156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37085325)
1. Overviews of systematic reviews in sports and exercise medicine: what are they and why are they important?
Martínez-Calderon J
Br J Sports Med; 2023 Aug; 57(16):1005-1006. PubMed ID: 37085325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance.
Ardern CL; Büttner F; Andrade R; Weir A; Ashe MC; Holden S; Impellizzeri FM; Delahunt E; Dijkstra HP; Mathieson S; Rathleff MS; Reurink G; Sherrington C; Stamatakis E; Vicenzino B; Whittaker JL; Wright AA; Clarke M; Moher D; Page MJ; Khan KM; Winters M
Br J Sports Med; 2022 Feb; 56(4):175-195. PubMed ID: 34625401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.
DiSilvestro KJ; Tjoumakaris FP; Maltenfort MG; Spindler KP; Freedman KB
Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25899433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strategies used to manage overlap of primary study data by exercise-related overviews: protocol for a systematic methodological review.
Gutierrez-Arias R; Pieper D; Lunny C; Torres-Castro R; Aguilera-Eguía R; Seron P
BMJ Open; 2023 Apr; 13(4):e069906. PubMed ID: 37080626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How to formulate appropriate review questions for systematic reviews in sports medicine and rehabilitation?
Pourahmadi M; Delavari S; Koes B; Keshtkar A; Nazemipour M; Mansournia MA
Br J Sports Med; 2021 Nov; 55(22):1246-1247. PubMed ID: 34230038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and application of an outcome-centric approach for conducting overviews of reviews.
Kho ME; Poitras VJ; Janssen I; Chaput JP; Saunders TJ; Giangregorio LM; Tomasone JR; Ross-White A; Ross R
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2020 Oct; 45(10 (Suppl. 2)):S151-S164. PubMed ID: 33054336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unravelling confusion in sports medicine and sports science practice: a systematic approach to using the best of research and practice-based evidence to make a quality decision.
Ardern CL; Dupont G; Impellizzeri FM; O'Driscoll G; Reurink G; Lewin C; McCall A
Br J Sports Med; 2019 Jan; 53(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 28818957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Trusting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: all that glitters is not gold!
Weir A; Rabia S; Ardern C
Br J Sports Med; 2016 Sep; 50(18):1100-1. PubMed ID: 26968215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Was it a good idea to combine the studies? Why clinicians should care about heterogeneity when making decisions based on systematic reviews.
Grindem H; Mansournia MA; Øiestad BE; Ardern CL
Br J Sports Med; 2019 Apr; 53(7):399-401. PubMed ID: 30045836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Overviews of Reviews: Concept and Development.
López-López JA; Rubio-Aparicio M; Sánchez-Meca J
Psicothema; 2022 May; 34(2):175-181. PubMed ID: 35485529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sport and exercise medicine: a hot topic thanks to the Olympics.
Nunan D
Br J Gen Pract; 2013 Feb; 63(607):96-7. PubMed ID: 23561680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Serving the clinician and the patient: three ways that quality clinical guidelines can build on expert consensus statements and systematic reviews.
Ardern CL
Br J Sports Med; 2017 Apr; 51(7):557-558. PubMed ID: 27566194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. How exercise medicine has evolved from sports medicine.
Orchard JW
Med J Aust; 2018 Apr; 208(6):244-245. PubMed ID: 29614932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic review hacks for the sports and exercise clinician: five essential methodological elements.
Ardern CL
Br J Sports Med; 2016 Apr; 50(8):447-9. PubMed ID: 26612842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.
Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Becker LA; Featherstone R; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):190. PubMed ID: 27842604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current status of evidence-based sports medicine.
Harris JD; Cvetanovich G; Erickson BJ; Abrams GD; Chahal J; Gupta AK; McCormick FM; Bach BR
Arthroscopy; 2014 Mar; 30(3):362-71. PubMed ID: 24581261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Approaching the body of evidence: Key concepts of Overviews.
Cruzat B; Reveco-Guzmán K; Encina-Meneses M; Ortiz-Muñoz L; Bracchiglione J
Medwave; 2023 Jun; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 37279463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. If exercise is medicine, why don't we know the dose? An overview of systematic reviews assessing reporting quality of exercise interventions in health and disease.
Hansford HJ; Wewege MA; Cashin AG; Hagstrom AD; Clifford BK; McAuley JH; Jones MD
Br J Sports Med; 2022 Jun; 56(12):692-700. PubMed ID: 35168956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. From Protocol to Definitive Study-The State of Randomized Controlled Trial Evidence in Sports Medicine Research: A Systematic Review and Survey Study.
Pellarin M; Youmbi CT; Lotchuang J; Tejpal T; Thangathurai G; Khan A; Cohen D; Simunovic N; Duong A; Ayeni OR
Clin J Sport Med; 2023 May; 33(3):e44-e70. PubMed ID: 36652662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of nonsurgical interventions for anterior knee pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Collins NJ; Bisset LM; Crossley KM; Vicenzino B
Sports Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):31-49. PubMed ID: 22149696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
