These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37071219)

  • 1. Accuracy and eligibility of Bonwill⁃Hawley arch form established by CBCT image for dental crowding measurement: a comparative study with the conventional brass wire and caliper methods.
    Wang XM; Meng WY; Wang WN; Huo YF; Xue H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):3961-3972. PubMed ID: 37071219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity.
    Liang YM; Rutchakitprakarn L; Kuang SH; Wu TY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dental crowding: a comparison of three methods of assessment.
    Johal AS; Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Oct; 19(5):543-51. PubMed ID: 9386340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of cone-beam computed tomography image artifacts on the determination of dental arch measurements.
    Gamba TO; Oliveira ML; Flores IL; Cruz AD; Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F; Lopes SL
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):274-8. PubMed ID: 23924404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.
    Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
    Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.
    Baumgaertel S; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the accuracy of laser-scanned models and 3-dimensional rendered cone-beam computed tomographic images compared to digital caliper measurements on plaster casts.
    Yousefi F; Shokri A; Zahedi F; Farhadian M
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Dec; 51(4):429-438. PubMed ID: 34988004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability and intra-examiner agreement of orthodontic model analysis with a digital caliper on plaster and printed dental models.
    Koretsi V; Kirschbauer C; Proff P; Kirschneck C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3387-3396. PubMed ID: 30539294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy and reproducibility of permanent dentitions and dental arch measurements: comparing three different digital models with a plaster study cast.
    Al-Mashraqi AA; Alhammadi MS; Gadi AA; Altharawi RA; Zamim KAH; Halboub E
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 34931771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation and agreement of a digital and conventional method to measure arch parameters.
    Nawi N; Mohamed AM; Marizan Nor M; Ashar NA
    J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Jan; 79(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 29116344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semi-automatic and robust determination of dental arch form in dental cone-beam CT with B-spline approximation.
    Bae M; Park JW; Kim N
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Apr; 172():95-101. PubMed ID: 30902131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of dental arch forms created from assessment of teeth, alveolar bone, and the overlying soft tissue.
    O'Neil R; Kau CH
    J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Nov; 82(6):413-421. PubMed ID: 33740063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kim J; Heo G; Lagravère MO
    Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 23957664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor.
    Redlich M; Weinstock T; Abed Y; Schneor R; Holdstein Y; Fischer A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18416750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Exploring a new method for superimposition of pre-treatment and post-treatment mandibular digital dental casts in adults].
    Dai FF; Liu Y; Xu TM; Chen G
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 29643526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance.
    Tai K; Hotokezaka H; Park JH; Tai H; Miyajima K; Choi M; Kai LM; Mishima K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):262.e1-262.e11; discussion 262-3. PubMed ID: 20816294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of accuracy and repeatability using CBCT and a dental scanner by means of 3D software.
    Kim SR; Kim CM; Jeong ID; Kim WC; Kim HY; Kim JH
    Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 28294206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.