These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37072460)

  • 1. Accounting for endogenous effects in decision-making with a non-linear diffusion decision model.
    Hoxha I; Chevallier S; Ciarchi M; Glasauer S; Delorme A; Amorim MA
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6323. PubMed ID: 37072460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in inter-temporal and risky choice: A case study in medial orbitofrontal cortex lesion patients and controls.
    Peters J; D'Esposito M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Apr; 16(4):e1007615. PubMed ID: 32310962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding perceptual judgment in autism spectrum disorder using the drift diffusion model.
    Pirrone A; Dickinson A; Gomez R; Stafford T; Milne E
    Neuropsychology; 2017 Feb; 31(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 27732040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Value certainty in drift-diffusion models of preferential choice.
    Lee DG; Usher M
    Psychol Rev; 2023 Apr; 130(3):790-806. PubMed ID: 34694845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The speed and accuracy of perceptual decisions in a random-tone pitch task.
    Mulder MJ; Keuken MC; van Maanen L; Boekel W; Forstmann BU; Wagenmakers EJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):1048-58. PubMed ID: 23572205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal decision making in neural inhibition models.
    van Ravenzwaaij D; van der Maas HL; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Jan; 119(1):201-15. PubMed ID: 22103672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Bayesian Reformulation of the Extended Drift-Diffusion Model in Perceptual Decision Making.
    Fard PR; Park H; Warkentin A; Kiebel SJ; Bitzer S
    Front Comput Neurosci; 2017; 11():29. PubMed ID: 28553219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal dynamics of decision making: A synthesis of computational and neurophysiological approaches.
    Harris A; Hutcherson CA
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2022 May; 13(3):e1586. PubMed ID: 34854573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Drift-diffusion models for multiple-alternative forced-choice decision making.
    Roxin A
    J Math Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 9(1):5. PubMed ID: 31270706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Residual Information of Previous Decision Affects Evidence Accumulation in Current Decision.
    Olianezhad F; Zabbah S; Tohidi-Moghaddam M; Ebrahimpour R
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2019; 13():9. PubMed ID: 30804764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Overcomplete Approach to Fitting Drift-Diffusion Decision Models to Trial-By-Trial Data.
    Feltgen Q; Daunizeau J
    Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():531316. PubMed ID: 33898982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The neural implausibility of the diffusion decision model doesn't matter for cognitive psychometrics, but the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model is better.
    Wang JS; Donkin C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Dec; 31(6):2724-2736. PubMed ID: 38743214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response Time Distributions and the Accumulation of Visual Evidence in Freely Moving Mice.
    Treviño M; Medina-Coss Y León R; Lezama E
    Neuroscience; 2022 Oct; 501():25-41. PubMed ID: 35995337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Support for the Time-Varying Drift Rate Model of Perceptual Discrimination in Dynamic and Static Noise Using Bayesian Model-Fitting Methodology.
    Deakin J; Schofield A; Heinke D
    Entropy (Basel); 2024 Jul; 26(8):. PubMed ID: 39202112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling 2-alternative forced-choice tasks: Accounting for both magnitude and difference effects.
    Ratcliff R; Voskuilen C; Teodorescu A
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Jun; 103():1-22. PubMed ID: 29501775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing the drift-diffusion model.
    Fudenberg D; Newey W; Strack P; Strzalecki T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Dec; 117(52):33141-33148. PubMed ID: 33310903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cortical β Power Reflects a Neural Implementation of Decision Boundary Collapse in Speeded Decisions.
    Kirschner H; Fischer AG; Danielmeier C; Klein TA; Ullsperger M
    J Neurosci; 2024 Mar; 44(13):. PubMed ID: 38360748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic Decision Making: Learning Processes and New Research Directions.
    Gonzalez C; Fakhari P; Busemeyer J
    Hum Factors; 2017 Aug; 59(5):713-721. PubMed ID: 28548893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reward rate optimization in two-alternative decision making: empirical tests of theoretical predictions.
    Simen P; Contreras D; Buck C; Hu P; Holmes P; Cohen JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1865-97. PubMed ID: 19968441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Drift-Diffusion Model Reveals Impaired Reward-Based Perceptual Decision-Making Processes Associated with Depression in Late Childhood and Early Adolescent Girls.
    Pitliya RJ; Nelson BD; Hajcak G; Jin J
    Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol; 2022 Nov; 50(11):1515-1528. PubMed ID: 35678933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.