161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3709094)
1. Microtiter latex agglutination--quantitative and qualitative equivalent to hemagglutination inhibition for detection of rubella antibody.
Mayo DR; Sirpenski SP; Markowski M
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1986 May; 5(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 3709094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rubella antibodies detected by several commercial immunoassays in hemagglutination inhibition-negative sera.
Kleeman KT; Kiefer DJ; Halbert SP
J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Nov; 18(5):1131-7. PubMed ID: 6643666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, hemagglutination inhibition, and passive latex agglutination for determination of rubella immune status.
Steece RS; Talley MS; Skeels MR; Lanier GA
J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jan; 21(1):140-2. PubMed ID: 3968201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in antibody responses with rapid agglutination tests for the detection of rubella antibodies.
Chernesky MA; DeLong DJ; Mahony JB; Castriciano S
J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Apr; 23(4):772-6. PubMed ID: 3517065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the latex agglutination test with the hemagglutination inhibition test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and neutralization test for detection of antibodies to rubella virus.
Meegan JM; Evans BK; Horstmann DM
J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Oct; 16(4):644-9. PubMed ID: 7153314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid latex agglutination test for rubella antibody.
Sever JL; Tzan NR; Shekarchi IC; Madden DL
J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Jan; 17(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 6826709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Latex-agglutination test for rubella antibody: validity of positive results assessed by response to immunization and comparison with other tests.
Storch GA; Myers N
J Infect Dis; 1984 Mar; 149(3):459-64. PubMed ID: 6371155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of immune status in patients with low antibody titers for rubella virus.
Fayram SL; Akin S; Aarnaes SL; Peterson EM; de la Maza LM
J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Jan; 25(1):178-80. PubMed ID: 3539991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of the latex agglutination method with the hemagglutination inhibition test in the detection of antibodies against rubella virus].
Cello J; Castaño G; Freire MC; Novillo AA
Rev Argent Microbiol; 1987; 19(4):173-5. PubMed ID: 3503313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a passive hemagglutination test kit for the detection of rubella antibodies.
West DJ; Manty AM; Siem RA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Apr; 77(4):462-4. PubMed ID: 7072654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a latex agglutination test for detection of antibodies to rubella virus in selected sera.
Freeman S; Clark L; Dumas N
J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Jul; 18(1):197-8. PubMed ID: 6885988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New latex agglutination test for rapid determination of rubella immune status.
Weissfeld AS; Sonnenwirth AC
J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Nov; 16(5):971-2. PubMed ID: 7153349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of a new, rapid enzyme immunoassay with a latex agglutination test for qualitative detection of rubella antibodies.
Ferraro MJ; Kallas WM; Welch KP; Lau AY
J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Sep; 25(9):1722-4. PubMed ID: 3308952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of a simple latex agglutination test with hemolysis-in-gel, hemagglutination inhibition, and radioimmunoassay for detection of rubella virus antibodies.
Väänänen P; Häivä VM; Koskela P; Meurman O
J Clin Microbiol; 1985 May; 21(5):793-5. PubMed ID: 3998112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of two passive agglutination procedures with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for rubella antibody status.
Pruneda RC; Dover JC
Am J Clin Pathol; 1986 Dec; 86(6):768-70. PubMed ID: 3788864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative study of 2 latex tests (rubalex and rubascan) with an immunoenzyme test (enzygnost-rubella) and a hemagglutination inhibition test for the study of anti-rubella antibodies].
Rescaldani R; Vigorè L; Viganò EF; Giltri G; Andreani G
Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1986 Jun; 22(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 3823362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a new latex test and a new enzyme immunoassay for determination of rubella immunity.
Simor AE; Chua R; Low DE
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Aug; 26(8):1582-3. PubMed ID: 3049661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of in vivo challenge to assess rubella immunity determined by haemagglutination inhibition and latex agglutination.
Grangeot-Keros L; Badur S; Pons JC; Duthu S; Pillot J
Res Virol; 1989; 140(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 2587849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of rubella immunity by latex agglutination: its place in clinical routines.
Blomberg J; Hedlund T
Scand J Infect Dis; 1984; 16(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 6396832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fluorescence immunoassay and passive latex agglutination as alternatives to hemagglutination inhibition for determining rubella immune status.
Fayram SL; Nakasone A; Aarnaes S; Zartarian M; Peterson EM; de la Maza LM
J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Apr; 17(4):685-8. PubMed ID: 6343424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
