These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37084700)

  • 1. The Credibility of Physician Rating Websites: A Systematic Literature Review.
    Guetz B; Bidmon S
    Health Policy; 2023 Jun; 132():104821. PubMed ID: 37084700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eight questions about physician-rating websites: a systematic review.
    Emmert M; Sander U; Pisch F
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Feb; 15(2):e24. PubMed ID: 23372115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developments in the Frequency of Ratings and Evaluation Tendencies: A Review of German Physician Rating Websites.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Reimann S
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e299. PubMed ID: 28842391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jul; 21(7):e13816. PubMed ID: 31350838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Meyer A; Kahrass H
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Nov; 19(11):e387. PubMed ID: 29122739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why are so few patients rating their physicians on German physician rating websites? A qualitative study.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Kahrass H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Aug; 18(1):670. PubMed ID: 30157842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Impact of Social Influence on the Intention to Use Physician Rating Websites: Moderated Mediation Analysis Using a Mixed Methods Approach.
    Guetz B; Bidmon S
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Nov; 24(11):e37505. PubMed ID: 36374547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examining Different Factors in Web-Based Patients' Decision-Making Process: Systematic Review on Digital Platforms for Clinical Decision Support System.
    Shah AM; Muhammad W; Lee K; Naqvi RA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(21):. PubMed ID: 34769745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Who uses physician-rating websites? Differences in sociodemographic variables, psychographic variables, and health status of users and nonusers of physician-rating websites.
    Terlutter R; Bidmon S; Röttl J
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Mar; 16(3):e97. PubMed ID: 24686918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Awareness of and interaction with physician rating websites: A cross-sectional study in Austria.
    Guetz B; Bidmon S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278510. PubMed ID: 36584030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Content and Nature of Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Analysis of 849 Comments.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Sep; 21(9):e14336. PubMed ID: 31573918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Internal Patient Satisfaction Scores at a Cancer Center With Star Ratings on Online Physician-Rating Websites.
    Kim C; Chisholm G; Bevolo A; Shelton B; Kian L; Lewis CM; Garcia EA; Weber RS; Frumovitz M
    JCO Oncol Pract; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1181-e1188. PubMed ID: 33760627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An analysis of online evaluations on a physician rating website: evidence from a German public reporting instrument.
    Emmert M; Meier F
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e157. PubMed ID: 23919987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What Patients Value in Physicians: Analyzing Drivers of Patient Satisfaction Using Physician-Rating Website Data.
    Bidmon S; Elshiewy O; Terlutter R; Boztug Y
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Feb; 22(2):e13830. PubMed ID: 32012063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physician Rating Websites: an Analysis of Physician Evaluation and Physician Perception.
    Syed UA; Acevedo D; Narzikul AC; Coomer W; Beredjiklian PK; Abboud JA
    Arch Bone Jt Surg; 2019 Mar; 7(2):136-142. PubMed ID: 31211191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites.
    Emmert M; Adelhardt T; Sander U; Wambach V; Lindenthal J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():414. PubMed ID: 26404452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do German public reporting websites provide information that office-based physicians consider before referring patients to hospital? A four-step analysis.
    Kolb B; Emmert M; Sander U; Patzelt C; Schöffski O
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Nov; 137-138():42-53. PubMed ID: 30190204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rejected Online Feedback From a Swiss Physician Rating Website Between 2008 and 2017: Analysis of 2352 Ratings.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Aug; 22(8):e18374. PubMed ID: 32687479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What explains usage of mobile physician-rating apps? Results from a web-based questionnaire.
    Bidmon S; Terlutter R; Röttl J
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Jun; 16(6):e148. PubMed ID: 24918859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.