These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37068307)

  • 1. Transformer-based anti-noise models for CRISPR-Cas9 off-target activities prediction.
    Guan Z; Jiang Z
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 May; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 37068307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpretable CRISPR/Cas9 off-target activities with mismatches and indels prediction using BERT.
    Luo Y; Chen Y; Xie H; Zhu W; Zhang G
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Feb; 169():107932. PubMed ID: 38199209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effective use of sequence information to predict CRISPR-Cas9 off-target.
    Zhang ZR; Jiang ZR
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2022; 20():650-661. PubMed ID: 35140885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. R-CRISPR: A Deep Learning Network to Predict Off-Target Activities with Mismatch, Insertion and Deletion in CRISPR-Cas9 System.
    Niu R; Peng J; Zhang Z; Shang X
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 34946828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Off-target predictions in CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing using deep learning.
    Lin J; Wong KC
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Sep; 34(17):i656-i663. PubMed ID: 30423072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target activities with mismatches and indels based on hybrid neural network.
    Yang Y; Li J; Zou Q; Ruan Y; Feng H
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2023; 21():5039-5048. PubMed ID: 37867973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using traditional machine learning and deep learning methods for on- and off-target prediction in CRISPR/Cas9: a review.
    Sherkatghanad Z; Abdar M; Charlier J; Makarenkov V
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 May; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 37080758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. TransCrispr: Transformer Based Hybrid Model for Predicting CRISPR/Cas9 Single Guide RNA Cleavage Efficiency.
    Wan Y; Jiang Z
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2023; 20(2):1518-1528. PubMed ID: 36006888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gene Therapy with CRISPR/Cas9 Coming to Age for HIV Cure.
    Soriano V
    AIDS Rev; 2017; 19(3):167-172. PubMed ID: 29019352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CRISPRon/off: CRISPR/Cas9 on- and off-target gRNA design.
    Anthon C; Corsi GI; Gorodkin J
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Dec; 38(24):5437-5439. PubMed ID: 36271848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic evaluation of data processing and problem formulation of CRISPR off-target site prediction.
    Yaish O; Asif M; Orenstein Y
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 Sep; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 35595297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of efficiency prediction algorithms and development of ensemble model for CRISPR/Cas9 gRNA selection.
    Chen Y; Wang X
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 38(23):5175-5181. PubMed ID: 36227031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A systematic method for solving data imbalance in CRISPR off-target prediction tasks.
    Guan Z; Jiang Z
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jun; 178():108781. PubMed ID: 38936075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current advances in overcoming obstacles of CRISPR/Cas9 off-target genome editing.
    Aquino-Jarquin G
    Mol Genet Metab; 2021; 134(1-2):77-86. PubMed ID: 34391646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognition of CRISPR/Cas9 off-target sites through ensemble learning of uneven mismatch distributions.
    Peng H; Zheng Y; Zhao Z; Liu T; Li J
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Sep; 34(17):i757-i765. PubMed ID: 30423065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing with low off-target effects in zebrafish.
    Hruscha A; Krawitz P; Rechenberg A; Heinrich V; Hecht J; Haass C; Schmid B
    Development; 2013 Dec; 140(24):4982-7. PubMed ID: 24257628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in sea urchins.
    Lin CY; Oulhen N; Wessel G; Su YH
    Methods Cell Biol; 2019; 151():305-321. PubMed ID: 30948015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deep learning improves the ability of sgRNA off-target propensity prediction.
    Liu Q; Cheng X; Liu G; Li B; Liu X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):51. PubMed ID: 32041517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of CRISPR/Cas9 single guide RNA cleavage efficiency and specificity by attention-based convolutional neural networks.
    Zhang G; Zeng T; Dai Z; Dai X
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2021; 19():1445-1457. PubMed ID: 33841753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comprehensive computational analysis of epigenetic descriptors affecting CRISPR-Cas9 off-target activity.
    Mak JK; Störtz F; Minary P
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Dec; 23(1):805. PubMed ID: 36474180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.