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery Using
    Grootendorst MR; Cariati M; Pinder SE; Kothari A; Douek M; Kovacs T; Hamed H; Pawa A; Nimmo F; Owen J; Ramalingam V; Sethi S; Mistry S; Vyas K; Tuch DS; Britten A; Van Hemelrijck M; Cook GJ; Sibley-Allen C; Allen S; Purushotham A
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Jun; 58(6):891-898. PubMed ID: 27932562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optical Coherence Tomography: A Novel Imaging Method for Post-lumpectomy Breast Margin Assessment-A Multi-reader Study.
    Ha R; Friedlander LC; Hibshoosh H; Hendon C; Feldman S; Ahn S; Schmidt H; Akens MK; Fitzmaurice M; Wilson BC; Mango VL
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):279-287. PubMed ID: 29174226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visualization and tissue classification of human breast cancer images using ultrahigh-resolution OCT.
    Yao X; Gan Y; Chang E; Hibshoosh H; Feldman S; Hendon C
    Lasers Surg Med; 2017 Mar; 49(3):258-269. PubMed ID: 28264146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of perioperative techniques to attain negative margins and spare healthy breast tissue in breast conserving surgery.
    Krishna KL; Srinath BS; Santosh D; Velusamy S; Divyamala KP; Sariya Mohammadi J; Kurpad V; Kulkarni S; Yaji P; Goud S; Dhanireddy S; Ram J
    Breast Dis; 2020; 39(3-4):127-135. PubMed ID: 32831188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cross-Polarization OCT and OCT-Elastography for Differentiation of Breast Cancer Subtypes: Comparative Study.
    Gubarkova EV; Kiseleva EB; Sirotkina MA; Vorontsov DA; Achkasova KA; Kuznetsov SS; Yashin KS; Matveyev AL; Sovetsky AA; Matveev LA; Plekhanov AA; Vorontsov AY; Zaitsev VY; Gladkova ND
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Nov; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 33255263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraoperative Assessment of Final Margins with a Handheld Optical Imaging Probe During Breast-Conserving Surgery May Reduce the Reoperation Rate: Results of a Multicenter Study.
    Zysk AM; Chen K; Gabrielson E; Tafra L; May Gonzalez EA; Canner JK; Schneider EB; Cittadine AJ; Scott Carney P; Boppart SA; Tsuchiya K; Sawyer K; Jacobs LK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):3356-62. PubMed ID: 26202553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional mapping of the attenuation coefficient in optical coherence tomography to enhance breast tissue microarchitecture contrast.
    Foo KY; Chin L; Zilkens R; Lakhiani DD; Fang Q; Sanderson R; Dessauvagie BF; Latham B; McLaren S; Saunders CM; Kennedy BF
    J Biophotonics; 2020 Jun; 13(6):e201960201. PubMed ID: 32141243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer Tissues after Breast-Conserving Surgery Based on Mapping the Attenuation Coefficients in 3D Cross-Polarization Optical Coherence Tomography.
    Gubarkova E; Kiseleva E; Moiseev A; Vorontsov D; Kuznetsov S; Plekhanov A; Karabut M; Sirotkina M; Gelikonov G; Gamayunov S; Vorontsov A; Krivorotko P; Gladkova N
    Cancers (Basel); 2023 May; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 37174128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compression OCT-elastography combined with speckle-contrast analysis as an approach to the morphological assessment of breast cancer tissue.
    Plekhanov AA; Gubarkova EV; Sirotkina MA; Sovetsky AA; Vorontsov DA; Matveev LA; Kuznetsov SS; Bogomolova AY; Vorontsov AY; Matveyev AL; Gamayunov SV; Zagaynova EV; Zaitsev VY; Gladkova ND
    Biomed Opt Express; 2023 Jun; 14(6):3037-3056. PubMed ID: 37342703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography for margin assessment in breast-conserving surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Duan Y; Guo D; Zhang X; Lan L; Meng H; Wang Y; Sui C; Qu Z; He G; Wang C; Liu X
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Sep; 43():103718. PubMed ID: 37482370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating optical coherence tomography for surgical margin assessment of canine mammary tumours.
    Fabelo C; Selmic LE; Huang PC; Samuelson JP; Reagan JK; Kalamaras A; Wavreille V; Monroy GL; Marjanovic M; Boppart SA
    Vet Comp Oncol; 2021 Dec; 19(4):697-706. PubMed ID: 32562330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoperative optical coherence tomography for soft tissue sarcoma differentiation and margin identification.
    Mesa KJ; Selmic LE; Pande P; Monroy GL; Reagan J; Samuelson J; Driskell E; Li J; Marjanovic M; Chaney EJ; Boppart SA
    Lasers Surg Med; 2017 Mar; 49(3):240-248. PubMed ID: 28319274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Absence of residual fluorescence in the surgical bed at near-infrared fluorescence imaging predicts negative margins at final pathology in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.
    Pop FC; Veys I; Vankerckhove S; Barbieux R; Chintinne M; Moreau M; Donckier V; Larsimont D; Bourgeois P; Liberale G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):269-275. PubMed ID: 33183928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.