128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37076340)
1. Feasibility and limitations of head MRI in patients with cochlear implants.
Yokota S; Yoshimura H; Shirai K; Kanaya K; Adachi Y; Fujinaga Y; Takumi Y
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2023 Dec; 50(6):874-879. PubMed ID: 37076340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterizing Cochlear Implant Magnet-Related MRI Artifact.
Cass ND; Totten DJ; Ross JD; O'Malley MR
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2023 Mar; 132(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 35382589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Systematic Review of Cochlear Implant-Related Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifact: Implications for Clinical Imaging.
Berry JM; Tansey JB; Wu L; Choudhri A; Yawn RJ; MacDonald CB; Richard C
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):204-214. PubMed ID: 38260952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. First MRI With New Cochlear Implant With Rotatable Internal Magnet System and Proposal for Standardization of Reporting Magnet-Related Artifact Size.
Cass ND; Honce JM; O'Dell AL; Gubbels SP
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Aug; 40(7):883-891. PubMed ID: 31219967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dimensions and forms of artefacts in 1.5 T and 3 T MRI caused by cochlear implants.
Gottfried TM; Dejaco D; Fischer N; Innerhofer V; Chacko LJ; Widmann G; Kremser C; Riechelmann H; Schmutzhard J
Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):4884. PubMed ID: 35318407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Head Position and Magnetic Resonance Sequence on Cochlear Implant-Related Artifact Size and Internal Auditory Canal Visibility.
Kalmanson OA; Talmage GD; Honce JM; Gubbels SP
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Feb; 44(2):e73-e80. PubMed ID: 36624593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cranial MRI in a young child with cochlear implants after bilateral magnet removal.
Helbig S; Stöver T; Burck I; Kramer S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():1-4. PubMed ID: 29224745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implants.
Wackym PA; Michel MA; Prost RW; Banks KL; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB
Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1355-61. PubMed ID: 15280707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifact Associated With Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implants: Cholesteatoma and Vestibular Schwannoma Surveillance.
Nassiri AM; Messina SA; Benson JC; Lane JI; McGee KP; Trzasko JD; Carlson ML
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Jan; 170(1):187-194. PubMed ID: 37582349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI without magnet removal in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients with cochlear and auditory brainstem implants.
Walton J; Donnelly NP; Tam YC; Joubert I; Durie-Gair J; Jackson C; Mannion RA; Tysome JR; Axon PR; Scoffings DJ
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jun; 35(5):821-5. PubMed ID: 24608375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective study on magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant patients.
Helbig S; Thiemann N; Hattingen E; Loth A; Stöver T; Leinung M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Mar; 281(3):1231-1242. PubMed ID: 37707616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Cochlear Implant Magnets and Their MRI Artifact Size.
Todt I; Guerkov R; Gehl HB; Sudhoff H
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():5086291. PubMed ID: 32420348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of MRI in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with and without retained magnet.
Walker B; Norton S; Phillips G; Christianson E; Horn D; Ou H
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jun; 109():44-49. PubMed ID: 29728183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The experience of auditory implant recipients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: Factors associated with pain.
Smith ME; Moualed DJ; Freeman SR; Stapleton EJ; Anup R; Kurian J; Jarvis N; Thomas OM; Lloyd SKW
Cochlear Implants Int; 2023 Sep; 24(5):260-267. PubMed ID: 36938810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cochlear Implants and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Experience With Over 100 Studies Performed With Magnets in Place.
Fussell WL; Patel NS; Carlson ML; Neff BA; Watson RE; Lane JI; Driscoll CLW
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Jan; 42(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 33044338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cochlear implants and 1.5 T MRI scans: the effect of diametrically bipolar magnets and screw fixation on pain.
Todt I; Rademacher G; Grupe G; Stratmann A; Ernst A; Mutze S; Mittmann P
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Feb; 47(1):11. PubMed ID: 29402322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adverse events and discomfort during magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant recipients.
Kim BG; Kim JW; Park JJ; Kim SH; Kim HN; Choi JY
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Jan; 141(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 25411817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifacts and Cochlear Implant Positioning at 1.5 T In Vivo.
Schröder D; Grupe G; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Ernst A; Seidl R; Mittmann P
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():9163285. PubMed ID: 30533442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cochlear implants and magnetic resonance scans: A case report and review.
Broomfield SJ; Da Cruz M; Gibson WP
Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jan; 14(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 22449316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MRI Metal Artifact Reduction Sequence for Auditory Implants: First Results with a Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant.
Wimmer W; Hakim A; Kiefer C; Pastore-Wapp M; Anschuetz L; Caversaccio MD; Wagner F
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(2):56-64. PubMed ID: 31067530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
