These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37086438)

  • 1. Pocket to concavity: a tool for the refinement of protein-ligand binding site shape from alpha spheres.
    Kudo G; Hirao T; Yoshino R; Shigeta Y; Hirokawa T
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Apr; 39(4):. PubMed ID: 37086438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Development and validation of programs for ligand-binding-pocket search].
    Oda A
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2011; 131(10):1429-35. PubMed ID: 21963969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protein pocket detection via convex hull surface evolution and associated Reeb graph.
    Zhao R; Cang Z; Tong Y; Wei GW
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Sep; 34(17):i830-i837. PubMed ID: 30423105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting allosteric pockets in protein biological assemblages.
    Kumar A; Kaynak BT; Dorman KS; Doruker P; Jernigan RL
    Bioinformatics; 2023 May; 39(5):. PubMed ID: 37115636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LigVoxel: inpainting binding pockets using 3D-convolutional neural networks.
    Skalic M; Varela-Rial A; Jiménez J; Martínez-Rosell G; De Fabritiis G
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 35(2):243-250. PubMed ID: 29982392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design.
    Liang J; Edelsbrunner H; Woodward C
    Protein Sci; 1998 Sep; 7(9):1884-97. PubMed ID: 9761470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visualisation of variable binding pockets on protein surfaces by probabilistic analysis of related structure sets.
    Ashford P; Moss DS; Alex A; Yeap SK; Povia A; Nobeli I; Williams MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13():39. PubMed ID: 22417279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fpocket: an open source platform for ligand pocket detection.
    Le Guilloux V; Schmidtke P; Tuffery P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jun; 10():168. PubMed ID: 19486540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction.
    Hoffmann B; Zaslavskiy M; Vert JP; Stoven V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():99. PubMed ID: 20175916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subpocket-Based Analysis Approach for the Protein Pocket Dynamics.
    Lv N; Cao Z
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Jun; 20(11):4909-4920. PubMed ID: 38772734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving protein-ligand binding site prediction accuracy by classification of inner pocket points using local features.
    Krivák R; Hoksza D
    J Cheminform; 2015; 7():12. PubMed ID: 25932051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of the druggable concavity in homology models using the PLB index.
    Soga S; Shirai H; Kobori M; Hirayama N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2287-92. PubMed ID: 17935312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures.
    Glaser F; Morris RJ; Najmanovich RJ; Laskowski RA; Thornton JM
    Proteins; 2006 Feb; 62(2):479-88. PubMed ID: 16304646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Form follows function: shape analysis of protein cavities for receptor-based drug design.
    Weisel M; Proschak E; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    Proteomics; 2009 Jan; 9(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 19142949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhibition of protein interactions: co-crystalized protein-protein interfaces are nearly as good as holo proteins in rigid-body ligand docking.
    Belkin S; Kundrotas PJ; Vakser IA
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jul; 32(7):769-779. PubMed ID: 30003468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. webPDBinder: a server for the identification of ligand binding sites on protein structures.
    Bianchi V; Mangone I; Ferrè F; Helmer-Citterich M; Ausiello G
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Jul; 41(Web Server issue):W308-13. PubMed ID: 23737450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognizing protein-ligand binding sites by global structural alignment and local geometry refinement.
    Roy A; Zhang Y
    Structure; 2012 Jun; 20(6):987-97. PubMed ID: 22560732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of pockets on protein surfaces using small and large probe spheres to find putative ligand binding sites.
    Kawabata T; Go N
    Proteins; 2007 Aug; 68(2):516-29. PubMed ID: 17444522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cavity Versus Ligand Shape Descriptors: Application to Urokinase Binding Pockets.
    Cerisier N; Regad L; Triki D; Camproux AC; Petitjean M
    J Comput Biol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1134-1137. PubMed ID: 28570103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ASEDock-docking based on alpha spheres and excluded volumes.
    Goto J; Kataoka R; Muta H; Hirayama N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):583-90. PubMed ID: 18278891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.