These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37076456)

  • 1. Calibration of cognitive tests to address the reliability paradox for decision-conflict tasks.
    Kucina T; Wells L; Lewis I; de Salas K; Kohl A; Palmer MA; Sauer JD; Matzke D; Aidman E; Heathcote A
    Nat Commun; 2023 Apr; 14(1):2234. PubMed ID: 37076456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks.
    Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; König J; Hofbauer K; Mackenzie IG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):949-959. PubMed ID: 36316615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and Convergence of Conflict Effects.
    Whitehead PS; Brewer GA; Blais C
    Exp Psychol; 2020 Sep; 67(5):303-313. PubMed ID: 33274657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. List-level control in the flanker task.
    Bugg JM; Gonthier C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Sep; 73(9):1444-1459. PubMed ID: 32103700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interference scores have inadequate concurrent and convergent validity: Should we stop using the flanker, Simon, and spatial Stroop tasks?
    Paap KR; Anders-Jefferson R; Zimiga B; Mason L; Mikulinsky R
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Feb; 5(1):7. PubMed ID: 32056032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Overshooting cognitive control adjustments in older age: Evidence from conflict- and error-related slowing in the Stroop, Simon, and flanker tasks.
    Dubravac M; Meier B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Apr; 234():103874. PubMed ID: 36857883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information in congruency sequence effects: Applying the diffusion model for conflict tasks.
    Koob V; Mackenzie I; Ulrich R; Leuthold H; Janczyk M
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Feb; 140():101528. PubMed ID: 36584549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions.
    Strauss GP; Allen DN; Jorgensen ML; Cramer SL
    Assessment; 2005 Sep; 12(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 16123253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A behavioural and electrophysiological investigation of the effect of bilingualism on aging and cognitive control.
    Kousaie S; Phillips NA
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():23-35. PubMed ID: 27876508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences.
    Hedge C; Powell G; Sumner P
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Jun; 50(3):1166-1186. PubMed ID: 28726177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Generality and specificity in cognitive control: conflict adaptation within and across selective-attention tasks but not across selective-attention and Simon tasks.
    Freitas AL; Clark SL
    Psychol Res; 2015 Jan; 79(1):143-62. PubMed ID: 24487727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in conflict-monitoring: testing means and covariance hypothesis about the Simon and the Eriksen Flanker task.
    Keye D; Wilhelm O; Oberauer K; van Ravenzwaaij D
    Psychol Res; 2009 Nov; 73(6):762-76. PubMed ID: 19034502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Registered Replication Report of Weissman, D. H., Jiang, J., & Egner, T. (2014). Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds.
    Gyurkovics M; Kovacs M; Jaquiery M; Palfi B; Dechterenko F; Aczel B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3777-3787. PubMed ID: 32935289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making a saccade enhances Stroop and Simon conflict control.
    Luo X; Gu J; Zheng Y; Zhou X
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):795-814. PubMed ID: 35304699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Internal reliability of measures of substance-related cognitive bias.
    Ataya AF; Adams S; Mullings E; Cooper RM; Attwood AS; Munafò MR
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2012 Feb; 121(1-2):148-51. PubMed ID: 21955365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The two sides of temporal orienting: facilitating perceptual selection, disrupting response selection.
    Correa A; Cappucci P; Nobre AC; Lupiáñez J
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 20178944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining a supramodal network for conflict processing: a systematic review and novel functional magnetic resonance imaging data for related visual and auditory stroop tasks.
    Roberts KL; Hall DA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 20(6):1063-78. PubMed ID: 18211237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conflict control of emotional and non-emotional conflicts in preadolescent children.
    Liu T; Liu X; Li D; Shangguan F; Lu L; Shi J
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Sep; 146():107708. PubMed ID: 31153934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repeated computerized cognitive testing: Performance shifts and test-retest reliability in healthy older adults.
    White N; Flannery L; McClintock A; Machado L
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2019 Mar; 41(2):179-191. PubMed ID: 30320531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of conflict trial proportion: A comparison of the Eriksen and Simon tasks.
    Bausenhart KM; Ulrich R; Miller J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):810-836. PubMed ID: 33269440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.