These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37079832)

  • 1. Reward influences the allocation but not the availability of resources in visual working memory.
    Brissenden JA; Adkins TJ; Hsu YT; Lee TG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jul; 152(7):1825-1839. PubMed ID: 37079832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No evidence that the retro-cue benefit requires reallocation of memory resources.
    Lin YT; Fougnie D
    Cognition; 2022 Dec; 229():105230. PubMed ID: 36007468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The development of retro-cue benefits with extensive practice: Implications for capacity estimation and attentional states in visual working memory.
    Zerr P; Gayet S; van den Esschert F; Kappen M; Olah Z; Van der Stigchel S
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):1036-1049. PubMed ID: 33616865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limitations on flexible allocation of visual short-term memory resources with multiple levels of goal-directed attentional prioritization.
    Lockhart HA; Dube B; MacDonald KJ; Al-Aidroos N; Emrich SM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jan; 86(1):159-170. PubMed ID: 37985598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the robustness of feature-based selection in visual working memory.
    Arnicane A; Souza AS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 May; 47(5):731-758. PubMed ID: 34264730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A mechanistic insight into sources of error of visual working memory in multiple sclerosis.
    Motahharynia A; Pourmohammadi A; Adibi A; Shaygannejad V; Ashtari F; Adibi I; Sanayei M
    Elife; 2023 Nov; 12():. PubMed ID: 37937840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Swap errors in visual working memory are fully explained by cue-feature variability.
    McMaster JMV; Tomić I; Schneegans S; Bays PM
    Cogn Psychol; 2022 Sep; 137():101493. PubMed ID: 35777189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benefits of flexible prioritization in working memory can arise without costs.
    Myers NE; Chekroud SR; Stokes MG; Nobre AC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):398-411. PubMed ID: 28816476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural Architecture for Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory.
    Schneegans S; Bays PM
    J Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 37(14):3913-3925. PubMed ID: 28270569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prioritization sharpens working memories but does not protect them from distraction.
    Zhang Z; Lewis-Peacock JA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Apr; 152(4):1158-1174. PubMed ID: 36395057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. To be or not to be relevant: Comparing short- and long-term consequences across working memory prioritization procedures.
    Jeanneret S; Bartsch LM; Vergauwe E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jul; 85(5):1486-1498. PubMed ID: 37127814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No effect of monetary reward in a visual working memory task.
    van den Berg R; Zou Q; Li Y; Ma WJ
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280257. PubMed ID: 36649241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No age deficits in the ability to use attention to improve visual working memory.
    Souza AS
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Aug; 31(5):456-70. PubMed ID: 27253868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Directed avoidance and its effect on visual working memory.
    Williams RS; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Cognition; 2020 Aug; 201():104277. PubMed ID: 32276234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Neural Consequences of Attentional Prioritization of Internal Representations in Visual Working Memory.
    Sahan MI; Sheldon AD; Postle BR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 May; 32(5):917-944. PubMed ID: 31851592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.
    Gunseli E; van Moorselaar D; Meeter M; Olivers CN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1334-41. PubMed ID: 25563713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple high-reward items can be prioritized in working memory but with greater vulnerability to interference.
    Allen RJ; Ueno T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1731-1743. PubMed ID: 29968084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention restores discrete items to visual short-term memory.
    Murray AM; Nobre AC; Clark IA; Cravo AM; Stokes MG
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Apr; 24(4):550-6. PubMed ID: 23436786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of time in binding features in visual working memory.
    Schneegans S; McMaster JMV; Bays PM
    Psychol Rev; 2023 Jan; 130(1):137-154. PubMed ID: 35099211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.