These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3707739)
1. The comparison of facial grading systems. Burres S; Fisch U Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1986 Jul; 112(7):755-8. PubMed ID: 3707739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Grading facial nerve function: House-Brackmann versus Burres-Fisch methods. Croxson G; May M; Mester SJ Am J Otol; 1990 Jul; 11(4):240-6. PubMed ID: 2399941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Objective assessment of the reliability of the House-Brackmann and Fisch grading of synkinesis. Meier-Gallati V; Scriba H Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 274(12):4217-4223. PubMed ID: 29032419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid simultaneous comparison system for subjective grading scales grading scales for facial paralysis. Ahrens A; Skarada D; Wallace M; Cheung JY; Neely JG Am J Otol; 1999 Sep; 20(5):667-71. PubMed ID: 10503592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative value of facial nerve grading systems. Rickenmann J; Jaquenod C; Cerenko D; Fisch U Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Oct; 117(4):322-5. PubMed ID: 9339790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objective method for facial motricity grading in healthy individuals and in patients with unilateral peripheral facial palsy. Mitre EI; Lazarini PR; Dolci JE Am J Otolaryngol; 2008; 29(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 18061833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Good correlation between original and modified House Brackmann facial grading systems. Henstrom DK; Skilbeck CJ; Weinberg J; Knox C; Cheney ML; Hadlock TA Laryngoscope; 2011 Jan; 121(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 21120826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Grading facial nerve function: why a new grading system, the MoReSS, should be proposed. de Ru JA; Braunius WW; van Benthem PP; Busschers WB; Hordijk GJ Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):1030-6. PubMed ID: 17006355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Facial nerve grading instruments: systematic review of the literature and suggestion for uniformity. Fattah AY; Gurusinghe ADR; Gavilan J; Hadlock TA; Marcus JR; Marres H; Nduka CC; Slattery WH; Snyder-Warwick AK; Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Feb; 135(2):569-579. PubMed ID: 25357164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of facial nerve grading systems. Lee LN; Susarla SM; H Hohman M; Henstrom DK; Cheney ML; Hadlock TA Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Mar; 70(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 23241802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of the "Sydney," "Sunnybrook," and "House Brackmann" facial grading systems to assess voluntary movement and synkinesis after facial nerve paralysis. Coulson SE; Croxson GR; Adams RD; O'Dwyer NJ Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Apr; 132(4):543-9. PubMed ID: 15806042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Measuring facial paralysis using the three-dimensional dynamic quantitative analysis system of facial motion: correlation with subjective grading systems]. Zhao Y; Feng GD; Wu HY; Zhuang Y; Gao ZQ Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 51(7):511-6. PubMed ID: 27480299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An analysis of the Adour-Swanson and House-Brackmann grading systems for facial nerve recovery. Lewis BI; Adour KK Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1995; 252(5):265-9. PubMed ID: 7576582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]