BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37078628)

  • 1. PSA density does not improve predictive accuracy of the UCSF-CAPRA score.
    Parker R; Bell A; Chang K; Greenberg S; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
    Prostate; 2023 Jul; 83(10):922-928. PubMed ID: 37078628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Cooperberg MR; Pasta DJ; Elkin EP; Litwin MS; Latini DM; Du Chane J; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):1938-42. PubMed ID: 15879786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of MRI-Based Staging and Pathologic Staging for Predicting Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Merriman KM; Harmon SA; Belue MJ; Yilmaz EC; Blake Z; Lay NS; Phelps TE; Merino MJ; Parnes HL; Law YM; Gurram S; Wood BJ; Choyke PL; Pinto PA; Turkbey B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Dec; 221(6):773-787. PubMed ID: 37404084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy by cancer of the prostate risk assessment post-surgical (CAPRA-S) score.
    Aktas BK; Ozden C; Bulut S; Tagci S; Erbay G; Gokkaya CS; Baykam MM; Memis A
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(6):2527-30. PubMed ID: 25824791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictors of biochemical recurrence in pT3b prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Pagano MJ; Whalen MJ; Paulucci DJ; Reddy BN; Matulay JT; Rothberg M; Scarberry K; Patel T; Shapiro EY; RoyChoudhury A; McKiernan J; Benson MC; Badani KK
    Prostate; 2016 Feb; 76(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 26481325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. External validation of the UCSF-CAPRA (University of California, San Francisco, Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment) in Japanese patients receiving radical prostatectomy.
    Ishizaki F; Hoque MA; Nishiyama T; Kawasaki T; Kasahara T; Hara N; Takizawa I; Saito T; Kitamura Y; Akazawa K; Takahashi K
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2011 Nov; 41(11):1259-64. PubMed ID: 21940731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting recurrence after radical prostatectomy for patients with high risk prostate cancer.
    Grossfeld GD; Latini DM; Lubeck DP; Mehta SS; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2003 Jan; 169(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 12478126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined value of validated clinical and genomic risk stratification tools for predicting prostate cancer mortality in a high-risk prostatectomy cohort.
    Cooperberg MR; Davicioni E; Crisan A; Jenkins RB; Ghadessi M; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):326-33. PubMed ID: 24998118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the Optimal Timing for Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Rise After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Fossati N; Karnes RJ; Cozzarini C; Fiorino C; Gandaglia G; Joniau S; Boorjian SA; Goldner G; Hinkelbein W; Haustermans K; Tombal B; Shariat S; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Wiegel T; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):728-733. PubMed ID: 26497924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. External validation of University of California, San Francisco, Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score.
    Zhao KH; Hernandez DJ; Han M; Humphreys EB; Mangold LA; Partin AW
    Urology; 2008 Aug; 72(2):396-400. PubMed ID: 18372031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity of the CAPRA score to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Results from a european multicenter survey of 1,296 patients.
    May M; Knoll N; Siegsmund M; Fahlenkamp D; Vogler H; Hoschke B; Gralla O
    J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1957-62; discussion 1962. PubMed ID: 17868719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy.
    Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Marra G; Moschini M; Martini A; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Afferi L; Rakauskas A; Gontero P; Mattei A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 3(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 32847747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiinstitutional validation of the UCSF cancer of the prostate risk assessment for prediction of recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ; Pasta DJ; Elkin EP; Presti JC; Amling CL; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Carroll PR
    Cancer; 2006 Nov; 107(10):2384-91. PubMed ID: 17039503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preoperative predictive factors and further risk stratification of biochemical recurrence in clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer.
    Hamada R; Nakashima J; Ohori M; Ohno Y; Komori O; Yoshioka K; Tachibana M
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 21(3):595-600. PubMed ID: 26585896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of Oncological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy According to Preoperative and Postoperative Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Scores: Results from a Large, Two-center Experience.
    Leyh-Bannurah SR; Dell'Oglio P; Zaffuto E; Briganti A; Schiffmann J; Pompe RS; Tilki D; Heinzer H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Budäus L
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Jul; 5(4):568-576. PubMed ID: 29129756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel serum biomarker quintet reveals added prognostic value when combined with standard clinical parameters in prostate cancer patients by predicting biochemical recurrence and adverse pathology.
    Athanasiou A; Tennstedt P; Wittig A; Huber R; Straub O; Schiess R; Steuber T
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259093. PubMed ID: 34767586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Percentage of positive biopsy cores, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, pT and Gleason score as predictors of PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional outcome study in Japan.
    Yokomizo A; Murai M; Baba S; Ogawa O; Tsukamoto T; Niwakawa M; Tobisu K; Kinukawa N; Naito S
    BJU Int; 2006 Sep; 98(3):549-53. PubMed ID: 16925752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative model for predicting prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy using percent of biopsy tissue with cancer, biopsy Gleason grade and serum prostate specific antigen.
    Freedland SJ; Terris MK; Csathy GS; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Presti JC; Dorey F; Aronson WJ;
    J Urol; 2004 Jun; 171(6 Pt 1):2215-20. PubMed ID: 15126788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of a novel method for the measurement of prostate-specific antigen, AccuPSA(TM) , as a predictor of 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy: results of a pilot study.
    Lepor H; Cheli CD; Thiel RP; Taneja SS; Laze J; Chan DW; Sokoll LJ; Mangold L; Partin AW
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1770-5. PubMed ID: 21992499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.