BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37079087)

  • 1. Evaluation of adjustment behaviour in a semi-supervised self-adjustment fine-tuning procedure for hearing aids.
    Gößwein JA; Rennies J; Winneke A; Hildebrandt A; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2024 May; 63(5):313-325. PubMed ID: 37079087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and psychometric properties of the sound preference and hearing habits questionnaire (SP-HHQ).
    Meis M; Huber R; Fischer RL; Schulte M; Spilski J; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S118-S129. PubMed ID: 27875658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a semi-supervised self-adjustment fine-tuning procedure for hearing aids.
    Gößwein JA; Rennies J; Huber R; Bruns T; Hildebrandt A; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Feb; 62(2):159-171. PubMed ID: 35076330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hearing aid technology: model-based concepts and assessment.
    Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S1-S2. PubMed ID: 29338464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing aid technology: model-based concepts and assessment.
    Johnson EE
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S29-S30. PubMed ID: 28635502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving uptake and outcomes of hearing aid fitting for older adults: what are the barriers and facilitators?
    Hickson L; Meyer C
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S1-2. PubMed ID: 24528289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of bandwidth, compression speed, and gain at high frequencies on preferences for amplified music.
    Moore BC
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):159-72. PubMed ID: 23172008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of a self-fitting hearing aid among urban-dwelling hearing-impaired adults in a developed country.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Hartley L
    Trends Amplif; 2011 Dec; 15(4):175-83. PubMed ID: 22079900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying the barriers and facilitators to optimal hearing aid self-efficacy.
    Meyer C; Hickson L; Fletcher A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S28-37. PubMed ID: 24447235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modifications of the MUlti stimulus test with Hidden Reference and Anchor (MUSHRA) for use in audiology.
    Völker C; Bisitz T; Huber R; Kollmeier B; Ernst SMA
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S92-S104. PubMed ID: 27598985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experiences of an Internet-based aural rehabilitation (IAR) program for hearing aid users: a qualitative study.
    Malmberg M; Sundewall Thorén E; Öberg M; Lunner T; Andersson G; Kähäri K
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Aug; 57(8):570-576. PubMed ID: 29688096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors associated with success with hearing aids in older adults.
    Hickson L; Meyer C; Lovelock K; Lampert M; Khan A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S18-27. PubMed ID: 24447233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using the device-oriented subjective outcome (DOSO) scale to measure outcomes of different hearing aids.
    Xu J; Galster J; Galster E; Gruhlke A; Wolfe A
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Aug; 57(8):584-591. PubMed ID: 29621924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Australian version of the acceptable noise level test and its predictive value for successful hearing aid use in an older population.
    Walravens E; Keidser G; Hartley D; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S52-9. PubMed ID: 24447234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing aid user guides: suitability for older adults.
    Caposecco A; Hickson L; Meyer C
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S43-51. PubMed ID: 24447232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring the relationship between technology use, hearing help-seeking, and hearing aid outcomes in older adults.
    Stieglitz Ham H; Bunn P; Meyer C; Khan A; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S38-42. PubMed ID: 24400825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hearing aid fitting and fine-tuning based on estimated individual traits.
    Völker C; Ernst SMA; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 27873543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a multimedia educational programme for first-time hearing aid users: a participatory design.
    Ferguson M; Leighton P; Brandreth M; Wharrad H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Aug; 57(8):600-609. PubMed ID: 29718733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
    Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.