164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37087525)
1. Comparison Between Simultaneous and Sequential Utilization of Safety and Efficacy for Optimal Dose Determination in Bayesian Model-Assisted Designs.
Li R; Takeda K; Rong A
Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2023 Jul; 57(4):728-736. PubMed ID: 37087525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. TITE-BOIN-ET: Time-to-event Bayesian optimal interval design to accelerate dose-finding based on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes.
Takeda K; Morita S; Taguri M
Pharm Stat; 2020 May; 19(3):335-349. PubMed ID: 31829517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. BOIN-ET: Bayesian optimal interval design for dose finding based on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes.
Takeda K; Taguri M; Morita S
Pharm Stat; 2018 Jul; 17(4):383-395. PubMed ID: 29700965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. TITE-gBOIN-ET: Time-to-event generalized Bayesian optimal interval design to accelerate dose-finding accounting for ordinal graded efficacy and toxicity outcomes.
Takeda K; Yamaguchi Y; Taguri M; Morita S
Biom J; 2023 Oct; 65(7):e2200265. PubMed ID: 37309248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. gBOIN-ET: The generalized Bayesian optimal interval design for optimal dose-finding accounting for ordinal graded efficacy and toxicity in early clinical trials.
Takeda K; Morita S; Taguri M
Biom J; 2022 Oct; 64(7):1178-1191. PubMed ID: 35561046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Introduction of Oncology Dose-Finding Trial Designs].
Takeda K
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2022 Apr; 49(4):365-370. PubMed ID: 35444116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Bayesian optimal interval design for dose optimization with a randomization scheme based on pharmacokinetics outcomes in oncology.
Takeda K; Zhu J; Li R; Yamaguchi Y
Pharm Stat; 2023; 22(6):1104-1115. PubMed ID: 37545018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adaptive design for identifying maximum tolerated dose early to accelerate dose-finding trial.
Kojima M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):97. PubMed ID: 35382745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian dose-finding phase I trial design incorporating pharmacokinetic assessment in the field of oncology.
Takeda K; Komatsu K; Morita S
Pharm Stat; 2018 Nov; 17(6):725-733. PubMed ID: 30066356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian optimization design for dose-finding based on toxicity and efficacy outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.
Takahashi A; Suzuki T
Pharm Stat; 2021 May; 20(3):422-439. PubMed ID: 33258282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Design considerations for phase I/II dose finding clinical trials in Immuno-oncology and cell therapy.
Liu R; Lin J; Li P
Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 Sep; 96():106083. PubMed ID: 32659438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. BOIN-ETC: A Bayesian optimal interval design considering efficacy and toxicity to identify the optimal dose combinations.
Kakizume T; Takeda K; Taguri M; Morita S
Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 Apr; 33(4):716-727. PubMed ID: 38444354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incorporating historical information to improve dose optimization design with toxicity and efficacy endpoints: iBOIN-ET.
Zhao Y; Liu R; Takeda K
Pharm Stat; 2023; 22(3):440-460. PubMed ID: 36514849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shotgun: A Bayesian seamless phase I-II design to accelerate the development of targeted therapies and immunotherapy.
Jiang L; Li R; Yan F; Yap TA; Yuan Y
Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 May; 104():106338. PubMed ID: 33711459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A phase I/II seamless dose escalation/expansion with adaptive randomization scheme (SEARS).
Pan H; Xie F; Liu P; Xia J; Ji Y
Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 24137041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.
Lin R; Yin G
Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4106-4120. PubMed ID: 28786138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sequential or combined designs for Phase I/II clinical trials? A simulation study.
Rossoni C; Bardet A; Geoerger B; Paoletti X
Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 16(6):635-644. PubMed ID: 31538815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Bayesian adaptive Phase I-II clinical trial for evaluating efficacy and toxicity with delayed outcomes.
Koopmeiners JS; Modiano J
Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 24082004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving early phase oncology clinical trial design: The case for finding the optimal biological dose.
Phillips A; Mondal S
Pharm Stat; 2023; 22(4):739-747. PubMed ID: 36669771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of Bayesian hierarchical models for phase I/II clinical trials in oncology.
Yada S; Hamada C
Pharm Stat; 2017 Mar; 16(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 27892650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
