These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Should I Trust the Artificial Intelligence to Recruit? Recruiters' Perceptions and Behavior When Faced With Algorithm-Based Recommendation Systems During Resume Screening. Lacroux A; Martin-Lacroux C Front Psychol; 2022; 13():895997. PubMed ID: 35874355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Criminal problem-solving and civil dependency court policies regarding medications for opioid use disorder. Andraka-Christou B; Clark MH; Atkins DN; Del Pozo B Subst Abus; 2022; 43(1):425-432. PubMed ID: 34236297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Algorithms in the court: does it matter which part of the judicial decision-making is automated? Barysė D; Sarel R Artif Intell Law (Dordr); 2023 Jan; ():1-30. PubMed ID: 36643574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mental health court and assisted outpatient treatment: perceived coercion, procedural justice, and program impact. Munetz MR; Ritter C; Teller JL; Bonfine N Psychiatr Serv; 2014 Mar; 65(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 24036617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perspective Differences in Trial Process: A Comparison of Judges, Juries and Litigants. Jones AM; Jones SE; Duron A Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2019; 26(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 31984066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Front-Stage Stars and Backstage Producers: The Role of Judges in Problem-Solving Courts(). Portillo S; Rudes D; Viglione J; Nelson M; Taxman F Vict Offender; 2013 Jan; 8(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 23397430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Time-Based Stress and Procedural Justice: Can Transparency Mitigate the Effects of Algorithmic Compensation in Gig Work? Semujanga B; Parent-Rocheleau X Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2024 Jan; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 38248549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Impact of Waiver to Adult Court on Youths' Perceptions of Procedural Justice. Kaasa SO; Tatar JR; Dezember A; Cauffman E Psychol Public Policy Law; 2018 Nov; 24(4):418-429. PubMed ID: 30906181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The current judicial interpretation of the 1969 abortion law. Dehler D Cathol Hosp; 1979; 7(6):20-1. PubMed ID: 10245754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Justice blocks and predictability of U.S. Supreme Court votes. Guimerà R; Sales-Pardo M PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27188. PubMed ID: 22096533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trust in AI: why we should be designing for APPROPRIATE reliance. Benda NC; Novak LL; Reale C; Ancker JS J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Dec; 29(1):207-212. PubMed ID: 34725693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trust, Confidence, and Expertise in a Judge-Advisor System. Sniezek JA; Van Swol LM Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2001 Mar; 84(2):288-307. PubMed ID: 11277673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Importance of Perceived Procedural Justice Among Defendants With a Non-Western Background Involved in Dutch Criminal Cases. Ansems LFM; van den Bos K; Mak E Front Psychol; 2021; 12():746364. PubMed ID: 34912270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How Terminology Affects Users' Responses to System Failures. Candrian C; Scherer A Hum Factors; 2024 Aug; 66(8):2082-2103. PubMed ID: 37734726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Algorithmic Fairness in the Roberts Court Era. Wagner JK Pac Symp Biocomput; 2023; 28():519-530. PubMed ID: 36541005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]