These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37073943)

  • 1. The Effectiveness of Different Irrigation Techniques on Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Primary Mandibular Second Molars: An
    Hachem CE; Nehme W; Kaloustian MK; Ghosn N; Daou M; Zogheib C; Karam M; Mhanna R; Macaluso V; Kharouf N; Chedid JCA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1173-1179. PubMed ID: 37073943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of irrigant activation devices and conventional needle irrigation on smear layer and debris removal in curved canals. (Smear layer removal from irrigant activation using SEM).
    Andreani Y; Gad BT; Cocks TC; Harrison J; Keresztes ME; Pomfret JK; Rees EB; Ma D; Baloun BL; Rahimi M
    Aust Endod J; 2021 Aug; 47(2):143-149. PubMed ID: 33682268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and File agitation on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a comparative study.
    Elnaghy AM; Mandorah A; Elsaka SE
    Odontology; 2017 Apr; 105(2):178-183. PubMed ID: 27206916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of different activated irrigation techniques on debris and smear layer removal from curved root canals: a SEM evaluation.
    Haupt F; Meinel M; Gunawardana A; Hülsmann M
    Aust Endod J; 2020 Apr; 46(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 30907051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation.
    Urban K; Donnermeyer D; Schäfer E; Bürklein S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Dec; 21(9):2681-2687. PubMed ID: 28185091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.
    Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
    Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
    Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of three irrigation methods: SWEEPS, ultrasonic, and traditional irrigation, in smear layer and debris removal abilities in the root canal, beyond the fractured instrument.
    Vatanpour M; Toursavadkouhi S; Sajjad S
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Mar; 37():102707. PubMed ID: 34971819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic irrigation on smear layer removal from root canals in a closed apex in vitro model.
    Andrabi SM; Kumar A; Zia A; Iftekhar H; Alam S; Siddiqui S
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Aug; 5(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 23595996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of oxidative potential water as a root canal irrigant.
    Hata G; Hayami S; Weine FS; Toda T
    Int Endod J; 2001 Jun; 34(4):308-17. PubMed ID: 11482143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Micro-CT evaluation of four final irrigation protocols on hard-tissue debris removal from mesial roots of mandibular molars containing isthmus.
    de Mattos de Araujo BM; Cruz ATG; Piasecki L; Webber M; Carneiro E; Westphalen VPD; da Silva Neto UX
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Oct; 26(10):6121-6128. PubMed ID: 35650363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study.
    Mancini M; Cerroni L; Iorio L; Armellin E; Conte G; Cianconi L
    J Endod; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1456-60. PubMed ID: 24139274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of four different irrigation techniques combined with 60 °C 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA in smear layer removal.
    Guo X; Miao H; Li L; Zhang S; Zhou D; Lu Y; Wu L
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 Sep; 14():114. PubMed ID: 25201549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of final irrigant protocols for debris removal from simulated canal irregularities.
    Martins Justo A; Abreu da Rosa R; Santini MF; Cardoso Ferreira MB; Pereira JR; Húngaro Duarte MA; Reis Só MV
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2009-14. PubMed ID: 25266470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher file on smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation].
    Xin Y; Yang J; Song KY
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 37(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 30854818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FESEM evaluation of smear layer removal from conservatively shaped canals: laser activated irrigation (PIPS and SWEEPS) compared to sonic and passive ultrasonic activation-an ex vivo study.
    Mancini M; Cerroni L; Palopoli P; Olivi G; Olivi M; Buoni C; Cianconi L
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Feb; 21(1):81. PubMed ID: 33618701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Smear Layer Removal Using Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and Different Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite.
    Orlowski NB; Schimdt TF; Teixeira CDS; Garcia LDFR; Savaris JM; Tay FR; Bortoluzzi EA
    J Endod; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1738-1744. PubMed ID: 32721483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of laser and ultrasonic irrigation activation methods on smear and debris removal in traditional and conservative endodontic access cavities.
    Gündüz H; Özlek E
    Lasers Med Sci; 2023 Jun; 38(1):148. PubMed ID: 37358660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of smear layer and debris removal by stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) of sodium hypochlorite.
    Plotino G; Colangeli M; Özyürek T; DeDeus G; Panzetta C; Castagnola R; Grande NM; Marigo L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jan; 25(1):237-245. PubMed ID: 32500405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.