These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37081084)

  • 21. Integrating speech information across talkers, gender, and sensory modality: female faces and male voices in the McGurk effect.
    Green KP; Kuhl PK; Meltzoff AN; Stevens EB
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Dec; 50(6):524-36. PubMed ID: 1780200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification: a McGurk aftereffect.
    Bertelson P; Vroomen J; De Gelder B
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Nov; 14(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 14629691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relative Contribution of Auditory and Visual Information to Mandarin Chinese Tone Identification by Native and Tone-naïve Listeners.
    Han Y; Goudbeek M; Mos M; Swerts M
    Lang Speech; 2020 Dec; 63(4):856-876. PubMed ID: 31888403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multistage audiovisual integration of speech: dissociating identification and detection.
    Eskelund K; Tuomainen J; Andersen TS
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Feb; 208(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 21188364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Somatosensory contribution to audio-visual speech processing.
    Ito T; Ohashi H; Gracco VL
    Cortex; 2021 Oct; 143():195-204. PubMed ID: 34450567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. fMRI-Guided transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals that the superior temporal sulcus is a cortical locus of the McGurk effect.
    Beauchamp MS; Nath AR; Pasalar S
    J Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 30(7):2414-7. PubMed ID: 20164324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A causal inference explanation for enhancement of multisensory integration by co-articulation.
    Magnotti JF; Smith KB; Salinas M; Mays J; Zhu LL; Beauchamp MS
    Sci Rep; 2018 Dec; 8(1):18032. PubMed ID: 30575791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A value-driven McGurk effect: Value-associated faces enhance the influence of visual information on audiovisual speech perception and its eye movement pattern.
    Luo X; Kang G; Guo Y; Yu X; Zhou X
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1928-1941. PubMed ID: 31898072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neural correlates of interindividual differences in children's audiovisual speech perception.
    Nath AR; Fava EE; Beauchamp MS
    J Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 31(39):13963-71. PubMed ID: 21957257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Semantic priming from McGurk words: Priming depends on perception.
    Dorsi J; Ostrand R; Rosenblum LD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 May; 85(4):1219-1237. PubMed ID: 37155085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Processing of changes in visual speech in the human auditory cortex.
    Möttönen R; Krause CM; Tiippana K; Sams M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 May; 13(3):417-25. PubMed ID: 11919005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How prior expectations shape multisensory perception.
    Gau R; Noppeney U
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):876-886. PubMed ID: 26419391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Electrophysiological indicators of phonetic and non-phonetic multisensory interactions during audiovisual speech perception.
    Klucharev V; Möttönen R; Sams M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Dec; 18(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 14659498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Congruent audiovisual speech enhances auditory attention decoding with EEG.
    Fu Z; Wu X; Chen J
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Nov; 16(6):066033. PubMed ID: 31505476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hearing faces: how the infant brain matches the face it sees with the speech it hears.
    Bristow D; Dehaene-Lambertz G; Mattout J; Soares C; Gliga T; Baillet S; Mangin JF
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 May; 21(5):905-21. PubMed ID: 18702595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prediction across sensory modalities: A neurocomputational model of the McGurk effect.
    Olasagasti I; Bouton S; Giraud AL
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():61-75. PubMed ID: 26009260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Skilled musicians are not subject to the McGurk effect.
    Proverbio AM; Massetti G; Rizzi E; Zani A
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jul; 6():30423. PubMed ID: 27453363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Binding and unbinding the auditory and visual streams in the McGurk effect.
    Nahorna O; Berthommier F; Schwartz JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1061-77. PubMed ID: 22894226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. McGurk effect in non-English listeners: few visual effects for Japanese subjects hearing Japanese syllables of high auditory intelligibility.
    Sekiyama K; Tohkura Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1797-805. PubMed ID: 1960275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The McGurk effect: An investigation of attentional capacity employing response times.
    Altieri N; Lentz JJ; Townsend JT; Wenger MJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1712-27. PubMed ID: 27188651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.