330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37083809)
1. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How readable and quality are online patient education materials about Helicobacter pylori?: Assessment of the readability, quality and reliability.
Yilmaz Hanci S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Oct; 102(43):e35543. PubMed ID: 37904459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online information on Behçet's disease.
Özduran E; Hanci V
Reumatismo; 2022 Sep; 74(2):. PubMed ID: 36101989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the Readability, Quality and Reliability of Online Patient Education Materials on Spinal Cord Stimulation.
Gunduz ME; Matis GK; Ozduran E; Hanci V
Turk Neurosurg; 2023 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38874237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on post-covid pain.
Ozduran E; Büyükçoban S
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13686. PubMed ID: 35880220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing parental comprehension of online resources on childhood pain.
Ocmen E; Erdemir I; Aksu Erdost H; Hanci V
Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Jun; 103(25):e38569. PubMed ID: 38905405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How understandable are the patient education materials about flat foot on the Internet for parents?
Çiftci S; Şahin E; Aktaş SA; Safali S; Durgut F; Aydin BK
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Feb; 102(6):e32791. PubMed ID: 36820566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma.
Elhusseiny AM; Hassan AK; Hassan MA; Eleiwa TK; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Chauhan MZ; Shaikh O; Khouri AS; Sallam AB
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024; 61(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 38112390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Information for Patients and Their Families Regarding Schizophrenia.
Ekinci O; Koyuncu AN
J Nerv Ment Dis; 2024 May; 212(5):278-283. PubMed ID: 38416420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.
Arslan D; Tutar MS; Kozanhan B
Eur J Pediatr; 2020 Dec; 179(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 32894353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to mammography for breast cancer screening.
AlKhalili R; Shukla PA; Patel RH; Sanghvi S; Hubbi B
Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 25488695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material on Websites of Breast Imaging Centers.
Choudhery S; Xi Y; Chen H; Aboul-Fettouh N; Goldenmerry Y; Ho C; Viroslav H; Zhang C; Goudreau S
J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Oct; 17(10):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 32428435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma.
Shah R; Mahajan J; Oydanich M; Khouri AS
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 35940574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality and readability of online health information on menopausal hormone therapy in Canada: what are our patients reading?
Murtaza F; Shirreff L; Huang LN; Jacobson M; Jarcevic R; Christakis MK
Menopause; 2021 Dec; 29(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 34905747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Readability of Online Information Regarding Hip Osteoarthritis.
Lim B; Chai A; Shaalan M
Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e60536. PubMed ID: 38887325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Glioblastoma: assessment of the readability and reliability of online information.
Ahmadi O; Louw J; Leinonen H; Gan PYC
Br J Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 35(5):551-554. PubMed ID: 33769170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
