These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37067073)

  • 1. EEG mismatch responses in a multimodal roving stimulus paradigm provide evidence for probabilistic inference across audition, somatosensation, and vision.
    Grundei M; Schröder P; Gijsen S; Blankenburg F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Jun; 44(9):3644-3668. PubMed ID: 37067073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multimodal cortical network of sensory expectation violation revealed by fMRI.
    Grundei M; Schmidt TT; Blankenburg F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Dec; 44(17):5871-5891. PubMed ID: 37721377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ketamine Affects Prediction Errors about Statistical Regularities: A Computational Single-Trial Analysis of the Mismatch Negativity.
    Weber LA; Diaconescu AO; Mathys C; Schmidt A; Kometer M; Vollenweider F; Stephan KE
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jul; 40(29):5658-5668. PubMed ID: 32561673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A modified oddball paradigm "cross-modal delayed response" and the research on mismatch negativity.
    Wei JH; Chan TC; Luo YJ
    Brain Res Bull; 2002 Jan; 57(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 11849829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical Bayes evaluation of fused EEG-MEG source reconstruction: Application to auditory mismatch evoked responses.
    Lecaignard F; Bertrand O; Caclin A; Mattout J
    Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117468. PubMed ID: 33075561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical mapping of mismatch responses to independent acoustic features.
    An H; Auksztulewicz R; Kang H; Schnupp JWH
    Hear Res; 2021 Jan; 399():107894. PubMed ID: 31987647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing cross-modal target transition effects with a visual-auditory oddball.
    Kiat JE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jul; 129():58-66. PubMed ID: 29723555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual Mismatch and Predictive Coding: A Computational Single-Trial ERP Study.
    Stefanics G; Heinzle J; Horváth AA; Stephan KE
    J Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 38(16):4020-4030. PubMed ID: 29581379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can intensity modulation of the auditory response explain intensity-decrement mismatch negativity?
    O'Reilly JA
    Neurosci Lett; 2021 Nov; 764():136199. PubMed ID: 34461160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory, Visual, and Cross-Modal Mismatch Negativities in the Rat Auditory and Visual Cortices.
    Shiramatsu TI; Mori K; Ishizu K; Takahashi H
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2021; 15():721476. PubMed ID: 34602996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finding the missing-stimulus mismatch negativity (MMN) in early psychosis: altered MMN to violations of an auditory gestalt.
    Rudolph ED; Ells EM; Campbell DJ; Abriel SC; Tibbo PG; Salisbury DF; Fisher DJ
    Schizophr Res; 2015 Aug; 166(1-3):158-63. PubMed ID: 26072323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional features of crossmodal mismatch responses.
    Zhao C; Valentini E; Hu L
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):617-29. PubMed ID: 25398556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implicit auditory perception of local and global irregularities in passive listening condition.
    Liaukovich K; Ukraintseva Y; Martynova O
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Jan; 165():108129. PubMed ID: 34929262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic auditory processing of english words as indexed by the mismatch negativity, using a multiple deviant paradigm.
    Pettigrew CM; Murdoch BE; Ponton CW; Finnigan S; Alku P; Kei J; Sockalingam R; Chenery HJ
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):284-301. PubMed ID: 15179119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory stimulus discrimination recorded in dogs, as indicated by mismatch negativity (MMN).
    Howell TJ; Conduit R; Toukhsati S; Bennett P
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jan; 89(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 22001730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modulation of mismatch negativity by stimulus deviance and modality of attention.
    Müller BW; Achenbach C; Oades RD; Bender S; Schall U
    Neuroreport; 2002 Jul; 13(10):1317-20. PubMed ID: 12151795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neuropsychological correlates of auditory perceptual inference: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
    Todd J; Myers R; Pirillo R; Drysdale K
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1310():113-23. PubMed ID: 19914219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.