129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37068986)
1. Comparative study between patient specific titanium plates versus conventional miniplates for treatment of mandibular fractures: Randomized clinical trial.
Taalab DA; Shehab AF; Atef M; Shehab MF
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2023 Apr; 51(4):217-223. PubMed ID: 37068986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of bite force evaluation for mandibular angle fracture fixation by conventional miniplates versus new design miniplates: a clinical study.
Gamit M; Patel Y; Sood R; Vadera H; Savjani K; Bhatti Z
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 28(2):645-652. PubMed ID: 37740128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional v/s standard titanium miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures--a randomized clinical study.
Sehgal S; Ramanujam L; Prasad K; Krishnappa R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1292-9. PubMed ID: 24780350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing bite force in 2-mm locking plates versus 2-mm standard plates in treatment of mandibular fractures.
Agarwal M; Mohammad S; Singh RK; Singh V
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21272972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of functional outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction between titanium and absorbable plates and screws for fixation of mandibular fractures: A one-year prospective study.
Leno MB; Liu SY; Chen CT; Liao HT
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 May; 45(5):704-709. PubMed ID: 28318918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. "A comparative evaluation between single noncompression titanium miniplate and three dimensional titanium miniplate in treatment of mandibular angle fracture"--a randomized prospective study.
Vineeth K; Lalitha RM; Prasad K; Ranganath K; Shwetha V; Singh J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 41(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 22809633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital technology revolutionizing mandibular fracture treatment: a comparative analysis of patient-specific plates and conventional titanium plates.
Che SA; Byun SH; Cho SW; Yi SM; Park SY; On SW; Kim JC; Malakuti I; Yang BE
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Jul; 28(8):417. PubMed ID: 38972945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of condylar position in anterior mandibular fractures using 3 dimensional miniplate osteosynthesis versus conventional miniplates: Randomized clinical trial.
Mohammad OA; Ashour EM; Hassanein FAA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 50(1):61-69. PubMed ID: 34756733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 3D plate and locking plate in treatment of mandibular fracture-a clinical study.
Aggarwal S; Singh M; Modi P; Walia E; Aggarwal R
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 21(4):383-390. PubMed ID: 28785906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of two internal fixation techniques for mandibular parasymphyseal fractures comparing conventional titanium miniplates with customised titanium CRB omega miniplates: a prospective study.
Bande CR; Kurawar KR; Mishra A; Joshi A; Goel M; Mahajan MR
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 56(6):520-524. PubMed ID: 29853197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Z-shaped Miniplates vs Conventional Miniplates for Fixation of Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures.
Abdou Ata MAE; Marzook HAM; Tawfik MA; Elmissiry ZMA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Oct; 24(10):761-770. PubMed ID: 38152909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparative Assessment of the Management of Mandibular Angle Fractures Using 3D Plates and 2D Miniplates.
Singh R; Singh R; Jayam C; Nazeer J; Iqubal MA; Singh S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Apr; 21(4):400-403. PubMed ID: 32584276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of 2D miniplates and 3D miniplates fixation in mandibular angle fracture - A clinical study.
Singh R; ; Singh A; Singh DK; Nazeer J; Singh S
Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(1):134-137. PubMed ID: 32246696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Titanium Lag Screw Versus Miniplate Fixation in the Treatment of Anterior Mandibular Fractures.
Tiwari M; Meshram V; Lambade P; Fernandes G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 May; 77(5):1031-1039. PubMed ID: 30763527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of Bite Force in Patients Treated with 2.0-mm Traditional Miniplates versus 2.0-mm Locking Plates for Mandibular Fracture.
Rastogi S; Reddy MP; Swarup AG; Swarup D; Choudhury R
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr; 2016 Mar; 9(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 26889350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Management of mandibular interforaminal fractures using 3 dimensional locking and standard titanium miniplates - a comparative preliminary report of 10 cases.
Jain MK; Sankar K; Ramesh C; Bhatta R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e475-8. PubMed ID: 22487270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes Using Delta Plates and Conventional Miniplates for Internal Fixation of Mandibular Condylar Fractures in Adults.
Ahuja SA; Galinde J; Asnani U; Mistry YA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 76(6):1255-1266. PubMed ID: 29360455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of intermaxillary fixation screws and noncompression miniplates in the treatment of mandibular fractures: a prospective clinical study.
Anslem O; Eyituoyo O; Olabode OV; Ademola OA; Adesina AO
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 21(2):233-240. PubMed ID: 28386782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Comparative Evaluation of Fixation Techniques in Anterior Mandibular Fractures Using 2.0 mm Monocortical Titanium Miniplates Versus 2.4 mm Cortical Titanium Lag Screws.
Goyal M; Jhamb A; Chawla S; Marya K; Dua JS; Yadav S
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2012 Dec; 11(4):442-50. PubMed ID: 24293938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The three-dimensional titanium miniplate rigid fixation in the treatment of fracture of maxilla].
Lai G
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Jul; 11(4):196-8. PubMed ID: 9867976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
