118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37073916)
1. A Comparative Analysis of Voids and Sealing Ability of Different Obturating Techniques Using CBCT.
Singh A; Anand S; Prakash R; Ahmed A; Dhawan J
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Oct; 23(10):1021-1025. PubMed ID: 37073916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comparative Volumetric Evaluation of Four Obturating Techniques in Primary Teeth Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Singh A; Gupta N; Agarwal N; Kumar D; Anand A
Pediatr Dent; 2017 Mar; 39(2):11-16. PubMed ID: 28390451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Different Root Canal Obturation Methods in Primary Teeth Using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography.
Singh R; Chaudhary S; Manuja N; Chaitra TR; Sinha AA
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(5):462-9. PubMed ID: 26551371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Volumetric Evaluation of Different Obturation Techniques in Primary Teeth Using Spiral Computed Tomography.
Nagaveni NB; Yadav S; Poornima P; Reddy VS; Roshan NM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 28052215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Volumetric evaluation of various obturation techniques in primary teeth using cone beam computed tomography - An
Nagaveni NB; Yadav S; Poornima P; Bharath KP; Mathew MG; Naveen Kumar PG
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(3):244-248. PubMed ID: 28762351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical efficacy of various root canal obturating methods in primary teeth: a comparative study.
Grover R; Mehra M; Pandit IK; Srivastava N; Gugnani N; Gupta M
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jun; 14(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 23758458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of three obturation techniques in primary incisors using digital intra-oral receptor and C.B.C.T-an in vitro study.
Akhil JEJ; Prashant B; Shashibushan KK
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):689-696. PubMed ID: 29744724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of different obturation techniques for primary molars by digital radiography.
Memarpour M; Shahidi S; Meshki R
Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 23756307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro comparison of three delivery techniques for obturation of root canals in primary molars.
Walia T; Ghanbari AH; Mathew S; Ziadlou AH
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2017 Feb; 18(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 27885586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Obturation Techniques in Deciduous Teeth Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography: An
Nezam S; Mukherjee CG; Shukla JN; Jha A; Khan SA; Tanwar AS
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021; 14(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 34326588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Evaluation of Three Obturating Techniques in Primary Molars: An
Ellana Jermiah J; Rao A; Srikant N; Rao A; Suprabha BS
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 43(6):372-375. PubMed ID: 31657988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of root canal filling quality with apical negative pressure.
Li J; Bergeron BE; Chao J; Xu T; Tay FR; Fan B
J Dent; 2020 Sep; 100():103431. PubMed ID: 32682921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The association between complete absence of post-treatment periapical lesion and quality of root canal filling.
Liang YH; Li G; Shemesh H; Wesselink PR; Wu MK
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Dec; 16(6):1619-26. PubMed ID: 22228024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital Radiographic Evaluation of the Quality of Different Root Canal Obturation Techniques in Deciduous Mandibular Molars after Preparation with Rotary Technique.
Jafarzadeh M; Saatchi M; Jafarnejadi P; Gooran M
J Dent (Shiraz); 2019 Sep; 20(3):152-158. PubMed ID: 31579688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of cone beam computerized tomography voxel size and the presence of root filling on the assessment of middle mesial canals in mandibular molar teeth.
Çimen T; Düzgün S; Akyüz İE; Topçuoğlu HS
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Jun; 28(7):394. PubMed ID: 38916762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of CBCT-based volumetric distortion and beam hardening artefacts on the assessment of root canal filling quality in isthmus-containing molars.
Rodrigues CT; Jacobs R; Vasconcelos KF; Lambrechts P; Rubira-Bullen IRF; Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos C; Duarte MAH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Jul; 50(5):20200503. PubMed ID: 33400563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-Dimensional Measurement of Obturation Quality of Bioceramic Materials in Filling Artificial Internal Root Resorption Cavities Using Different Obturation Techniques: An In Vitro Comparative Study.
Sharki AM; Ali AH
J Endod; 2024 Jul; 50(7):997-1003. PubMed ID: 38588977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calcium hydroxide dressings using different preparation and application modes: density and dissolution by simulated tissue pressure.
Peters CI; Koka RS; Highsmith S; Peters OA
Int Endod J; 2005 Dec; 38(12):889-95. PubMed ID: 16343116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe, jiffy tube, and local anesthetic syringe in obturation of primary teeth: An in vitro study.
Hiremath MC; Srivastava P
J Nat Sci Biol Med; 2016; 7(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 27433062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Volumetric analysis of root canal fillings in primary teeth using spiral computed tomography: an in vitro study.
Asokan S; Sooriaprakas C; Raghu V; Bairavi R
J Dent Child (Chic); 2012; 79(2):46-8. PubMed ID: 22828756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
