196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37083908)
1. Minimally Invasive Navigation-Guided Quad Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Comparative In Vitro Study.
Fan S; Gielisch MW; Díaz L; Thiem DGE; Al-Nawas B; Kämmerer PW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):367-373. PubMed ID: 37083908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants.
González Rueda JR; Galparsoro Catalán A; de Paz Hermoso VM; Riad Deglow E; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Pato Mourelo J; Montero Martín J; Hernández Montero S
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):150. PubMed ID: 36918837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.
Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of a dynamic navigation device on the accuracy of implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible: An in vitro study.
Feng Y; Yao Y; Yang X
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 35000696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: A randomized clinical study comparing the flapless versus the conventional approach.
Bhalerao A; Marimuthu M; Wahab A; Ayoub A
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104436. PubMed ID: 36736529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of the configurations of fiducial markers on accuracy of surgical navigation in zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study.
Fan S; Hung K; Bornstein MM; Huang W; Wang F; Wu Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):85–90. PubMed ID: 30521651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A hybrid robotic system for zygomatic implant placement based on mixed reality navigation.
Fan X; Feng Y; Tao B; Shen Y; Wu Y; Chen X
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Jun; 249():108156. PubMed ID: 38555744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel extraoral registration method for a dynamic navigation system guiding zygomatic implant placement in patients with maxillectomy defects.
Zhou W; Fan S; Wang F; Huang W; Jamjoom FZ; Wu Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jan; 50(1):116-120. PubMed ID: 32499080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the accuracy of two different dynamic navigation system registration methods for dental implant placement: A retrospective study.
Ma F; Sun F; Wei T; Ma Y
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 24(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 35536921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The accuracy of dynamic computer assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous jaws: A retrospective case series.
Wang J; Ge Y; Mühlemann S; Pan S; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Nov; 34(11):1278-1288. PubMed ID: 37642206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of the number and distribution of fiducial markers on the accuracy of robot-guided implant surgery in edentulous mandibular arches: An in vitro study.
Zhao Y; Liao Y; Wu X; Zhang Y; Shi B; Yan Q
J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104529. PubMed ID: 37105431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic navigation for prosthetically driven zygomatic implant placement in extensive maxillary defects: Results of a prospective case series.
Wang F; Fan S; Huang W; Shen Y; Li C; Wu Y
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Aug; 24(4):435-443. PubMed ID: 35605154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-Dimensional Evaluation of the Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Through an In-House Fully Guided Approach.
Hernández-Alfaro F; Bertos-Quílez J; Valls-Ontañón A; Paternostro-Betancourt D; Pindaros-Georgios F; Ragucci GM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(4):747-756. PubMed ID: 37669516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of dynamic implant navigation surgery performed by a novice operator.
Marques-Guasch J; Rodriguez-Bauzá R; Satorres-Nieto M; Hom-Lay W; Hernández-Alfaro F; Gargallo-Albiol J
Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Nov; 25(4):377-385. PubMed ID: 35060374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of a Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation System in the Placement of Zygomatic Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study.
González Rueda JR; García Ávila I; de Paz Hermoso VM; Riad Deglow E; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Pato Mourelo J; Montero Martín J; Hernández Montero S
J Clin Med; 2022 Mar; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 35268527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement.
Wu Y; Tao B; Lan K; Shen Y; Huang W; Wang F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Apr; 33(4):362-376. PubMed ID: 35113463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of Real-Time Surgical Navigation for Zygomatic Implant Insertion in Patients With Severely Atrophic Maxilla.
Wang F; Bornstein MM; Hung K; Fan S; Chen X; Huang W; Wu Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 76(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 28911958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Accuracy and clinical outcome of a real-time surgical navigation system for the placement of quad zygomatic implants].
Tao BX; Wang F; Shen YH; Fan SQ; Huang W; Wang YP; Wu YQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):845-850. PubMed ID: 33171557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of a dynamic navigation system for dental implantation with two different workflows and intraoral markers compared to static-guided implant surgery: An in-vitro study.
Struwe M; Leontiev W; Connert T; Kühl S; Filippi A; Herber V; Dagassan-Berndt D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Mar; 34(3):196-208. PubMed ID: 36626272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
