173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37075546)
1. Comparison of conventional socket attachment and bone-anchored prosthesis for persons living with transfemoral amputation - mobility and quality of life.
Welke B; Hurschler C; Schwarze M; Jakubowitz E; Aschoff HH; Örgel M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2023 May; 105():105954. PubMed ID: 37075546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Osseointegrated Prosthetic Implants for People With Lower-Limb Amputation: A Health Technology Assessment.
Ontario Health (Quality)
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2019; 19(7):1-126. PubMed ID: 31911825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Walking ability of individuals fitted with transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses: A comparative study of gait parameters.
Ranaldi S; Naaim A; Marchis C; Robert T; Dumas R; Conforto S; Frossard L
Clin Rehabil; 2023 Dec; 37(12):1670-1683. PubMed ID: 37350084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of prosthetic suspension on gait and cortical modulations is persons with a transfemoral amputation: socket-suspended versus bone-anchored prosthesis.
Kooiman V; van der Cruijsen J; Leijendekkers R; Verdonschot N; Solis-Escalante T; Weerdesteyn V
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2024 Mar; 21(1):35. PubMed ID: 38454427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Walking ability and quality of life in subjects with transfemoral amputation: a comparison of osseointegration with socket prostheses.
Van de Meent H; Hopman MT; Frölke JP
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Nov; 94(11):2174-8. PubMed ID: 23774380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of prosthetic costs and service between osseointegrated and conventional suspended transfemoral prostheses.
Haggstrom EE; Hansson E; Hagberg K
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Apr; 37(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 22907950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A scoring system to evaluate stability of percutaneous osseointegrated implants for transfemoral amputation with validation in the ITAP clinical trial.
Ahmed K; Blunn GW
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2024 Apr; 238(4):412-422. PubMed ID: 38415608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Constructing an Osseointegrated Prosthetic Leg.
Kafedzic H; Rozbruch SR; Reif TJ; Hoellwarth JS
JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2024; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38406563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of life of persons with transfemoral amputation: Comparison of socket prostheses and osseointegrated prostheses.
Pospiech PT; Wendlandt R; Aschoff HH; Ziegert S; Schulz AP
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Feb; 45(1):20-25. PubMed ID: 33834741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of prosthetic mobility and balance in transfemoral amputees with bone-anchored prosthesis vs. socket prosthesis.
Gailey RS; Kristal A; Al Muderis M; Lučarević J; Clemens S; Applegate EB; Isaacson BM; Pasquina PF; Symsack A; Gaunaurd IA
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2023 Apr; 47(2):130-136. PubMed ID: 36701197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of bone-anchored prostheses using osseointegrated fixation: Myth or reality?
Frossard LA; Merlo G; Burkett B; Quincey T; Berg D
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Jun; 42(3):318-327. PubMed ID: 29119860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oxygen consumption and gait dynamics in transfemoral bone-anchored prosthesis users compared to socket-prosthesis users: A cross-sectional study.
Kooiman V; Haket L; Verdonschot N; Leijendekkers R; Weerdesteyn V
Gait Posture; 2023 Jun; 103():12-18. PubMed ID: 37075553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Osseoperception in transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems (TOPS) after transfemoral amputation: a prospective study.
Örgel M; Elareibi M; Graulich T; Krettek C; Neunaber C; Aschoff HH; Ranker A; Winkelmann M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Feb; 143(2):603-610. PubMed ID: 34345935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of functional outcome and patient satisfaction between patients with socket prosthesis and patients treated with transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems (TOPS) after transfemoral amputation.
Örgel M; Schwarze F; Graulich T; Krettek C; Weidemann F; Aschoff HH; Winkelmann M; Ranker A
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2022 Dec; 48(6):4867-4876. PubMed ID: 35717545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vibrotactile evaluation: osseointegrated versus socket-suspended transfemoral prostheses.
Häggström E; Hagberg K; Rydevik B; Brånemark R
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(10):1423-34. PubMed ID: 24699977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Osseointegrated prostheses improve balance and balance confidence in individuals with unilateral transfemoral limb loss.
Gaffney BMM; Davis-Wilson HC; Christiansen CL; Awad ME; Lev G; Tracy J; Stoneback JW
Gait Posture; 2023 Feb; 100():132-138. PubMed ID: 36521257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation: Part 2 Description and Preliminary evaluation.
Fatone S; Caldwell R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):246-250. PubMed ID: 28132589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The First FDA Approved Early Feasibility Study of a Novel Percutaneous Bone Anchored Prosthesis for Transfemoral Amputees: A Prospective 1-year Follow-up Cohort Study.
Sinclair S; Beck JP; Webster J; Agarwal J; Gillespie B; Stevens P; Gililland J; Kubiak E
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 Nov; 103(11):2092-2104. PubMed ID: 35908658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revision Amputation with Press-Fit Osseointegration for Transfemoral Amputees.
Hoellwarth JS; Reif TJ; Rozbruch SR
JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2022; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 36741033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transcutaneous Osseointegrated Prosthesis Systems (TOPS) for Rehabilitation After Lower Limb Loss: Surgical Pearls.
Aschoff HH; Örgel M; Sass M; Fischer DC; Mittlmeier T
JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2024; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38268768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
