BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37077840)

  • 1. The Use of Biomarkers in Pharmacovigilance: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
    Salas M; Gossell-Williams M; Yalamanchili P; Dhingra S; Malikova MA; Aimer O; Junaid T
    Biomark Insights; 2023; 18():11772719231164528. PubMed ID: 37077840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacovigilance: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
    Salas M; Petracek J; Yalamanchili P; Aimer O; Kasthuril D; Dhingra S; Junaid T; Bostic T
    Pharmaceut Med; 2022 Oct; 36(5):295-306. PubMed ID: 35904529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys.
    Avery AJ; Anderson C; Bond CM; Fortnum H; Gifford A; Hannaford PC; Hazell L; Krska J; Lee AJ; McLernon DJ; Murphy E; Shakir S; Watson MC
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 May; 15(20):1-234, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 21545758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Signals of adverse drug reactions communicated by pharmacovigilance stakeholders: protocol for a scoping review of the global literature.
    Sartori D; Aronson JK; Onakpoya IJ
    Syst Rev; 2020 Aug; 9(1):180. PubMed ID: 32791982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bibliometric analysis of adverse drug reactions and pharmacovigilance research activities in Nepal.
    Shrestha S; Danekhu K; Kc B; Palaian S; Ibrahim MIM
    Ther Adv Drug Saf; 2020; 11():2042098620922480. PubMed ID: 32587678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient versus healthcare professional spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting: a systematic review.
    Inch J; Watson MC; Anakwe-Umeh S
    Drug Saf; 2012 Oct; 35(10):807-18. PubMed ID: 22928729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Knowledge, attitude, practice and barriers towards pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reactions reporting among healthcare professionals in Turkey: a systematic review.
    Khan Z; Karatas Y; Martins MAP; Jamshed S; Rahman H
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2022 Jan; 38(1):145-154. PubMed ID: 34694167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pharmacovigilance in oncology: evaluation of current practice and future perspectives.
    Baldo P; De Paoli P
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Oct; 20(5):559-69. PubMed ID: 24909067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utilizing social media data for pharmacovigilance: A review.
    Sarker A; Ginn R; Nikfarjam A; O'Connor K; Smith K; Jayaraman S; Upadhaya T; Gonzalez G
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Apr; 54():202-12. PubMed ID: 25720841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety Concerns Reported by Patients Identified in a Collaborative Signal Detection Workshop using VigiBase: Results and Reflections from Lareb and Uppsala Monitoring Centre.
    Watson S; Chandler RE; Taavola H; Härmark L; Grundmark B; Zekarias A; Star K; van Hunsel F
    Drug Saf; 2018 Feb; 41(2):203-212. PubMed ID: 28933055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic review of paediatric studies of adverse drug reactions from pharmacovigilance databases.
    Cliff-Eribo KO; Sammons H; Choonara I
    Expert Opin Drug Saf; 2016 Oct; 15(10):1321-8. PubMed ID: 27501085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. IL-4/13 Blockade and sleep-related adverse drug reactions in over 37,000 Dupilumab reports from the World Health Organization Individual Case Safety reporting pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase™): a big data and machine learning analysis.
    Alroobaea R; Rubaiee S; Hanbazazah AS; Jahrami H; Garbarino S; Damiani G; Wu J; Bragazzi NL
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Jun; 26(11):4074-4081. PubMed ID: 35731078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Healthcare professionals and pharmacovigilance of pediatric adverse drug reactions: a 5-year analysis of Adverse Events Reporting System Database of the Food and Drug Administration.
    Bigi C; Tuccori M; Bocci G
    Minerva Pediatr (Torino); 2022 Jun; 74(3):272-280. PubMed ID: 28211644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of completeness of suspected adverse drug reaction reports submitted to the mexican national pharmacovigilance centre: a cross-sectional period-prevalence study.
    Sánchez-Sánchez B; Altagracia-Martínez M; Kravzov-Jinich J; Moreno-Bonett C; Vázquez-Moreno E; Martínez-Núñez JM
    Drug Saf; 2012 Oct; 35(10):837-44. PubMed ID: 22924896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pharmacovigilance of herbal medicines: Concerns and future prospects.
    Choudhury A; Singh PA; Bajwa N; Dash S; Bisht P
    J Ethnopharmacol; 2023 Jun; 309():116383. PubMed ID: 36918049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FarmaREL: An Italian pharmacovigilance project to monitor and evaluate adverse drug reactions in haematologic patients.
    Fracchiolla NS; Artuso S; Cortelezzi A; Pelizzari AM; Tozzi P; Bonfichi M; Bocchio F; Gargantini L; De Rosa E; Vighi GD; Prestini L; Sammassimo S; Frungillo N; Pasquini MC; Ragazzi A; Boghi D; Pastore A; Lanzi E; Gritti G; Quaresmini G; Voltolini S; Gaiardoni R; Corti C; Vilardo MC; La Targia ML; Berini G; Magagnoli M; Bacci C; Consonni D; Rivolta AL; Muti G
    Hematol Oncol; 2018 Feb; 36(1):299-306. PubMed ID: 28771763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complementing the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System With Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting From Social Media: Comparative Analysis.
    Zhou Z; Hultgren KE
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2020 Sep; 6(3):e19266. PubMed ID: 32996889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying the Severity of Adverse Drug Reactions Using Social Media: Network Analysis.
    Lavertu A; Hamamsy T; Altman RB
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Oct; 23(10):e27714. PubMed ID: 34673524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.