These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37085829)

  • 1. Influence of implant diameter on implant survival rate and clinical outcomes in the posterior area: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Pesce P; Del Fabbro M; Modenese L; Sandron S; Francetti L; Isola G; Canullo L; Menini M
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr; 23(1):235. PubMed ID: 37085829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of survival rate and crestal bone loss of narrow diameter dental implants versus regular dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Alrabiah M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2019 Feb; 10(1):e12367. PubMed ID: 30414262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Narrow-diameter implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schiegnitz E; Al-Nawas B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():21-40. PubMed ID: 30328192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Narrow-diameter implants versus regular-diameter implants for rehabilitation of the anterior region: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cruz RS; Lemos CAA; de Batista VES; Yogui FC; Oliveira HFF; Verri FR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 May; 50(5):674-682. PubMed ID: 33158693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Narrow- and regular-diameter implants in the posterior region of the jaws to support single crowns: A 3-year split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    de Souza AB; Sukekava F; Tolentino L; César-Neto JB; Garcez-Filho J; Araújo MG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):100-107. PubMed ID: 28994192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survival rate and clinico-radiographic parameters around narrow-diameter dental implants for fixed dental prostheses in the posterior regions: A systematic review.
    Alshiddi IF
    Dent Med Probl; 2023; 60(2):345-353. PubMed ID: 37669472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of external and internal implant-abutment connections for implant supported prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Bonfante EA; Santiago Júnior JF; Pellizzer EP
    J Dent; 2018 Mar; 70():14-22. PubMed ID: 29221955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Should the restoration of adjacent implants be splinted or nonsplinted? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Lemos CAA; Cruz RS; Oliveira HFF; Gomes JML; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 29961632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of Laser-Microtextured Surface Collar on Marginal Bone Loss and Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Chen Z; Zhang Y; Li J; Wang HL; Yu H
    J Periodontol; 2017 Jul; 88(7):651-662. PubMed ID: 28304212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Narrow-diameter versus regular-diameter dental implants for mandibular overdentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Park JH; Shin SW; Lee JY
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):669-678. PubMed ID: 37365991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Platform switching versus regular platform single implants: 5-year post-loading results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Meloni SM; Lumbau A; Baldoni E; Pisano M; Spano G; Massarelli O; Tallarico M
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2020; 13(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 32186286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical efficacy of anodized dental implants for implant-supported prostheses after different loading protocols: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Nagay BE; Dini C; Borges GA; Mesquita MF; Cavalcanti YW; Magno MB; Maia LC; Barão VAR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Sep; 32(9):1021-1040. PubMed ID: 34352130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Group 1 ITI Consensus Report: The influence of implant length and design and medications on clinical and patient-reported outcomes.
    Jung RE; Al-Nawas B; Araujo M; Avila-Ortiz G; Barter S; Brodala N; Chappuis V; Chen B; De Souza A; Almeida RF; Fickl S; Finelle G; Ganeles J; Gholami H; Hammerle C; Jensen S; Jokstad A; Katsuyama H; Kleinheinz J; Kunavisarut C; Mardas N; Monje A; Papaspyridakos P; Payer M; Schiegnitz E; Smeets R; Stefanini M; Ten Bruggenkate C; Vazouras K; Weber HP; Weingart D; Windisch P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():69-77. PubMed ID: 30328189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of narrow- vs. regular-diameter dental implants: a 3-year follow-up. A retrospective study.
    Zweers J; van Doornik A; Hogendorf EA; Quirynen M; Van der Weijden GA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 24372952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival rate of titanium-zirconium narrow diameter dental implants versus commercially pure titanium narrow diameter dental implants: A systematic review.
    Iegami CM; Uehara PN; Sesma N; Pannuti CM; Tortamano Neto P; Mukai MK
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 19(6):1015-1022. PubMed ID: 28853215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review.
    Esposito M; Grusovin MG; Rees J; Karasoulos D; Felice P; Alissa R; Worthington H; Coulthard P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2010; 3(1):7-26. PubMed ID: 20467595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Platform switching versus regular platform implants: 3-year post-loading results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Meloni SM; Jovanovic SA; Pisano M; Tallarico M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):381-390. PubMed ID: 27990506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peri-implant marginal bone level: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing platform switching versus conventionally restored implants.
    Annibali S; Bignozzi I; Cristalli MP; Graziani F; La Monaca G; Polimeni A
    J Clin Periodontol; 2012 Nov; 39(11):1097-113. PubMed ID: 22931292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical, radiographic and economic evaluation of short-6-mm implants and longer implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation in moderately atrophic maxillae: A 3-year randomized clinical trial.
    Shi JY; Lai YR; Qian SJ; Qiao SC; Tonetti MS; Lai HC
    J Clin Periodontol; 2021 May; 48(5):695-704. PubMed ID: 33570787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One-year clinical outcomes of locking taper Equator attachments retaining mandibular overdentures to narrow diameter implants.
    Marcello-Machado RM; Faot F; Schuster AJ; Bielemann AM; Chagas Júnior OL; Del Bel Cury AA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):483-492. PubMed ID: 29577575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.