These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37066016)

  • 41. Preliminary comparison of the modified extraperitoneal free-PORT single incision technique and transabdominal multi-incision robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Ren S; Ou Y; Wang Y; Wei Y; Luo C; Yang B; Yuan J; Lv Q; Zhou F; Chen Z; Nie Y; Lin J; Wu Y; Yang B; Fan S; Wang D
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):1430. PubMed ID: 36697443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Robot-assisted Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion After Pelvic Irradiation for Prostate Cancer: Technique and Results from a Single High-volume Center.
    Piazza P; Rosiello G; Chacon VT; Puliatti S; Amato M; Farinha R; Schiavina R; Brunocilla E; Berquin C; Develtere D; Sinatti C; Van Puyvelde H; De Groote R; Schatteman P; De Naeyer G; D'Hondt F; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2021 Oct; 80(4):489-496. PubMed ID: 33838960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approaches.
    Mistretta FA; Galfano A; Di Trapani E; Di Trapani D; Russo A; Secco S; Ferro M; Musi G; Bocciardi AM; de Cobelli O
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(2):262-272. PubMed ID: 30676299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review.
    Yuh B; Artibani W; Heidenreich A; Kimm S; Menon M; Novara G; Tewari A; Touijer K; Wilson T; Zorn KC; Eggener SE
    Eur Urol; 2014 May; 65(5):918-27. PubMed ID: 23721959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Prospective randomised non-inferiority trial of pelvic drain placement vs no pelvic drain placement after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Chenam A; Yuh B; Zhumkhawala A; Ruel N; Chu W; Lau C; Chan K; Wilson T; Yamzon J
    BJU Int; 2018 Mar; 121(3):357-364. PubMed ID: 28872774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Obesity strongly predicts clinically undetected multiple lymph node metastases in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent robot assisted radical prostatectomy and extended lymph node dissection.
    Tafuri A; Amigoni N; Rizzetto R; Sebben M; Shakir A; Gozzo A; Odorizzi K; De Michele M; Gallina S; Bianchi A; Ornaghi P; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Verratti V; Migliorini F; Cerruto MA; Artibani W; Antonelli A; Porcaro AB
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2020 Nov; 52(11):2097-2105. PubMed ID: 32607958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Surgical and oncological outcomes in patients with a preoperative PSA value <4 ng/ml undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Zugor V; Labanaris AP; Bauer RM; Witt JH
    Anticancer Res; 2012 May; 32(5):2079-83. PubMed ID: 22593492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Adherence of the indication to European Association of Urology guideline recommended pelvic lymph node dissection at a high-volume center: Differences between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Schiffmann J; Haese A; Leyh-Bannurah SR; Salomon G; Steuber T; Schlomm T; Boehm K; Beyer B; Larcher A; Michl U; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1547-53. PubMed ID: 26117216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a high-volume surgical center experience.
    Scarcia M; Zazzara M; Divenuto L; Cardo G; Portoghese F; Romano M; Ludovico GM
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2018 Oct; 70(5):479-485. PubMed ID: 30021425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reducing the Risk of Postoperative Complications After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients: Results of an Audit and Feedback Intervention Following the Implementation of Prospective Data Collection.
    Rosiello G; Gandaglia G; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Fossati N; Stabile A; Gallina A; Mazzone E; Vitale LM; Pellegrino A; Bravi C; Martini A; Cucchiara V; Karakiewicz PI; Mottrie A; Briganti A; Montorsi F
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Mar; 8(2):431-437. PubMed ID: 33879394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Early outcomes of single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: lessons learned from the learning-curve experience.
    Covas Moschovas M; Bhat S; Onol F; Rogers T; Patel V
    BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):114-121. PubMed ID: 32623822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Standardized comparison of robot-assisted limited and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer.
    Yuh BE; Ruel NH; Mejia R; Novara G; Wilson TG
    BJU Int; 2013 Jul; 112(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 23351148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Safety and feasibility of outpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Banapour P; Elliott P; Jabaji R; Parekh A; Pathak A; Merchant M; Tamaddon K
    J Robot Surg; 2019 Apr; 13(2):261-265. PubMed ID: 30003407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Barakat B; Othman H; Gauger U; Wolff I; Hadaschik B; Rehme C
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Jul; 8(4):1060-1071. PubMed ID: 34429272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Functional outcomes of transvesical single-site versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for low-risk prostate cancer].
    Liu S; Wen XQ
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Nov; 20(11):1012-9. PubMed ID: 25577838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy through single incision: Establishment and application of a modified channel].
    Zhou F; Ren SQ; Fan SD; L Q; Chen ZJ; Ou Y; Nie Y; Tian JZ; Huang JJ; Wang D
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2021 Oct; 27(10):892-898. PubMed ID: 34914267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Total Anatomical Reconstruction During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications on Early Recovery of Urinary Continence.
    Porpiglia F; Bertolo R; Manfredi M; De Luca S; Checcucci E; Morra I; Passera R; Fiori C
    Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):485-95. PubMed ID: 26297603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Extent of pelvic lymph node dissection improves early oncological outcomes for patients with high-risk prostate cancer without lymph node involvement after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Morizane S; Honda M; Shimizu R; Tsounapi P; Teraoka S; Yumioka T; Yamaguchi N; Kawamoto B; Iwamoto H; Hikita K; Takenaka A
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2022 Apr; 27(4):781-789. PubMed ID: 35076818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Urinary continence outcomes of four years of follow-up and predictors of early and late urinary continence in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Li X; Zhang H; Jia Z; Wang Y; Song Y; Liao L; Zhang X
    BMC Urol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):29. PubMed ID: 32188426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Impact of prostate size in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Boczko J; Erturk E; Golijanin D; Madeb R; Patel H; Joseph JV
    J Endourol; 2007 Feb; 21(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 17338619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.