These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3707739)

  • 1. The comparison of facial grading systems.
    Burres S; Fisch U
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1986 Jul; 112(7):755-8. PubMed ID: 3707739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Grading facial nerve function: House-Brackmann versus Burres-Fisch methods.
    Croxson G; May M; Mester SJ
    Am J Otol; 1990 Jul; 11(4):240-6. PubMed ID: 2399941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective assessment of the reliability of the House-Brackmann and Fisch grading of synkinesis.
    Meier-Gallati V; Scriba H
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 274(12):4217-4223. PubMed ID: 29032419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid simultaneous comparison system for subjective grading scales grading scales for facial paralysis.
    Ahrens A; Skarada D; Wallace M; Cheung JY; Neely JG
    Am J Otol; 1999 Sep; 20(5):667-71. PubMed ID: 10503592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative value of facial nerve grading systems.
    Rickenmann J; Jaquenod C; Cerenko D; Fisch U
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Oct; 117(4):322-5. PubMed ID: 9339790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective method for facial motricity grading in healthy individuals and in patients with unilateral peripheral facial palsy.
    Mitre EI; Lazarini PR; Dolci JE
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2008; 29(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 18061833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Good correlation between original and modified House Brackmann facial grading systems.
    Henstrom DK; Skilbeck CJ; Weinberg J; Knox C; Cheney ML; Hadlock TA
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Jan; 121(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 21120826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Grading facial nerve function: why a new grading system, the MoReSS, should be proposed.
    de Ru JA; Braunius WW; van Benthem PP; Busschers WB; Hordijk GJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):1030-6. PubMed ID: 17006355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facial nerve grading instruments: systematic review of the literature and suggestion for uniformity.
    Fattah AY; Gurusinghe ADR; Gavilan J; Hadlock TA; Marcus JR; Marres H; Nduka CC; Slattery WH; Snyder-Warwick AK;
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Feb; 135(2):569-579. PubMed ID: 25357164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of facial nerve grading systems.
    Lee LN; Susarla SM; H Hohman M; Henstrom DK; Cheney ML; Hadlock TA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Mar; 70(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 23241802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of the "Sydney," "Sunnybrook," and "House Brackmann" facial grading systems to assess voluntary movement and synkinesis after facial nerve paralysis.
    Coulson SE; Croxson GR; Adams RD; O'Dwyer NJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Apr; 132(4):543-9. PubMed ID: 15806042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Measuring facial paralysis using the three-dimensional dynamic quantitative analysis system of facial motion: correlation with subjective grading systems].
    Zhao Y; Feng GD; Wu HY; Zhuang Y; Gao ZQ
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 51(7):511-6. PubMed ID: 27480299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An analysis of the Adour-Swanson and House-Brackmann grading systems for facial nerve recovery.
    Lewis BI; Adour KK
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1995; 252(5):265-9. PubMed ID: 7576582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Graphic-visual adaptation of House-Brackmann facial nerve grading for peripheral facial palsy.
    Lazarini P; Mitre E; Takatu E; Tidei R
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 31(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 16759238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial weakness. A comparison of clinical and photographic methods of observation.
    Smith IM; Murray JA; Cull RE; Slattery J
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1991 Aug; 117(8):906-9. PubMed ID: 1892624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A step backward: the 'Rough' facial nerve grading system.
    Alicandri-Ciufelli M; Piccinini A; Grammatica A; Salafia F; Ciancimino C; Cunsolo E; Pingani L; Rigatelli M; Genovese E; Monzani D; Gioacchini FM; Marchioni D; Presutti L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):e175-9. PubMed ID: 23321051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical assessment of a new computerised objective method of measuring facial palsy.
    Kecskés G; Jóri J; O'Reilly BF; Viharos L; Rovó L
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2011 Aug; 36(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 21554560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated objective and marker-free facial grading using photographs of patients with facial palsy.
    Mothes O; Modersohn L; Volk GF; Klingner C; Witte OW; Schlattmann P; Denzler J; Guntinas-Lichius O
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Dec; 276(12):3335-3343. PubMed ID: 31535292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Video Instruction for Synchronous Video Recording of Mimic Movement of Patients with Facial Palsy].
    Schaede RA; Volk GF; Modersohn L; Barth JM; Denzler J; Guntinas-Lichius O
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2017 Dec; 96(12):844-849. PubMed ID: 28470660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Nottingham System: objective assessment of facial nerve function in the clinic.
    Murty GE; Diver JP; Kelly PJ; O'Donoghue GM; Bradley PJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Feb; 110(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 8108150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.