These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37084175)

  • 1. Comparative assessment of facemask therapy with and without skeletal anchorage in growing Class III patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP): A single-center, prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Dutta S; Batra P; Raghavan S; Sharma K; Talwar A; Arora A; Srivastava A
    Spec Care Dentist; 2024; 44(2):491-501. PubMed ID: 37084175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maxillary Protraction Therapy in Class III Patients With and Without Cleft Lip and Palate: An Interim Report of a Prospective Comparative Study.
    Lin Y; Fu Z; Guo R; Ma L; Li W
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2021 Apr; 58(4):429-437. PubMed ID: 32985240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.
    Ahn HW; Kim KW; Yang IH; Choi JY; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):935-41. PubMed ID: 22380632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of facemask in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Palikaraki G; Makrygiannakis MA; Zafeiriadis AA; Benetou V; Sanoudos M; Bitsanis I; Tsolakis AI
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Jan; 43(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 32274494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes of mild skeletal Class III malocclusion between facemask and facemask in combination with a miniscrew for anchorage in growing patients:
    Seiryu M; Ida H; Mayama A; Sasaki S; Sasaki S; Deguchi T; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Jan; 90(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 31398066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate : Evaluation of soft and hard tissues using the Alt-RAMEC protocol.
    Dogan E; Seckin O
    J Orofac Orthop; 2020 May; 81(3):209-219. PubMed ID: 32342120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentoskeletal effects of facemask therapy in skeletal Class III cleft patients with or without bone graft.
    Zhang Y; Jia H; Fu Z; Huang Y; Wang Z; Guo R; Shen J; Li W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):542-549. PubMed ID: 29602346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Long-Term Use of Facemask With Miniplate on Maxillary Protraction in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
    On SW; Baek SH; Choi JY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 29(2):309-314. PubMed ID: 29135737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A retrospective comparison of two protocols for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion in prepubertal children: hybrid hyrax expander with mandibular miniplates and rapid maxillary expansion with face mask.
    Tarraf NE; Dalci O; Dalci K; Altug AT; Darendeliler MA
    Prog Orthod; 2023 Jan; 24(1):3. PubMed ID: 36683080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of Different Methods of Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction in Cleft Lip and Palate Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Jahanbin A; Shafaee H; Pahlavan H; Bardideh E; Entezari M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2023 May; 34(3):875-880. PubMed ID: 36044271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate in mixed dentition: cephalometric evaluation after completion of growth.
    Susami T; Okayasu M; Inokuchi T; Ohkubo K; Uchino N; Uwatoko K; Takahashi-Ichikawa N; Nagahama K; Takato T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2014 Sep; 51(5):514-24. PubMed ID: 24010865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Alt-RAMEC With Facemask in Patients With Unilateral Cleft lip and Palate (UCLP) Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Finite Element Modeling-A Clinical Prospective Study.
    Singh S; Batra P; Raghavan S; Sharma K; Srivastava A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2022 Feb; 59(2):166-176. PubMed ID: 33754882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Soft-tissue profile changes during widening and protraction of the maxilla in patients with cleft lip and palate compared with normal growth and development.
    Tindlund RS; Rygh P
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1993 Sep; 30(5):454-68. PubMed ID: 8218309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skeletal response to maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate before age 10 years.
    Tindlund RS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1994 Jul; 31(4):295-308. PubMed ID: 7918525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Late maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a retrospective study.
    Borzabadi-Farahani A; Lane CJ; Yen SL
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2014 Jan; 51(1):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 23237432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of facemask therapy effects using skeletal and tooth-borne anchorage.
    Lee HJ; Choi DS; Jang I; Cha BK
    Angle Orthod; 2022 May; 92(3):307-314. PubMed ID: 34964848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the skeletodental effects of miniscrew-anchored and tooth-anchored facemask treatment in growing patients with skeletal class III malocclusions.
    Choi YK; Park JJ; Jeon HH; Kim YI
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov; 26(4):695-703. PubMed ID: 37272219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The study of maxillary protraction face mask combined with orthodontics for complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients].
    Zhang H; Fang B; Zhu M
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Jun; 14(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 15995762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term stability of maxillary protraction therapy in Class III patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Zhang Y; Fu Z; Jia H; Huang Y; Li X; Liu H; Li W
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):214-220. PubMed ID: 30484325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The short-term treatment effects of face mask therapy in Class III patients based on the anchorage device: miniplates vs rapid maxillary expansion.
    Lee NK; Yang IH; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 22264134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.