These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37076266)

  • 1. Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment.
    Nussbaumer-Streit B; Sommer I; Hamel C; Devane D; Noel-Storr A; Puljak L; Trivella M; Gartlehner G;
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2023 Nov; 28(6):418-423. PubMed ID: 37076266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies.
    Haby MM; Barreto JOM; Kim JYH; Peiris S; Mansilla C; Torres M; Guerrero-Magaña DE; Reveiz L
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jan; 15(1):2-20. PubMed ID: 37696668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the interim Cochrane rapid review methods guidance-A mixed-methods study on the understanding of and adherence to the guidance.
    Griebler U; Dobrescu A; Ledinger D; Klingenstein P; Sommer I; Emprechtinger R; Persad E; Gadinger A; Trivella M; Klerings I; Nussbaumer-Streit B
    Res Synth Methods; 2023 Nov; 14(6):824-846. PubMed ID: 37483013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on assessing the certainty of evidence.
    Gartlehner G; Nussbaumer-Streit B; Devane D; Kahwati L; Viswanathan M; King VJ; Qaseem A; Akl E; Schuenemann HJ;
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2024 Jan; 29(1):50-54. PubMed ID: 37076264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid review methods series: Guidance on the use of supportive software.
    Affengruber L; Nussbaumer-Streit B; Hamel C; Van der Maten M; Thomas J; Mavergames C; Spijker R; Gartlehner G;
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2024 Jul; 29(4):264-271. PubMed ID: 38242566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used inadequately in the majority of non-Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Puljak L; Ramic I; Arriola Naharro C; Brezova J; Lin YC; Surdila AA; Tomajkova E; Farias Medeiros I; Nikolovska M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Barcot O; Suarez Salvado M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 123():114-119. PubMed ID: 32247026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews.
    Swierz MJ; Storman D; Zajac J; Koperny M; Weglarz P; Staskiewicz W; Gorecka M; Skuza A; Wach A; Kaluzinska K; Bochenek-Cibor J; Johnston BC; Bala MM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):261. PubMed ID: 34837960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High and unclear risk of bias assessments are predominant in diagnostic accuracy studies included in Cochrane reviews.
    Di Girolamo N; Winter A; Meursinge Reynders R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 101():73-78. PubMed ID: 29777798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews.
    King VJ; Stevens A; Nussbaumer-Streit B; Kamel C; Garritty C
    Syst Rev; 2022 Jul; 11(1):151. PubMed ID: 35906677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study.
    Barcot O; Boric M; Dosenovic S; Cavar M; Jelicic Kadic A; Poklepovic Pericic T; Vukicevic I; Vuka I; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):240. PubMed ID: 32993499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk of bias assessment of sequence generation: a study of 100 systematic reviews of trials.
    Wuytack F; Regan M; Biesty L; Meskell P; Lutomski JE; O'Donnell M; Treweek S; Devane D
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):13. PubMed ID: 30621793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS.
    Hooper EJ; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and Efficiency of Machine Learning-Assisted Risk-of-Bias Assessments in "Real-World" Systematic Reviews : A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Arno A; Thomas J; Wallace B; Marshall IJ; McKenzie JE; Elliott JH
    Ann Intern Med; 2022 Jul; 175(7):1001-1009. PubMed ID: 35635850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk of bias assessments for selective reporting were inadequate in the majority of Cochrane reviews.
    Saric F; Barcot O; Puljak L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Aug; 112():53-58. PubMed ID: 31009658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook.
    Barcot O; Boric M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Cavar M; Dosenovic S; Vuka I; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):170. PubMed ID: 31382898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals.
    Marušić MF; Fidahić M; Cepeha CM; Farcaș LG; Tseke A; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):121. PubMed ID: 32423382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new method for testing reproducibility in systematic reviews was developed, but needs more testing.
    Pieper D; Heß S; Faggion CM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jul; 21(1):157. PubMed ID: 34325650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.