These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37083809)

  • 1. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
    Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How readable and quality are online patient education materials about Helicobacter pylori?: Assessment of the readability, quality and reliability.
    Yilmaz Hanci S
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Oct; 102(43):e35543. PubMed ID: 37904459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the Readability, Quality, and Reliability of Online Patient Education Materials on Spinal Cord Stimulation.
    Gunduz ME; Matis GK; Ozduran E; Hanci V
    Turk Neurosurg; 2024; 34(4):588-599. PubMed ID: 38874237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online information on Behçet's disease.
    Özduran E; Hanci V
    Reumatismo; 2022 Sep; 74(2):. PubMed ID: 36101989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on post-covid pain.
    Ozduran E; Büyükçoban S
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13686. PubMed ID: 35880220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
    Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
    Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing parental comprehension of online resources on childhood pain.
    Ocmen E; Erdemir I; Aksu Erdost H; Hanci V
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Jun; 103(25):e38569. PubMed ID: 38905405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How understandable are the patient education materials about flat foot on the Internet for parents?
    Çiftci S; Şahin E; Aktaş SA; Safali S; Durgut F; Aydin BK
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Feb; 102(6):e32791. PubMed ID: 36820566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on chronic low back pain.
    Ozduran E; Hanci V; Erkin Y
    Natl Med J India; 2024; 37(3):124-130. PubMed ID: 39399994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma.
    Elhusseiny AM; Hassan AK; Hassan MA; Eleiwa TK; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Chauhan MZ; Shaikh O; Khouri AS; Sallam AB
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024; 61(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 38112390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Information for Patients and Their Families Regarding Schizophrenia.
    Ekinci O; Koyuncu AN
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2024 May; 212(5):278-283. PubMed ID: 38416420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.
    Arslan D; Tutar MS; Kozanhan B
    Eur J Pediatr; 2020 Dec; 179(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 32894353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to mammography for breast cancer screening.
    AlKhalili R; Shukla PA; Patel RH; Sanghvi S; Hubbi B
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 25488695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material on Websites of Breast Imaging Centers.
    Choudhery S; Xi Y; Chen H; Aboul-Fettouh N; Goldenmerry Y; Ho C; Viroslav H; Zhang C; Goudreau S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Oct; 17(10):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 32428435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
    Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
    Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma.
    Shah R; Mahajan J; Oydanich M; Khouri AS
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 35940574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality and readability of online health information on menopausal hormone therapy in Canada: what are our patients reading?
    Murtaza F; Shirreff L; Huang LN; Jacobson M; Jarcevic R; Christakis MK
    Menopause; 2021 Dec; 29(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 34905747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Readability of Online Information Regarding Hip Osteoarthritis.
    Lim B; Chai A; Shaalan M
    Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e60536. PubMed ID: 38887325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Glioblastoma: assessment of the readability and reliability of online information.
    Ahmadi O; Louw J; Leinonen H; Gan PYC
    Br J Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 35(5):551-554. PubMed ID: 33769170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.