These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. [Individual tray composed of two parts for functional impressions in case of pterygoid defects]. Orlicki R; Jaworska M; Kasperski J Protet Stomatol; 1989; 39(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 2701123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of different adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane bond strength to two tray materials. Peregrina A; Land MF; Wandling C; Johnston WM J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16126072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays. Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effect of custom tray material type and surface treatment on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system. Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Bosser MJ; Nafso AJ Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 8397701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts. Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays. Ishida K Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Clinical study on impression for denture basal surface (1st report). Largeness of escape hole in individual tray (author's transl)]. Mizokami T; Kodaira T; Nanami T; Hayashi H; Nishi K; Tsugayasu H; Tanaka A; Takeuchi R Shikwa Gakuho; 1978 Apr; 78(4):667-74. PubMed ID: 398591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [The role of the handle of the individual tray in the preparation and control of a functional impression of the mandible]. Kaán M Fogorv Sz; 1972 Mar; 65(3):68-73. PubMed ID: 4557678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [The dimensional stability of alginate impression materials. Effects of impression thickness, impression diameter and retentive condition with a tray]. Sekiguchi E Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1988 Nov; 7(6):861-74. PubMed ID: 3078378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A controllable impression tray for making complete denture impressions. Abadi BJ; Arementrout TM; Gattozzi JG Quintessence Dent Technol; 1986; 10(10):649-53. PubMed ID: 3538217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of impression tray techniques in microstomic patients. Hasanreisoglu U; Uçtasli S; Gurbuz A Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Sep; 1(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 1291022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fabrication of a custom-made impression tray for making preliminary impressions of edentulous mandibles. Sofou AM; Diakoyianni-Mordohai I; Pissiotis AL; Emmanuel I Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):513-6. PubMed ID: 9807132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Simplified technique for custom tray fabrication. Mirbod SM J Can Dent Assoc; 1997 May; 63(5):402. PubMed ID: 9170754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Temporization utilizing the double bite impression tray, Part 1. Kwok LA Dent Assist; 1993; 62(2):50-1. PubMed ID: 9790027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]