These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37068044)

  • 41. SNP2SIM: a modular workflow for standardizing molecular simulation and functional analysis of protein variants.
    McCoy MD; Shivakumar V; Nimmagadda S; Jafri MS; Madhavan S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Apr; 20(1):171. PubMed ID: 30943891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A kernel-based approach to molecular conformation analysis.
    Klus S; Bittracher A; Schuster I; Schütte C
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Dec; 149(24):244109. PubMed ID: 30599717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Machine Learning Based Dimensionality Reduction Facilitates Ligand Diffusion Paths Assessment: A Case of Cytochrome P450cam.
    Rydzewski J; Nowak W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Apr; 12(4):2110-20. PubMed ID: 26989997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Toward Focusing Conformational Ensembles on Bioactive Conformations: A Molecular Mechanics/Quantum Mechanics Study.
    Avgy-David HH; Senderowitz H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Oct; 55(10):2154-67. PubMed ID: 26406154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Are induced fit protein conformational changes caused by ligand-binding predictable? A molecular dynamics investigation.
    Gao C; Desaphy J; Vieth M
    J Comput Chem; 2017 Jun; 38(15):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 28419481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Machine Learning and Network Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Trajectories Reveal Two Chains of Red/Ox-specific Residue Interactions in Human Protein Disulfide Isomerase.
    Karamzadeh R; Karimi-Jafari MH; Sharifi-Zarchi A; Chitsaz H; Salekdeh GH; Moosavi-Movahedi AA
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3666. PubMed ID: 28623339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Identifying the leading dynamics of ubiquitin: A comparison between the tICA and the LE4PD slow fluctuations in amino acids' position.
    Beyerle ER; Guenza MG
    J Chem Phys; 2021 Dec; 155(24):244108. PubMed ID: 34972386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Mapping the Ligand Binding Landscape.
    Dickson A
    Biophys J; 2018 Nov; 115(9):1707-1719. PubMed ID: 30327139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Protein flexibility and ligand recognition: challenges for molecular modeling.
    Spyrakis F; BidonChanal A; Barril X; Luque FJ
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2011; 11(2):192-210. PubMed ID: 20939788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Ligand-bound glutamine binding protein assumes multiple metastable binding sites with different binding affinities.
    Zhang L; Wu S; Feng Y; Wang D; Jia X; Liu Z; Liu J; Wang W
    Commun Biol; 2020 Aug; 3(1):419. PubMed ID: 32747735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Fast and accurate prediction of partial charges using Atom-Path-Descriptor-based machine learning.
    Wang J; Cao D; Tang C; Chen X; Sun H; Hou T
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Sep; 36(18):4721-4728. PubMed ID: 32525553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A fully differentiable ligand pose optimization framework guided by deep learning and a traditional scoring function.
    Wang Z; Zheng L; Wang S; Lin M; Wang Z; Kong AW; Mu Y; Wei Y; Li W
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 36502369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Identification of Cryptic Binding Sites Using MixMD with Standard and Accelerated Molecular Dynamics.
    Smith RD; Carlson HA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Mar; 61(3):1287-1299. PubMed ID: 33599485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Probing Protein Allostery as a Residue-Specific Concept via Residue Response Maps.
    Hayatshahi HS; Ahuactzin E; Tao P; Wang S; Liu J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Nov; 59(11):4691-4705. PubMed ID: 31589429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Predicting protein conformational changes for unbound and homology docking: learning from intrinsic and induced flexibility.
    Chen H; Sun Y; Shen Y
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):544-556. PubMed ID: 27862345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Deciphering the importance of MD descriptors in designing Vitamin D Receptor agonists and antagonists using machine learning.
    Nagamani S; Jaiswal L; Sastry GN
    J Mol Graph Model; 2023 Jan; 118():108346. PubMed ID: 36208593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Dynamic Docking of Macrocycles in Bound and Unbound Protein Structures with DynaDock.
    Meixner M; Zachmann M; Metzler S; Scheerer J; Zacharias M; Antes I
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jul; 62(14):3426-3441. PubMed ID: 35796228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. EasyAmber: A comprehensive toolbox to automate the molecular dynamics simulation of proteins.
    Suplatov D; Sharapova Y; Švedas V
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2020 Dec; 18(6):2040011. PubMed ID: 32833550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Exploring the stability of ligand binding modes to proteins by molecular dynamics simulations.
    Liu K; Watanabe E; Kokubo H
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Feb; 31(2):201-211. PubMed ID: 28074360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Slow dynamics in protein fluctuations revealed by time-structure based independent component analysis: the case of domain motions.
    Naritomi Y; Fuchigami S
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Feb; 134(6):065101. PubMed ID: 21322734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.