129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37088572)
1. Plan quality score to evaluate the dwell time deviation restricted inverse planning by simulated annealing and graphically optimized treatment plans for template based interstitial brachytherapy.
Mondal K; Muskaan ; Mourya A; Choudhary S; Mandal A; Singh A; Aggarwal LM
Cancer Radiother; 2023 May; 27(3):196-205. PubMed ID: 37088572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric impact of dwell time deviation constraint on inverse brachytherapy treatment planning and comparison with conventional optimization method for interstitial brachytherapy implants.
Roy S; Subramani V; Singh K; Rathi AK
J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(2):463-470. PubMed ID: 34121693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Study of the effects of dwell time deviation constraints on inverse planning simulated annealing optimized plans of intracavitary brachytherapy of cancer cervix.
Roy S; Subramani V; Singh K; Rathi AK; Savita A; Aditi A
J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(6):1370-1376. PubMed ID: 31898675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of the dwell time deviation constraint (DTDC) parameter on dosimetry with IPSA optimisation for HDR prostate brachytherapy.
Smith RL; Panettieri V; Lancaster C; Mason N; Franich RD; Millar JL
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Mar; 38(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 25481387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two inverse planning algorithms for cervical cancer brachytherapy.
Fu Q; Xu Y; Zuo J; An J; Huang M; Yang X; Chen J; Yan H; Dai J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):157-165. PubMed ID: 33626225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric comparison of inverse optimisation methods versus forward optimisation in HDR brachytherapy of breast, cervical and prostate cancer.
Fröhlich G; Geszti G; Vízkeleti J; Ágoston P; Polgár C; Major T
Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Nov; 195(11):991-1000. PubMed ID: 31482321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric comparison of volume-based and inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations for high-dose rate brachytherapy.
Pelagade S; Maddirala HR; Misra R; Suryanarayan U; Neema JP
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 25795565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of the dwell time deviation constraint on brachytherapy treatment planning for cervical cancer.
Yan G; Kang S; Tang B; Li J; Wang P; Wang X; Lang J
J Int Med Res; 2021 Aug; 49(8):3000605211037477. PubMed ID: 34423665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A method for restricting intracatheter dwell time variance in high-dose-rate brachytherapy plan optimization.
Cunha A; Siauw T; Hsu IC; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 26727333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robustness of IPSA optimized high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans to catheter displacements.
Poder J; Whitaker M
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2016 Jun; 8(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 27504129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric Evaluation of Different Optimization Algorithms Used in Interstitial Brachytherapy of Cervical Carcinoma.
Srivastava S; Singh N; Kashyap VK
J Biomed Phys Eng; 2022 Aug; 12(4):339-348. PubMed ID: 36059288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric comparison of graphical optimization and inverse planning simulated annealing for brachytherapy of cervical cancer.
Tang B; Liu X; Wang X; Kang S; Wang P; Li J; Orlandini LC
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2019 Aug; 11(4):379-383. PubMed ID: 31523240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimization for high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer with adaptive simulated annealing and gradient descent.
Yao R; Templeton AK; Liao Y; Turian JV; Kiel KD; Chu JC
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 24359671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of inverse planning simulated annealing and geometrical optimization for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Hsu IC; Lessard E; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15533807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Morton GC; Sankreacha R; Halina P; Loblaw A
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 18037356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of graphical optimization or IPSA for improving brachytheraphy plans associated with inadequate target coverage for cervical cancer.
Liu Z; Liang H; Wang X; Yang H; Deng Y; Luo T; Yang C; Lu M; Fu Q; Zhu X
Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):16423. PubMed ID: 29180703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric comparison of optimization methods for multichannel intracavitary brachytherapy for superficial vaginal tumors.
Lapuz C; Dempsey C; Capp A; O'Brien PC
Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(6):637-44. PubMed ID: 23850274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Asymmetric dose-volume optimization with smoothness control for rotating-shield brachytherapy.
Liu Y; Flynn RT; Kim Y; Wu X
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111709. PubMed ID: 25370623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of IPSA with dose-point optimization and manual optimization for interstitial template brachytherapy for gynecologic cancers.
Jamema SV; Sharma S; Mahantshetty U; Engineer R; Shrivastava SK; Deshpande DD
Brachytherapy; 2011; 10(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 21030317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Dosimetric analysis of different optimization algorithms for three-dimensional brachytherapy for gynecologic tumors].
Ling B; Chen L; Zhang J; Cao X; Ye W; Ouyang Y; Chi F; Ding Z
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2024 Apr; 44(4):773-779. PubMed ID: 38708512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
