These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37086284)

  • 1. Impact of material combinations and removal and insertion cycles on the retention force of telescopic systems.
    Micovic Soldatovic D; Bitter M; Meinen J; Huth KC; Liebermann A; Stawarczyk B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):4007-4016. PubMed ID: 37086284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of PEEK based telescopic crowns, a comparative study.
    Priester M; Müller WD; Beuer F; Schmidt F; Schwitalla AD
    Dent Mater; 2021 Nov; 37(11):1667-1675. PubMed ID: 34479724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double-Crown Prosthesis Retention Using Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK): An In Vitro Study.
    Igarashi K; Katagiri H; Abou-Ayash S; Schimmel M; Afrashtehfar KI
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Feb; 32(2):154-161. PubMed ID: 35343624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of Retention of CAD-CAM Milled PEKK vs PEEK Double Crown-retained Removable Partial Dentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Refai OM; Nawar NH; Lebshtien IT
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Nov; 22(11):1250-1256. PubMed ID: 35343449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retentive force of PEEK secondary crowns on zirconia primary crowns over time.
    Schubert O; Reitmaier J; Schweiger J; Erdelt K; Güth JF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2331-2338. PubMed ID: 30293185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention Load of Telescopic Crowns with Different Taper Angles between Cobalt-Chromium and Polyetheretherketone Made with Three Different Manufacturing Processes Examined by Pull-Off Test.
    Wagner C; Stock V; Merk S; Schmidlin PR; Roos M; Eichberger M; Stawarczyk B
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 27037795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention forces between primary and secondary CAD/CAM manufactured telescopic crowns: an in vitro comparison of common material combinations.
    Schimmel M; Walther M; Al-Haj Husain N; Igarashi K; Wittneben J; Abou-Ayash S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Nov; 25(11):6297-6307. PubMed ID: 33834311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture Resistance of Zirconia, Polyetheretherketone, and Polyetherketoneketone Implant Abutments After Aging.
    Türksayar AAD; Atsü SS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(2):332-340. PubMed ID: 33909724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retention and fatigue performance of modified polyetheretherketone clasps for removable prosthesis.
    Luo Y; Qiu L; Geng M; Zhang W
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Jun; 154():106539. PubMed ID: 38598917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retentive force of a conical crown with CAD/CAM-fabricated PEEK and zirconia secondary crowns on titanium implant abutments.
    Kamel A; Yamazaki T; Murakami N; Lyu H; Komine K; Badr A; Fekry G; Takahashi H; Wakabayashi N
    Dent Mater J; 2023 May; 42(3):336-342. PubMed ID: 36709987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps.
    Tannous F; Steiner M; Shahin R; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2012 Mar; 28(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22130464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methodology investigation: Impact of crown geometry, crown, abutment and antagonist material and thermal loading on the two-body wear of dental materials.
    Schmeiser F; Arbogast F; Ruppel H; Mayinger F; Reymus M; Stawarczyk B
    Dent Mater; 2022 Feb; 38(2):266-280. PubMed ID: 34953628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aging and Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Molar Crowns with a CAD/CAM Resin Composite Veneer Structure.
    Rauch A; Heinzmann W; Rosentritt M; Hahnel S; Schmidt MB; Fuchs F; Koenig A
    J Clin Med; 2023 Sep; 12(18):. PubMed ID: 37762937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retentive Forces of Removable Partial Denture Clasp Assemblies Made from Polyaryletherketone and Cobalt-Chromium: A Comparative Study.
    Gentz FI; Brooks DI; Liacouras PC; Petrich A; Hamlin CM; Ellert DO; Ye L
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 34081360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fatigue behaviour of dental crowns made from a novel high-performance polymer PEKK.
    Katzenbach A; Dörsam I; Stark H; Bourauel C; Keilig L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Aug; 25(8):4895-4905. PubMed ID: 33506428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PEEK Primary Crowns with Cobalt-Chromium, Zirconia and Galvanic Secondary Crowns with Different Tapers-A Comparison of Retention Forces.
    Stock V; Schmidlin PR; Merk S; Wagner C; Roos M; Eichberger M; Stawarczyk B
    Materials (Basel); 2016 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 28773311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of the retention forces of secondary telescopic crowns made from Pekkton® ivory in combination with primary crowns made from four different dental alloys: an in vitro study.
    Kotthaus M; Hasan I; Keilig L; Grüner M; Bourauel C; Stark H
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2019 Sep; 64(5):555-562. PubMed ID: 30875315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative analysis of the retention force and deformation of PEEK and PEKK removable partial denture clasps with different thicknesses and undercut depths.
    Lee WF; Chen MS; Peng TY; Huang PC; Nikawa H; Peng PW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):291.e1-291.e9. PubMed ID: 38057199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surface Wear and Retention Force of Zirconia and PEKK Implant-retained Crowns.
    Emera RMK; Askar O
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2024 Feb; 32(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 37549130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro investigations on retention force behavior of conventional and modern double crown systems.
    Luft V; Pospiech P; Schurig A; Schmitter M
    Dent Mater; 2021 Jan; 37(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 33276956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.