BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37069602)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of the screen-and-treat strategies using HPV test linked to thermal ablation for cervical cancer prevention in China: a modeling study.
    Zhao XL; Zhao S; Xia CF; Hu SY; Duan XZ; Liu ZH; Wang YY; You TT; Gao M; Qiao YL; Basu P; Zhao FH
    BMC Med; 2023 Apr; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 37069602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of using human papillomavirus 16/18 genotype triage in cervical cancer screening.
    Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Goodman KA; Santas CC; Huh WK
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Nov; 119(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 20713299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Budget impact analysis of cervical cancer screening in Portugal: comparison of cytology and primary HPV screening strategies.
    Pista A; Costa C; Saldanha C; Moutinho JAF; Moutinho JM; Arrobas F; Catalão C; Kempers J
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):235. PubMed ID: 30808324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
    C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative performance evaluation of different HPV tests and triaging strategies using self-samples and feasibility assessment of thermal ablation in 'colposcopy and treat' approach: A population-based study in rural China.
    Zhao XL; Xu XQ; Duan XZ; Rezhake R; Hu SY; Wang Y; Xia CF; Zhang X; Qiao YL; Sankaranarayanan R; Zhao FH; Basu P
    Int J Cancer; 2020 Sep; 147(5):1275-1285. PubMed ID: 31970767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
    Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
    Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Management of HPV-positive women in cervical screening using results from two consecutive screening rounds.
    Polman NJ; Veldhuijzen NJ; Heideman DAM; Snijders PJF; Meijer CJLM; Berkhof J
    Int J Cancer; 2019 May; 144(9):2339-2346. PubMed ID: 30565673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lower cost strategies for triage of human papillomavirus DNA-positive women.
    Qiao YL; Jeronimo J; Zhao FH; Schweizer J; Chen W; Valdez M; Lu P; Zhang X; Kang LN; Bansil P; Paul P; Mahoney C; Berard-Bergery M; Bai P; Peck R; Li J; Chen F; Stoler MH; Castle PE
    Int J Cancer; 2014 Jun; 134(12):2891-901. PubMed ID: 24248915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost effectiveness analysis of HPV primary screening and dual stain cytology triage compared with cervical cytology.
    Termrungruanglert W; Khemapech N; Tantitamit T; Havanond P
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 30(2):e17. PubMed ID: 30740950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of HPV-16 and HPV-18 Genotyping and Cytological Testing as Triage Testing Within Human Papillomavirus-Based Screening in Mexico.
    Torres-Ibarra L; Cuzick J; Lorincz AT; Spiegelman D; Lazcano-Ponce E; Franco EL; Moscicki AB; Mahmud SM; Wheeler CM; Rivera-Paredez B; Hernández-López R; León-Maldonado L; Salmerón J;
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Nov; 2(11):e1915781. PubMed ID: 31747033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protocol for Compass: a randomised controlled trial of primary HPV testing versus cytology screening for cervical cancer in HPV-unvaccinated and vaccinated women aged 25-69 years living in Australia.
    Canfell K; Saville M; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Brotherton J; Heley S; Castle PE
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e016700. PubMed ID: 29374658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of different strategies for the triage to colposcopy of women tested high-risk HPV positive on self-collected cervicovaginal samples.
    Chatzistamatiou K; Tsertanidou A; Moysiadis T; Mouchtaropoulou E; Pasentsis K; Skenderi A; Stamatopoulos K; Agorastos T
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Sep; 162(3):560-568. PubMed ID: 34210517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus triage approaches among vaccinated women in Norway: A model-based analysis.
    Portnoy A; Pedersen K; Sy S; Tropé A; Engesaeter B; Kim JJ; Burger EA
    Int J Cancer; 2024 Mar; 154(6):1073-1081. PubMed ID: 38088449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of human papillomavirus genotyping and cytology triage, COMPACT Study: Design, methods and baseline results in 14 642 women.
    Aoyama-Kikawa S; Fujita H; Hanley SJB; Kasamo M; Kikuchi K; Torigoe T; Matsuno Y; Tamakoshi A; Sasaki T; Matsuura M; Kato Y; Dong P; Watari H; Saito T; Sengoku K; Sakuragi N
    Cancer Sci; 2018 Jun; 109(6):2003-2012. PubMed ID: 29660849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maximizing the cost-effectiveness of cervical screening in the context of routine HPV vaccination by optimizing screening strategies with respect to vaccine uptake: a modeling analysis.
    Choi HCW; Leung K; Chan KKL; Bai Y; Jit M; Wu JT
    BMC Med; 2023 Feb; 21(1):48. PubMed ID: 36765349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based cervical cancer screening in the public health system in Nicaragua.
    Campos NG; Mvundura M; Jeronimo J; Holme F; Vodicka E; Kim JJ
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jun; 7(6):e015048. PubMed ID: 28619772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Triaging HPV-positive, cytology-negative cervical cancer screening results with extended HPV genotyping and p16
    Song F; Yan P; Huang X; Wang C; Qu X; Du H; Wu R
    BMC Infect Dis; 2021 Apr; 21(1):400. PubMed ID: 33931022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Defining Optimal Triage Strategies for hrHPV Screen-Positive Women-An Evaluation of HPV 16/18 Genotyping, Cytology, and p16/Ki-67 Cytoimmunochemistry.
    Stanczuk GA; Baxter GJ; Currie H; Forson W; Lawrence JR; Cuschieri K; Wilson A; Patterson L; Govan L; Black J; Palmer T; Arbyn M
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2017 Nov; 26(11):1629-1635. PubMed ID: 28887297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical relevance of partial HPV16/18 genotyping in stratifying HPV-positive women attending routine cervical cancer screening: a population-based cohort study.
    Gori S; Battagello J; Gustinucci D; Campari C; Zorzi M; Frayle H; Passamonti B; Sartori G; Bulletti S; Fodero C; Cesarini E; Faggiano R; Del Mistro A
    BJOG; 2021 Jul; 128(8):1353-1362. PubMed ID: 33326680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Performance of vaginal self-sampling high-risk HPV genotyping as primary and combining cytology or viral load as secondary in cervical cancer screening].
    Guo CL; Luo HX; Wang C; Qu XF; Yang B; Belinson JL; Du H; Wu RF
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 56(4):271-279. PubMed ID: 33902239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.