These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37079818)

  • 1. On the accuracy, media representation, and public perception of psychological scientists' judgments of societal change.
    Hutcherson CA; Sharpinskyi K; Varnum MEW; Rotella A; Wormley AS; Tay L; Grossmann I
    Am Psychol; 2023 Nov; 78(8):968-981. PubMed ID: 37079818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Insights into the accuracy of social scientists' forecasts of societal change.
    Forecasting Collaborative
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 7(4):484-501. PubMed ID: 36759585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How heuristic credibility cues affect credibility judgments and decisions.
    Gugerty L; Link DM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Dec; 26(4):620-645. PubMed ID: 32658526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expert predictions of societal change: Insights from the world after COVID project.
    Grossmann I; Twardus O; Varnum MEW; Jayawickreme E; McLevey J
    Am Psychol; 2022; 77(2):276-290. PubMed ID: 34807633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Bayesian sampler: Generic Bayesian inference causes incoherence in human probability judgments.
    Zhu JQ; Sanborn AN; Chater N
    Psychol Rev; 2020 Oct; 127(5):719-748. PubMed ID: 32191073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.
    Llorente C; Revuelta G; Carrió M; Porta M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224262. PubMed ID: 31721768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the influence of evaluation context on judgments of effort.
    Ashburner M; Risko EF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Aug; 48(8):790-811. PubMed ID: 35758975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Strengths and Weaknesses of Crowds to Address Global Problems.
    Broomell SB; Davis-Stober CP
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2024 Mar; 19(2):465-476. PubMed ID: 37428860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How experimental methods shaped views on human competence and rationality.
    Lejarraga T; Hertwig R
    Psychol Bull; 2021 Jun; 147(6):535-564. PubMed ID: 34843298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles.
    Kruglanski AW; Gigerenzer G
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 21244188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Judging social issues: difficulties, inconsistencies, and consistencies.
    Turiel E; Hildebrandt C; Wainryb C
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1991; 56(2):1-103. PubMed ID: 1766444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific networks on Twitter: Analyzing scientists' interactions in the climate change debate.
    Walter S; Lörcher I; Brüggemann M
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Aug; 28(6):696-712. PubMed ID: 31027461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An emerging form of public engagement with science: Ask Me Anything (AMA) sessions on Reddit r/science.
    Hara N; Abbazio J; Perkins K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216789. PubMed ID: 31091264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A counterfactual simulation model of causal judgments for physical events.
    Gerstenberg T; Goodman ND; Lagnado DA; Tenenbaum JB
    Psychol Rev; 2021 Oct; 128(5):936-975. PubMed ID: 34096754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does expertise and thinking mode matter for accuracy in judgments of job applicants' cognitive ability?
    Sinclair S; Agerström J
    Scand J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 61(4):484-493. PubMed ID: 32196682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Race-based biases in psychological distress and treatment judgments.
    Kunstman JW; Ogungbadero T; Deska JC; Bernstein MJ; Smith AR; Hugenberg K
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0293078. PubMed ID: 37856467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How the expertise heuristic accelerates decision-making and credibility judgments in social media by means of effort reduction.
    Meinert J; Krämer NC
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0264428. PubMed ID: 35294474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What is the impact of interleaving practice and delaying judgments on the accuracy of category-learning judgments?
    Foster NL; Mueller ML; Dunlosky J; Finkenthal L
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2023 Jun; 29(2):374-385. PubMed ID: 36006711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The similarity-updating model of probability judgment and belief revision.
    Albrecht R; Jenny MA; Nilsson H; Rieskamp J
    Psychol Rev; 2021 Nov; 128(6):1088-1111. PubMed ID: 34292023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.