These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37091441)

  • 1. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of LMA Protector and LMA-ProSeal in different head and neck positions in anaesthetized and paralyzed patients; A prospective randomized study.
    Kerai S; Bhatt G; Saxena KN; Gaba P; Wadhwa B
    Indian J Anaesth; 2023 Feb; 67(2):201-206. PubMed ID: 37091441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the reinforced and standard laryngeal mask airway: ease of insertion and the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure.
    Buckham M; Brooker M; Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 1999 Dec; 27(6):628-31. PubMed ID: 10631418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2003 Jan; 20(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12553391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of LMA Protector and LMA ProSeal in anaesthetised paralysed patients - A randomised controlled trial.
    Bhardwaj M; Dhania S; Kaur K; Lal J; Priya ; Singhal SK
    Indian J Anaesth; 2023 Nov; 67(Suppl 4):S245-S250. PubMed ID: 38187973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Head and Neck Position on Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Cuff Position with the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway and the I-Gel: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Mishra SK; Nawaz M; Satyapraksh MV; Parida S; Bidkar PU; Hemavathy B; Kundra P
    Anesthesiol Res Pract; 2015; 2015():705869. PubMed ID: 25648620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized comparison of the Baska FESS mask and the LMA Supreme in different head and neck positions.
    Foo LL; Shariffuddin II; Chaw SH; Lee PK; Lee CE; Chen YS; Chan L
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2018 Aug; 15(8):597-603. PubMed ID: 30095289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J
    Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):913-6. PubMed ID: 10195547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison and evaluation of single-use LMA supreme versus the reusable proseal LMA in paralyzed patients undergoing surgery with controlled ventilation.
    Sood S; Chahar S; Thakur A; Gupta M; Saxena A; Subramanian S
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2020; 36(4):494-499. PubMed ID: 33840930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Study of Two Laryngeal Mask Airways: Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway in Anesthetized Paralyzed Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery.
    Gill RK; Tarat A; Pathak D; Dutta S
    Anesth Essays Res; 2017; 11(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 28298751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of head and neck position on the oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position of three supraglottic airway devices.
    Park SH; Han SH; Do SH; Kim JW; Kim JH
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan; 108(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 19095838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Device stability and quality of ventilation of classic laryngeal mask airway versus AIR-Q and I-gel at different head and neck positions in anesthetized spontaneously breathing children.
    Abdel-Ghaffar HS; Abdelal FA; Osman MA; Soliman OM
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2020 Mar; 86(3):286-294. PubMed ID: 31922375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of self-pressurized Air-Q
    Rana S; Anand LK; Singh M; Kapoor D; Gupta D; Kaur H
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2024; 40(2):336-343. PubMed ID: 38919429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective randomized comparison of airway seal using the novel vision-guided insertion of LMA-Supreme® and LMA-Protector®.
    van Zundert AAJ; Wyssusek KH; Pelecanos A; Roets M; Kumar CM
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Apr; 34(2):285-294. PubMed ID: 30953222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit.
    Acx E; Van Caelenberg E; De Baerdemaeker L; Coppens M
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2021; 37(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 34349370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J
    Br J Anaesth; 2000 Aug; 85(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 10992836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of lateral position and pneumoperitoneum on oropharyngeal leak pressure with two types of laryngeal mask airways.
    Lan S; Zhou Y; Li JT; Zhao ZZ; Liu Y
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2017 Oct; 61(9):1114-1121. PubMed ID: 28741716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Pneumoperitoneum and Lateral Position on Oropharyngeal Seal Pressures of Proseal LMA in Laparoscopic Urological Procedures.
    Rustagi P; Patkar GA; Ourasang AK; Tendolkar BA
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Feb; 11(2):UC05-UC09. PubMed ID: 28384963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between three second generation supraglottic airway devices during laparoscopic surgery in pediatric patients.
    Kumar A; Sinha C; Kumar N; Kumar A; Kumar B; Kumar A; Kumar R
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2022 Jul; 32(7):843-850. PubMed ID: 35338764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Four Different Supraglottic Airway Devices in Terms of Efficacy, Intra-ocular Pressure and Haemodynamic Parameters in Children Undergoing Ophthalmic Surgery.
    Peker G; Takmaz SA; Baltacı B; Başar H; Kotanoğlu M
    Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2015 Oct; 43(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 27366519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.
    Anand LK; Goel N; Singh M; Kapoor D
    Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2016 Jun; 54(2):44-50. PubMed ID: 27106162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.