168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37085607)
1. Startle-triggered responses indicate reticulospinal drive is larger for voluntary shoulder versus finger movements.
Maslovat D; Santangelo CM; Carlsen AN
Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6532. PubMed ID: 37085607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bimanual but not unimanual finger movements are triggered by a startling acoustic stimulus: evidence for increased reticulospinal drive for bimanual responses.
Maslovat D; Teku F; Smith V; Drummond NM; Carlsen AN
J Neurophysiol; 2020 Dec; 124(6):1832-1838. PubMed ID: 33026906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. StartReact effects are dependent on engagement of startle reflex circuits: support for a subcortically mediated initiation pathway.
Smith V; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN
J Neurophysiol; 2019 Dec; 122(6):2541-2547. PubMed ID: 31642402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Foreknowledge of an impending startling stimulus does not affect the proportion of startle reflexes or latency of StartReact responses.
Drummond NM; Leguerrier A; Carlsen AN
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Feb; 235(2):379-388. PubMed ID: 27738717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Excitability of the pathways mediating the startle reaction before execution of a voluntary movement.
Kumru H; Valls-Solé J
Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 169(3):427-32. PubMed ID: 16273394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical perturbations can elicit triggered reactions in the absence of a startle response.
Forgaard CJ; Franks IM; Bennett K; Maslovat D; Chua R
Exp Brain Res; 2018 Feb; 236(2):365-379. PubMed ID: 29151141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals differential cortical contributions to prepared responses.
Smith V; Maslovat D; Drummond NM; Hajj J; Leguerrier A; Carlsen AN
J Neurophysiol; 2019 May; 121(5):1809-1821. PubMed ID: 30864866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A TMS-induced cortical silent period delays the contralateral limb for bimanual symmetrical movements and the reaction time delay is reduced on startle trials.
Teku F; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN
J Neurophysiol; 2022 May; 127(5):1298-1308. PubMed ID: 35417257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Existence of the StartReact Effect Implies Reticulospinal, Not Corticospinal, Inputs Dominate Drive to Motoneurons during Voluntary Movement.
Tapia JA; Tohyama T; Poll A; Baker SN
J Neurosci; 2022 Oct; 42(40):7634-7647. PubMed ID: 36658461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An examination of the startle response during upper limb stretch perturbations.
Forgaard CJ; Franks IM; Maslovat D; Gowan NJ; Kim JC; Chua R
Neuroscience; 2016 Nov; 337():163-176. PubMed ID: 27664458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fractionation of muscle activity in rapid responses to startling cues.
Dean LR; Baker SN
J Neurophysiol; 2017 Apr; 117(4):1713-1719. PubMed ID: 28003416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Startle response of human neck muscles sculpted by readiness to perform ballistic head movements.
Siegmund GP; Inglis JT; Sanderson DJ
J Physiol; 2001 Aug; 535(Pt 1):289-300. PubMed ID: 11507178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retrospective composite analysis of StartReact data indicates sex differences in simple reaction time are not attributable to response preparation.
Sadler CM; Peters KJ; Santangelo CM; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN
Behav Brain Res; 2022 May; 426():113839. PubMed ID: 35306096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. StartReact during gait initiation reveals differential control of muscle activation and inhibition in patients with corticospinal degeneration.
van Lith BJH; Coppens MJM; Nonnekes J; van de Warrenburg BPC; Geurts AC; Weerdesteyn V
J Neurol; 2018 Nov; 265(11):2531-2539. PubMed ID: 30155740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cumulative distribution functions: An alternative approach to examine the triggering of prepared motor actions in the StartReact effect.
McInnes AN; Castellote JM; Kofler M; Honeycutt CF; Lipp OV; Riek S; Tresilian JR; Marinovic W
Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 53(5):1545-1568. PubMed ID: 32935412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Startle evokes nearly identical movements in multi-jointed, two-dimensional reaching tasks.
Ossanna MR; Zong X; Ravichandran VJ; Honeycutt CF
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Jan; 237(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 30306245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cortical involvement in the StartReact effect.
Stevenson AJ; Chiu C; Maslovat D; Chua R; Gick B; Blouin JS; Franks IM
Neuroscience; 2014 Jun; 269():21-34. PubMed ID: 24680855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reticulospinal Contributions to Gross Hand Function after Human Spinal Cord Injury.
Baker SN; Perez MA
J Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 37(40):9778-9784. PubMed ID: 28871033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neural coordination of bilateral hand movements: evidence for an involvement of brainstem motor centres.
Dietz V; Holliger NS; Christen A; Geissmann M; Filli L
J Physiol; 2024 Jan; 602(2):397-412. PubMed ID: 38178603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. StartReact effects in first dorsal interosseous muscle are absent in a pinch task, but present when combined with elbow flexion.
Castellote JM; Kofler M
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0201301. PubMed ID: 30048503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
