219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37080984)
1. DeepFLR facilitates false localization rate control in phosphoproteomics.
Zong Y; Wang Y; Yang Y; Zhao D; Wang X; Shen C; Qiao L
Nat Commun; 2023 Apr; 14(1):2269. PubMed ID: 37080984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. LuciPHOr: algorithm for phosphorylation site localization with false localization rate estimation using modified target-decoy approach.
Fermin D; Walmsley SJ; Gingras AC; Choi H; Nesvizhskii AI
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Nov; 12(11):3409-19. PubMed ID: 23918812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deep Learning Prediction Boosts Phosphoproteomics-Based Discoveries Through Improved Phosphopeptide Identification.
Yi X; Wen B; Ji S; Saltzman AB; Jaehnig EJ; Lei JT; Gao Q; Zhang B
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2024 Feb; 23(2):100707. PubMed ID: 38154692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing Multiple Evidence Streams to Decide on Confidence for Identification of Post-Translational Modifications, within and Across Data Sets.
Camacho OM; Ramsbottom KA; Collins A; Jones AR
J Proteome Res; 2023 Jun; 22(6):1828-1842. PubMed ID: 37099386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of alternative MS/MS and bioinformatics approaches for confident phosphorylation site localization.
Wiese H; Kuhlmann K; Wiese S; Stoepel NS; Pawlas M; Meyer HE; Stephan C; Eisenacher M; Drepper F; Warscheid B
J Proteome Res; 2014 Feb; 13(2):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24364495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative Profiling of Protein Abundance and Phosphorylation State in Plant Tissues Using Tandem Mass Tags.
Song G; Montes C; Walley JW
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2139():147-156. PubMed ID: 32462584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Method for Independent Estimation of the False Localization Rate for Phosphoproteomics.
Ramsbottom KA; Prakash A; Riverol YP; Camacho OM; Martin MJ; Vizcaíno JA; Deutsch EW; Jones AR
J Proteome Res; 2022 Jul; 21(7):1603-1615. PubMed ID: 35640880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A data-independent acquisition-based global phosphoproteomics system enables deep profiling.
Kitata RB; Choong WK; Tsai CF; Lin PY; Chen BS; Chang YC; Nesvizhskii AI; Sung TY; Chen YJ
Nat Commun; 2021 May; 12(1):2539. PubMed ID: 33953186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rapid and reproducible phosphopeptide enrichment by tandem metal oxide affinity chromatography: application to boron deficiency induced phosphoproteomics.
Chen Y; Hoehenwarter W
Plant J; 2019 Apr; 98(2):370-384. PubMed ID: 30589143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Capillary Zone Electrophoresis-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Large-Scale Phosphoproteomics with the Production of over 11,000 Phosphopeptides from the Colon Carcinoma HCT116 Cell Line.
Chen D; Ludwig KR; Krokhin OV; Spicer V; Yang Z; Shen X; Hummon AB; Sun L
Anal Chem; 2019 Feb; 91(3):2201-2208. PubMed ID: 30624053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accurate phosphorylation site localization using phospho-brackets.
Xiao K; Shen Y; Li S; Tian Z
Anal Chim Acta; 2017 Dec; 996():38-47. PubMed ID: 29137706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PhoPepMass: A database and search tool assisting human phosphorylation peptide identification from mass spectrometry data.
Zhang M; Cui H; Chen L; Yu Y; Glocker MO; Xie L
J Genet Genomics; 2018 Jul; 45(7):381-388. PubMed ID: 30055873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Confident and sensitive phosphoproteomics using combinations of collision induced dissociation and electron transfer dissociation.
Collins MO; Wright JC; Jones M; Rayner JC; Choudhary JS
J Proteomics; 2014 May; 103(100):1-14. PubMed ID: 24657495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deep-Learning-Derived Evaluation Metrics Enable Effective Benchmarking of Computational Tools for Phosphopeptide Identification.
Jiang W; Wen B; Li K; Zeng WF; da Veiga Leprevost F; Moon J; Petyuk VA; Edwards NJ; Liu T; Nesvizhskii AI; Zhang B
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2021; 20():100171. PubMed ID: 34737085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fragment Mass Spectrum Prediction Facilitates Site Localization of Phosphorylation.
Yang Y; Horvatovich P; Qiao L
J Proteome Res; 2021 Jan; 20(1):634-644. PubMed ID: 32985198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiplexed quantitative phosphoproteomics of cell line and tissue samples.
Kreuzer J; Edwards A; Haas W
Methods Enzymol; 2019; 626():41-65. PubMed ID: 31606085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recent advances and challenges in plant phosphoproteomics.
Silva-Sanchez C; Li H; Chen S
Proteomics; 2015 Mar; 15(5-6):1127-41. PubMed ID: 25429768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A multi-purpose, regenerable, proteome-scale, human phosphoserine resource for phosphoproteomics.
Gassaway BM; Li J; Rad R; Mintseris J; Mohler K; Levy T; Aguiar M; Beausoleil SA; Paulo JA; Rinehart J; Huttlin EL; Gygi SP
Nat Methods; 2022 Nov; 19(11):1371-1375. PubMed ID: 36280721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benchmarking common quantification strategies for large-scale phosphoproteomics.
Hogrebe A; von Stechow L; Bekker-Jensen DB; Weinert BT; Kelstrup CD; Olsen JV
Nat Commun; 2018 Mar; 9(1):1045. PubMed ID: 29535314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Off-line high-pH reversed-phase fractionation for in-depth phosphoproteomics.
Batth TS; Francavilla C; Olsen JV
J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):6176-86. PubMed ID: 25338131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
