These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3706852)

  • 1. Validity and reliability of biostereometric measurement of the human female breast.
    Sheffer DB; Price TE; Loughry CW; Bolyard BL; Morek WM; Varga RS
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1986; 14(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 3706852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biostereometric analysis for breast cancer detection.
    Proietti-Orlandi F; Varga RS; Sheffer DB; Price TE; Loughry CW
    J Biomed Eng; 1988 May; 10(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 3392975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast volume measurement of 248 women using biostereometric analysis.
    Loughry CW; Sheffer DB; Price TE; Lackney MJ; Bartfai RG; Morek WM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1987 Oct; 80(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 3659165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast cancer detection utilizing biostereometric analysis.
    Loughry CW; Sheffer DB; Hamor RH; Herron RE; Liebelt RA; Proietti-Orlandi F; Varga RS
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1981; 4(1-4):589-94. PubMed ID: 7349825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Right and left breast volume and volume distribution comparisons in normal and tumor-containing breasts.
    Loughry CW; Sheffer DB; Price TE; Bartfai RG; Morek WM; Lackney MJ; Bolyard BR
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1987; 10(3-4):215-21. PubMed ID: 3568018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast volume measurement of 598 women using biostereometric analysis.
    Loughry CW; Sheffer DB; Price TE; Einsporn RL; Bartfai RG; Morek WM; Meli NM
    Ann Plast Surg; 1989 May; 22(5):380-5. PubMed ID: 2729845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry for evaluation of liver volume and shape.
    Claesson G; Fredlund P; Mühlow A; Selvik G
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1978; 19(3):423-32. PubMed ID: 696388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a three-dimensional hand model using 3D stereophotogrammetry: Evaluation of landmark reproducibility.
    Hoevenaren IA; Maal TJ; Krikken E; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Ulrich DJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 May; 68(5):709-16. PubMed ID: 25665488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of leg ulcer treatment with stereophotogrammetry. A pilot study.
    Eriksson G; Eklund AE; Torlegård K; Dauphin E
    Br J Dermatol; 1979 Aug; 101(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 486319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer graphics in facial morphology analysis.
    Leonard MS; Johnson GW; Starfield AM; Speidel TM
    Int J Oral Surg; 1981; 10(Suppl 1):273-5. PubMed ID: 6807892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of biostereometric analysis as a screen for breast cancer.
    Loughry CW; Sheffer DB; Price TE; Morek WM; Einsporn RL
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jun; 26(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 1860759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3D stereophotogrammetry in upper-extremity lymphedema: An accurate diagnostic method.
    Hameeteman M; Verhulst AC; Vreeken RD; Maal TJ; Ulrich DJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Feb; 69(2):241-7. PubMed ID: 26590631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability, validity, and precision of an active stereophotogrammetry system for three-dimensional evaluation of the human torso.
    Paul SM; Chamberlin AP; Hatt C; Nayak AV; Danoff JV
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Dec; 31(10):1337-42. PubMed ID: 19819750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
    Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In a clinimetric analysis, 3D stereophotogrammetry was found to be reliable and valid for measuring scar volume in clinical research.
    Stekelenburg CM; Jaspers ME; Niessen FB; Knol DL; van der Wal MB; de Vet HC; van Zuijlen PP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):782-7. PubMed ID: 25817943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and reproducibility of a newly developed tool for volume measurements of the arm using 3D stereophotogrammetry.
    Verhulst AC; Wesselius TS; Glas HH; Vreeken RD; Ulrich DJO; Maal TJJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Dec; 70(12):1753-1759. PubMed ID: 28874308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stereophotogrammetry in the evaluation of the treatment of scoliosis.
    Saraste H; Ostman A
    Int Orthop; 1986; 10(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 3721656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional cinematography with control object of unknown shape.
    Dapena J; Harman EA; Miller JA
    J Biomech; 1982; 15(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 7061524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stereophotogrammetry of the lumbar spine. A technique for the detection of pseudarthrosis.
    Morris J; Chafetz N; Baumrind S; Genant H; Korn EL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1985 May; 10(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 4049097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multi-view stereophotogrammetry for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction.
    Ju X; Henseler H; Peng MJ; Khambay BS; Ray AK; Ayoub AF
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Mar; 54(2-3):475-84. PubMed ID: 26133282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.