158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37075600)
1. A comparative study of the inter-observer variability on Gleason grading against Deep Learning-based approaches for prostate cancer.
Marrón-Esquivel JM; Duran-Lopez L; Linares-Barranco A; Dominguez-Morales JP
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Jun; 159():106856. PubMed ID: 37075600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Semi-supervised training of deep convolutional neural networks with heterogeneous data and few local annotations: An experiment on prostate histopathology image classification.
Marini N; Otálora S; Müller H; Atzori M
Med Image Anal; 2021 Oct; 73():102165. PubMed ID: 34303169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Going deeper through the Gleason scoring scale: An automatic end-to-end system for histology prostate grading and cribriform pattern detection.
Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Sales MA; Molina R; Naranjo V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105637. PubMed ID: 32653747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies.
Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deep Learning-Based Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Histopathology Images-Role of Multiscale Decision Aggregation and Data Augmentation.
Karimi D; Nir G; Fazli L; Black PC; Goldenberg L; Salcudean SE
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 May; 24(5):1413-1426. PubMed ID: 31567104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic diagnosis and grading of Prostate Cancer with weakly supervised learning on whole slide images.
Xiang J; Wang X; Wang X; Zhang J; Yang S; Yang W; Han X; Liu Y
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Jan; 152():106340. PubMed ID: 36481762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies.
Lucas M; Jansen I; Savci-Heijink CD; Meijer SL; de Boer OJ; van Leeuwen TG; de Bruin DM; Marquering HA
Virchows Arch; 2019 Jul; 475(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 31098801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial intelligence assistance significantly improves Gleason grading of prostate biopsies by pathologists.
Bulten W; Balkenhol M; Belinga JA; Brilhante A; Çakır A; Egevad L; Eklund M; Farré X; Geronatsiou K; Molinié V; Pereira G; Roy P; Saile G; Salles P; Schaafsma E; Tschui J; Vos AM; ; van Boven H; Vink R; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van der Kaa C; Litjens G
Mod Pathol; 2021 Mar; 34(3):660-671. PubMed ID: 32759979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inter/intra-observer reproducibility of Gleason scoring in prostate adenocarcinoma in Iranian pathologists.
Abdollahi A; Meysamie A; Sheikhbahaei S; Ahmadi A; Moradi-Tabriz H; Bakhshandeh M; Hosseinzadeh H
Urol J; 2012; 9(2):486-90. PubMed ID: 22641492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images.
Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. WeGleNet: A weakly-supervised convolutional neural network for the semantic segmentation of Gleason grades in prostate histology images.
Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Naranjo V
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2021 Mar; 88():101846. PubMed ID: 33485056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inter-observer variability of cribriform architecture and percent Gleason pattern 4 in prostate cancer: relation to clinical outcome.
van der Slot MA; Hollemans E; den Bakker MA; Hoedemaeker R; Kliffen M; Budel LM; Goemaere NNT; van Leenders GJLH
Virchows Arch; 2021 Feb; 478(2):249-256. PubMed ID: 32815034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic grading of prostate cancer in digitized histopathology images: Learning from multiple experts.
Nir G; Hor S; Karimi D; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Wilson RS; Iczkowski KA; Lucia MS; Black PC; Abolmaesumi P; Goldenberg SL; Salcudean SE
Med Image Anal; 2018 Dec; 50():167-180. PubMed ID: 30340027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter-observer reproducibility before and after web-based education in the Gleason grading of the prostate adenocarcinoma among the Iranian pathologists.
Abdollahi A; Sheikhbahaei S; Meysamie A; Bakhshandeh M; Hosseinzadeh H
Acta Med Iran; 2014; 52(5):370-4. PubMed ID: 24902017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combining weakly and strongly supervised learning improves strong supervision in Gleason pattern classification.
Otálora S; Marini N; Müller H; Atzori M
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 May; 21(1):77. PubMed ID: 33964886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning.
Arvaniti E; Fricker KS; Moret M; Rupp N; Hermanns T; Fankhauser C; Wey N; Wild PJ; Rüschoff JH; Claassen M
Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12054. PubMed ID: 30104757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
