These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37072566)

  • 1. Bandpass Shape of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Ratio Functions Reflects Cochlear Frequency Tuning in Normal-Hearing Mice.
    Dewey JB; Shera CA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2023 Jun; 24(3):305-324. PubMed ID: 37072566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Similar Tuning of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Ratio Functions and Cochlear Vibrations in Mice.
    Dewey JB; Shera CA
    AIP Conf Proc; 2024 Feb; 3062(1):. PubMed ID: 38516507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrically evoked cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T; Nuttall AL; Miller JM
    Hear Res; 1996 Dec; 102(1-2):43-50. PubMed ID: 8951449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochlear tuning estimates from level ratio functions of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wilson US; Browning-Kamins J; Durante AS; Boothalingam S; Moleti A; Sisto R; Dhar S
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Nov; 60(11):890-899. PubMed ID: 33612052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intracochlear distortion products are broadly generated by outer hair cells but their contributions to otoacoustic emissions are spatially restricted.
    Bowling T; Wen H; Meenderink SWF; Dong W; Meaud J
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):13651. PubMed ID: 34211051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Otoacoustic emissions without somatic motility: can stereocilia mechanics drive the mammalian cochlea?
    Liberman MC; Zuo J; Guinan JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1649-55. PubMed ID: 15478431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
    Abel C; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of the 2f
    Wen H; Bowling T; Meaud J
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():127-140. PubMed ID: 29801982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: results from cochlear mechanics simulation.
    Liu YW; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):951-61. PubMed ID: 23363112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1,f2 area study.
    Knight RD; Kemp DT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):457-73. PubMed ID: 10641654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physiopathological significance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions at 2f1-f2 produced by high- versus low-level stimuli.
    Avan P; Bonfils P; Gilain L; Mom T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):430-41. PubMed ID: 12558280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency selectivity of the human cochlea: Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Manley GA; van Dijk P
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():53-62. PubMed ID: 27139323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency specificity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions produced by high-level tones despite inefficient cochlear electromechanical feedback.
    Carvalho S; Mom T; Gilain L; Avan P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1639-48. PubMed ID: 15478430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low-frequency sound exposure causes reversible long-term changes of cochlear transfer characteristics.
    Drexl M; Otto L; Wiegrebe L; Marquardt T; Gürkov R; Krause E
    Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 332():87-94. PubMed ID: 26706707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical tuning and amplification within the apex of the guinea pig cochlea.
    Recio-Spinoso A; Oghalai JS
    J Physiol; 2017 Jul; 595(13):4549-4561. PubMed ID: 28382742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.